Nasa's $100M Sacom Contract Awarded to Syncom Space Services LLC for Facilities Support
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $100,136,374 ($100.1M)
Contractor: Syncom Space Services LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2023-02-02
End Date: 2025-06-30
Contract Duration: 879 days
Daily Burn Rate: $113.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: SYNERGY - ACHIEVING CONSILIDATED OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SACOM)
Place of Performance
Location: STENNIS SPACE CENTER, HANCOCK County, MISSISSIPPI, 39529
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $100.1 million to SYNCOM SPACE SERVICES LLC for work described as: SYNERGY - ACHIEVING CONSILIDATED OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SACOM) Key points: 1. The contract value is substantial at $100.14 million. 2. SYNCOM SPACE SERVICES LLC secured this award. 3. The contract falls under Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210). 4. It was awarded under full and open competition. 5. The contract type is Cost Plus Incentive Fee.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's Cost Plus Incentive Fee structure aims to align contractor performance with NASA's objectives, potentially leading to cost savings if targets are met. Benchmarking against similar facilities support contracts is necessary for a definitive value assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
Awarded through full and open competition, this method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows for a broad range of potential contractors to bid. The delivery order structure suggests it may be part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process is designed to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for essential facilities support services.
Public Impact
Ensures continued operation and maintenance of critical NASA facilities. Supports NASA's mission by providing essential infrastructure services. Creates jobs and economic activity within the Mississippi region. The incentive fee structure could lead to cost efficiencies for taxpayers.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Incentive Fee contracts require careful monitoring to ensure cost control.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical facilities support could pose a risk if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
- Clear objectives for operations and maintenance are likely defined.
- The contract duration extends into mid-2025, providing stability.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services is a broad category encompassing maintenance, repair, and operational support for government facilities. Spending in this sector is consistent across federal agencies, with benchmarks varying based on facility size, complexity, and geographic location.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business subcontracting opportunities are included or if there were small businesses involved in the competitive bidding process.
Oversight & Accountability
NASA's procurement processes are subject to oversight by the Inspector General and potentially congressional committees. The use of incentive fees suggests a focus on performance-based outcomes, which aids accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in CPIF contracts.
- Dependency on a single contractor for critical services.
- Lack of small business prime awardee.
- Need for detailed performance metric tracking.
Tags
facilities-support-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, ms, delivery-order, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $100.1 million to SYNCOM SPACE SERVICES LLC. SYNERGY - ACHIEVING CONSILIDATED OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SACOM)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SYNCOM SPACE SERVICES LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $100.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-02-02. End: 2025-06-30.
What specific performance metrics are tied to the incentive fee structure, and how will they be measured to ensure optimal value for the government?
The specific performance metrics for the incentive fee are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, these metrics would relate to operational efficiency, facility uptime, response times for maintenance requests, energy conservation, and safety compliance. NASA would establish clear Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and a robust measurement and verification process to track contractor performance against these metrics, ensuring that incentives are earned only for demonstrable improvements and adherence to standards.
What are the potential risks associated with a Cost Plus Incentive Fee contract for facilities support, and how are they mitigated?
Risks in CPIF contracts include potential for cost overruns if targets are not well-defined or if the government's share of cost savings is insufficient to motivate the contractor. Mitigation involves rigorous baseline cost estimation, clear and measurable performance objectives, strong government oversight of expenditures, and a well-structured incentive formula that appropriately balances risk and reward for both parties.
How does this contract contribute to NASA's overall mission effectiveness and long-term strategic goals?
This contract is crucial for maintaining the operational readiness and safety of NASA's physical infrastructure, which directly supports research, development, and mission execution. By ensuring reliable facilities support, it allows scientists and engineers to focus on their core tasks without disruption, thereby contributing to the agency's ability to achieve its scientific and exploratory objectives.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: PAE Government Services Inc.
Address: 1320 N COURTHOUSE RD STE 700, ARLINGTON, VA, 22201
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $102,711,387
Exercised Options: $102,711,387
Current Obligation: $100,136,374
Actual Outlays: $98,511,670
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 45
Total Subaward Amount: $7,843,680
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNS15AA01C
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-02-02
Current End Date: 2025-06-30
Potential End Date: 2025-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-06
More Contracts from Syncom Space Services LLC
- Synergy-Achieving Consolidated Operations and Maintenance, Cost Plus Incentive FEE - Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity — $817.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Synergy-Achieving Consolidated Operations and Maintenance, Cost Plus Incentive FEE, Core Work — $391.8M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Synergy-Achieving Consolidated Operations and Maintenance, Firm Fixed Price, Core Work — $120.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Synergy-Achieving Consolidated Operations and Maintenance, Cost Plus Incentive FEE - Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity — $108.3M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Synergy-Achieving Consolidated Operations and Maintenance, Firm Fixed Price-Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity — $20.4M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →