HUD awards $2.7M contract for Technical Evaluation Panel Chair Services to Dynamic-Pro Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $270,000 ($270.0K)

Contractor: Dynamic-Pro Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development

Start Date: 2026-04-10

End Date: 2027-04-09

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $742/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: TECHNICAL EVALUATION PANEL (TEP) CHAIR SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: SPOTSYLVANIA, SPOTSYLVANIA County, VIRGINIA, 22551

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated $270,000 to DYNAMIC-PRO INC. for work described as: TECHNICAL EVALUATION PANEL (TEP) CHAIR SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract focuses on administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. Awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Duration of one year with potential for renewal indicates ongoing need. 4. Delivery order under an existing contract structure. 5. Service type is labor hours, common for consulting engagements. 6. Contractor is Dynamic-Pro Inc., with services to be performed in Virginia.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $2.7 million for a one-year Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) Chair Services contract appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized consulting. Benchmarking against similar TEP chair services is difficult without more specific details on the scope and complexity of the technical evaluations. However, the labor hours pricing model allows for flexibility, but requires careful monitoring to ensure efficiency and prevent cost overruns. The absence of a specific price per labor hour makes direct comparison challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. This approach generally fosters price discovery and encourages competitive pricing. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific requirement. The agency's choice of full and open competition is a positive sign for achieving value for taxpayer money.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is the most advantageous for taxpayers as it maximizes the pool of potential offerors, driving down prices through robust bidding and increasing the likelihood of selecting the best value solution.

Public Impact

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) benefits from expert technical evaluation support. Services will ensure the quality and integrity of technical evaluations for HUD programs. The contract supports administrative management and general management consulting expertise. Work will be performed in Virginia, potentially supporting local employment in the consulting sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep in labor hours contracts if not managed tightly.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical evaluation services could pose a risk if performance falters.
The specific technical expertise required for TEP chair services may be niche, limiting future competition if not properly documented.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
The contractor, Dynamic-Pro Inc., has secured this award, suggesting they meet the required qualifications.
The contract duration of one year provides a defined period for service delivery and performance assessment.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically administrative and management consulting. The market for such services is broad, with numerous firms capable of providing TEP chair support. HUD's spending on consulting services like these is typical for agencies requiring specialized expertise to support program management and technical reviews. Benchmarking against similar contracts would require detailed analysis of the specific technical domains being evaluated.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless Dynamic-Pro Inc. voluntarily engages small business subcontractors. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be needed to assess the full impact.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and program officials within the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Performance will be monitored against the terms of the delivery order and the underlying contract. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases, though specific performance metrics and evaluation reports may not be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Technical Evaluation Services
Management and Consulting Services
Federal Procurement Support
Program Management Support

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns in labor-hour contracts if not closely monitored.
Dependence on contractor expertise requires diligent performance management.
Scope definition clarity is crucial for effective TEP chair services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded $270,000 to DYNAMIC-PRO INC.. TECHNICAL EVALUATION PANEL (TEP) CHAIR SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DYNAMIC-PRO INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development (Department of Housing and Urban Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $270,000.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-10. End: 2027-04-09.

What is the specific technical domain or program for which these Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) Chair services are being provided?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'TECHNICAL EVALUATION PANEL (TEP) CHAIR SERVICES' and falls under NAICS code 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services). However, it does not specify the particular technical domain or program within the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that these services support. TEP chairs are typically responsible for overseeing the technical review of proposals submitted in response to solicitations, ensuring fairness, consistency, and adherence to evaluation criteria. Without knowing the specific program (e.g., IT system procurement, construction project oversight, grant program evaluation), it is difficult to assess the criticality or complexity of the TEP chair's role and the associated value of the services.

How does the $2.7 million contract value compare to typical spending for TEP Chair services at HUD or similar agencies?

Directly comparing the $2.7 million contract value for TEP Chair services is challenging without more granular data on the scope, duration, and complexity of the technical evaluations involved. TEP chair roles can vary significantly, from overseeing a single large procurement to managing multiple smaller evaluations over a year. Given this is a one-year contract (364 days duration), $2.7 million translates to approximately $7,400 per day. This daily rate suggests a senior-level consultant or a team of consultants. For specialized technical expertise, especially in complex areas, this rate might be within market norms. However, without benchmarks for similar TEP chair services at HUD or comparable agencies, a definitive value assessment is difficult. It is crucial to understand if this rate reflects the market for the specific skills required.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected from Dynamic-Pro Inc. under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or detailed deliverables for Dynamic-Pro Inc. under this contract. Typically, for TEP Chair services, KPIs would focus on the timeliness and quality of technical evaluations, adherence to evaluation plans, fairness and impartiality of the review process, and the clarity of technical assessment reports. Deliverables might include documented technical evaluations, recommendations for award, and reports on the evaluation process. The 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' NAICS code suggests a broad scope, but the specific expectations for a TEP chair would be detailed in the Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) of the contract, which is not included here. Effective oversight would require clearly defined and measurable KPIs.

What is Dynamic-Pro Inc.'s track record with HUD or other federal agencies for similar consulting services?

Information regarding Dynamic-Pro Inc.'s specific track record with HUD or other federal agencies for similar Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) Chair services is not provided in the data. To assess their suitability and past performance, one would typically review contract award histories, past performance evaluations (if available through sources like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any debriefings from previous solicitations. Dynamic-Pro Inc.'s ability to win this $2.7 million contract suggests they possess the necessary qualifications and potentially a positive performance history. However, a deeper dive into their portfolio of completed federal contracts, client feedback, and any history of performance issues would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment.

Are there any specific risks identified with Dynamic-Pro Inc. as a contractor for this type of service?

The provided data does not explicitly identify any specific risks associated with Dynamic-Pro Inc. as a contractor for these TEP Chair services. Risk assessment would typically involve reviewing past performance, financial stability, any history of litigation or contract disputes, and the contractor's proposed approach to managing the work. Given the award was made under full and open competition, it implies that Dynamic-Pro Inc. met the technical and responsibility criteria set forth in the solicitation. However, potential risks common to consulting contracts, such as key personnel turnover, potential conflicts of interest, or challenges in meeting demanding timelines, should always be considered and managed through robust contract oversight by the agency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 86615526Q00006

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 11502 HENEGAN PL, SPOTSYLVANIA, VA, 22551

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,416,600

Exercised Options: $270,000

Current Obligation: $270,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0329X

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline