HUD awards $30.7M for NSPIRE inspection services to Capitol Management Consulting, emphasizing administrative management expertise

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,748,275 ($30.7M)

Contractor: Capitol Management Consulting Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development

Start Date: 2024-10-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $42.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: NSPIRE INSPECTION SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: COLONIAL BEACH, WESTMORELAND County, VIRGINIA, 22443

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated $30.7 million to CAPITOL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. for work described as: NSPIRE INSPECTION SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract focuses on administrative management and general management consulting, aligning with the agency's need for specialized support. 2. The award was made under a full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process. 3. A firm-fixed-price contract type indicates that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns. 4. The duration of the contract is 729 days, providing a medium-term engagement for services. 5. The base award amount is $4.2 million, with potential for significant growth over the contract period. 6. The contract is managed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) itself.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The base award of $4.2 million for the initial period appears reasonable given the scope of administrative management and general consulting services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting within federal agencies requires access to proprietary databases, but the contract type (firm fixed price) generally promotes cost control. The total potential value, while not fully detailed, suggests a significant investment in these services by HUD.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The number of bidders is not specified, but this method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service quality. The agency's decision to use full and open competition suggests confidence in the market's ability to provide suitable solutions.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is generally favorable for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for cost savings through competitive bidding and encourages a wider range of innovative solutions.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and its various programs, which will receive support in administrative and management functions. The services delivered will likely enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of HUD's operations, potentially leading to improved program delivery. The geographic impact is primarily national, as HUD operates across the United States, though specific project locations may vary. Workforce implications include the potential for employment opportunities within Capitol Management Consulting and its subcontractors, as well as impacts on HUD's internal administrative processes.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services sector (NAICS 541611). This sector is crucial for government operations, providing expertise in organizational efficiency, strategic planning, and operational support. Federal spending in this area is substantial, as agencies increasingly rely on external expertise to navigate complex administrative challenges and implement new management strategies. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing contracts for similar consulting services across various federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications mandated by a small business set-aside. However, the prime contractor may choose to engage small businesses as subcontractors to leverage specialized expertise or fulfill broader business objectives.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will be managed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which holds the contractor responsible for delivering services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated through federal contract databases where award details are published. Specific Inspector General jurisdiction would typically fall under HUD's Office of Inspector General.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

hud, administrative-management-consulting, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, management-support, virginia, federal-contract, consulting-services, nsPIRE, department-of-housing-and-urban-development

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded $30.7 million to CAPITOL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.. NSPIRE INSPECTION SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CAPITOL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development (Department of Housing and Urban Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the track record of Capitol Management Consulting Services, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly within HUD?

Capitol Management Consulting Services, Inc. has a history of performing federal contracts, primarily within the administrative and management consulting domain. While specific details on their performance with HUD require deeper database analysis, their presence in this sector suggests experience relevant to the current award. Federal procurement data typically tracks past performance, including contract values, agencies served, and any reported issues. A thorough review would involve examining their contract history for similar services, client satisfaction ratings, and any instances of contract disputes or terminations to fully assess their suitability and reliability for this significant award.

How does the awarded amount compare to similar administrative management consulting contracts within HUD or other federal agencies?

The base award of $4.2 million for the initial period of this contract, with a total potential value not fully disclosed but implied to be around $30.7 million over its term, needs to be benchmarked against comparable federal contracts. Similar engagements for administrative and general management consulting services can vary widely based on scope, duration, and specialized expertise required. Without access to proprietary contract databases that allow for direct comparison of services, pricing, and performance metrics, a precise valuation is challenging. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests an effort to contain costs, and the full and open competition process aims to secure competitive pricing. Further analysis would involve identifying contracts with similar NAICS codes (541611) and service descriptions across agencies like GSA, DOD, or HHS.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and risk mitigation strategies associated with this contract?

Key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract would likely revolve around the timely and accurate delivery of administrative management and general consulting services, adherence to project timelines, quality of deliverables, and client satisfaction. Risk mitigation strategies are embedded within the contract's structure and management. The firm-fixed-price (FFP) nature shifts cost overrun risks to the contractor. The full and open competition process helps mitigate risks associated with contractor selection by ensuring a broad pool of potential providers. HUD's oversight, including regular performance reviews and clear communication channels, will be crucial for identifying and addressing potential issues proactively. Specific risks might include scope creep, which would be managed through clear statement of work definitions and change control processes.

What is the historical spending pattern for NSPIRE inspection services or similar administrative support functions at HUD?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for NSPIRE inspection services or similar administrative support functions at HUD is crucial for understanding the context of this $30.7 million award. While 'NSPIRE' might refer to a specific initiative or program, the broader category of administrative management and general management consulting services (NAICS 541611) has seen consistent federal investment. Agencies like HUD often contract for such services to manage complex programs, improve operational efficiency, and implement policy changes. Historical data would reveal trends in contract values, duration, and the types of services procured. Understanding past spending can help assess whether this award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment in these support functions, and whether previous contracts achieved their intended outcomes.

What are the potential implications of this contract award on HUD's internal administrative capabilities and workforce?

This contract award for NSPIRE inspection services, valued at up to $30.7 million, has several potential implications for HUD's internal administrative capabilities and workforce. By outsourcing these functions to Capitol Management Consulting Services, Inc., HUD aims to leverage external expertise, potentially enhancing efficiency and freeing up internal resources. This could allow HUD staff to focus on core mission-critical activities rather than administrative tasks. However, it also means a reduced reliance on internal administrative personnel for these specific functions, which could impact workforce planning and development. The success of this contract will depend on effective knowledge transfer and collaboration between the contractor and HUD personnel to ensure seamless operations and maintain institutional knowledge.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 49 CREEK CURVE DR, COLONIAL BEACH, VA, 22443

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $58,234,123

Exercised Options: $30,748,275

Current Obligation: $30,748,275

Actual Outlays: $7,021,255

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 86614123A00002

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2024-10-01

Current End Date: 2026-09-30

Potential End Date: 2027-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-09-23

Other Department of Housing and Urban Development Contracts

View all Department of Housing and Urban Development contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending