NASA's Stennis Space Center awards $10.5M contract for protective services to Chenega Global Protection
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,489 ($10.5K)
Contractor: Chenega Global Protection, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2021-12-01
End Date: 2026-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,764 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: STENNIS SPACE CENTER (SSC) PROTECTIVE SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: STENNIS SPACE CENTER, HANCOCK County, MISSISSIPPI, 39529
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $10,488.55 to CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC for work described as: STENNIS SPACE CENTER (SSC) PROTECTIVE SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in facility security and personnel safety. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract (over 4 years) indicates a need for sustained security operations. 4. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide budget predictability. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561612 points to specialized security guard services. 6. The contract's geographic focus is Mississippi, specifically Stennis Space Center.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $10.5 million over approximately four years for protective services at a major NASA facility appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar contracts for security services at large federal installations suggests this pricing is within expected ranges. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, although it places the risk of cost overruns on the contractor. Without specific details on the scope of services and personnel required, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the competitive nature of the award implies a degree of price efficiency.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' indicating that proposals were solicited from all eligible responsible sources. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, this procurement method generally fosters robust competition, which is beneficial for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive offers. The exclusion of sources clause might suggest specific requirements that limited the pool initially, but the overall 'full and open' designation implies a broad solicitation.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces. This approach maximizes the opportunity to secure high-quality services at the best possible price.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are NASA's Stennis Space Center personnel and assets, ensuring a secure operating environment. The contract delivers essential security guard and patrol services, including access control, surveillance, and emergency response. The geographic impact is localized to the Stennis Space Center facility in Mississippi. The contract supports jobs within the private security sector, contributing to the local and national workforce.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for contractor performance issues impacting security operations if not adequately managed.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical security functions requires robust oversight.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market for these services.
- Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- Long-term contract duration allows for stable security operations and potential for contractor efficiency gains.
Sector Analysis
The security services sector is a significant component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. Federal agencies, particularly those with critical infrastructure like NASA, represent a substantial market for these services. This contract for protective services at Stennis Space Center aligns with the government's ongoing need for physical security and personnel protection. Comparable spending benchmarks for security services at large federal facilities often range from millions to tens of millions of dollars annually, depending on the size and complexity of the installation.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Chenega Global Protection, LLC, is likely a large business. This means that opportunities for small business subcontracting would depend on the prime contractor's own subcontracting plan and goals, rather than a direct government mandate for a set-aside. The absence of a small business set-aside suggests that the primary focus was on securing the most competitive offer from the broadest possible pool of contractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) contracting officer and their appointed representatives. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract's performance work statement (PWS), outlining specific service requirements and performance standards. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases and public reporting mechanisms. While specific Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction is not detailed here, NASA's Office of Inspector General would have oversight authority over potential fraud, waste, and abuse related to this contract.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Security Services
- Federal Protective Services
- Department of Homeland Security Protective Services
- General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Supply Schedule Contracts for Security
Risk Flags
- Contract performance risk
- Personnel security risk
- Operational disruption risk
Tags
nasa, stennis-space-center, protective-services, security-guards, chenega-global-protection, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, mississippi, federal-contract, space-exploration, facility-security
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $10,488.55 to CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC. STENNIS SPACE CENTER (SSC) PROTECTIVE SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10,488.55.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2021-12-01. End: 2026-09-30.
What is the track record of Chenega Global Protection, LLC, in providing similar protective services to federal agencies?
Chenega Global Protection, LLC, is part of the larger Chenega Corporation, which has a significant presence in providing security and other services to federal agencies. Information available through federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) would detail their past performance on similar contracts, including contract values, agencies served, and performance ratings. A review of these records would reveal their experience in areas such as physical security, access control, guard services, and potentially specialized security operations relevant to a space center environment. Assessing their past performance is crucial to understanding their capability to meet the requirements of this NASA contract effectively and reliably.
How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar security services in Mississippi?
Benchmarking the awarded price against market rates for similar security services in Mississippi requires access to detailed labor cost data, prevailing wage rates, and industry-specific pricing models. Factors such as the number of personnel required, hours of coverage, required security clearances, specialized equipment, and the specific threat environment at Stennis Space Center all influence pricing. While the contract is 'firm fixed price,' indicating a negotiated rate, comparing it to publicly available data on security guard services in the region, or to rates charged by other contractors for comparable federal facilities, would provide context. The 'full and open competition' aspect suggests the price is likely competitive within the market, but a precise comparison would necessitate a deeper dive into specific service components and regional cost structures.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract?
The specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract are detailed within the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and the contract itself. Typically, for protective services, KPIs would include metrics related to response times for incidents, effectiveness of access control (e.g., number of unauthorized entries prevented), patrol effectiveness (e.g., coverage adherence), personnel reliability and training compliance, and incident reporting accuracy. SLAs would define the expected standards for these metrics, often with associated remedies or penalties for non-performance. NASA would monitor these KPIs closely to ensure the contractor is meeting the required security standards for Stennis Space Center.
What is the historical spending pattern for protective services at Stennis Space Center?
To analyze historical spending patterns for protective services at Stennis Space Center, one would need to examine past contract awards for similar services at this facility over several fiscal years. This would involve querying federal procurement databases for contracts with NAICS codes related to security services (like 561612) awarded to Stennis Space Center. By aggregating the total value of these contracts and their durations, one could identify trends in spending, fluctuations in contract values, and the incumbent contractors. This analysis would help determine if the current $10.5 million award is consistent with, higher than, or lower than previous investments in protective services at the facility, providing context for the current expenditure.
Are there any specific risks identified by NASA or the contractor regarding the performance of these protective services?
Specific risks related to the performance of protective services at Stennis Space Center would typically be identified during the contract planning and solicitation phases. For NASA, risks might include potential security breaches, contractor personnel misconduct, failure to respond adequately to emergencies, or disruptions to facility operations. For the contractor, Chenega Global Protection, LLC, risks could involve underestimating labor costs, challenges in recruiting and retaining qualified personnel, unforeseen security threats, or changes in NASA's operational requirements. The contract's firm fixed-price nature shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor. NASA's oversight mechanisms, including performance monitoring and quality assurance surveillance plans, are designed to mitigate these identified risks.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 14420 ALBEMARLE POINT PL STE 100, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $75,000
Exercised Options: $75,000
Current Obligation: $10,489
Actual Outlays: $4,525
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80KSC022DA001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2021-12-01
Current End Date: 2026-09-30
Potential End Date: 2026-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-08
More Contracts from Chenega Global Protection, LLC
- Armed Security Guards for Atlanta&ft. Collins — $110.1M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- ATL FT Collins Guards Bridge — $33.3M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Base Award for Security and Access Control Services in Support of Usag-Ka — $26.3M (Department of Defense)
- Services — $23.9M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Nasa Protective Services Contract - South Region (npsc-Sr) KSC Task Order for Baseline and Pre-Priced Items — $16.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →