NASA awards $65K for electrical materials, highlighting a competitive procurement for essential supplies
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $65,156 ($65.2K)
Contractor: Kelly & Hayes Electrical Supply of L.I., Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2026-04-09
End Date: 2026-04-30
Contract Duration: 21 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.1K/day
Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 24
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: ELECTRICAL MATERIALS FOR RECEPTACLES IN ZONE A
Place of Performance
Location: NESCONSET, SUFFOLK County, NEW YORK, 11767
State: New York Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $65,156 to KELLY & HAYES ELECTRICAL SUPPLY OF L.I., INC. for work described as: ELECTRICAL MATERIALS FOR RECEPTACLES IN ZONE A Key points: 1. The contract value of $65,156 is relatively small, suggesting a focus on specific, localized needs. 2. Procurement through SAP indicates a streamlined process for smaller value acquisitions. 3. The short duration of 21 days points to an urgent or immediate requirement for these materials. 4. The industry classification 'Current-Carrying Wiring Device Manufacturing' places this purchase within a specialized segment of the electrical supply chain. 5. The award to a single supplier, Kelly & Hayes Electrical Supply of L.I., Inc., warrants a review of the competitive process. 6. The fixed-price contract type offers cost certainty for the agency.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $65,156 for electrical materials appears reasonable given the specific nature of the items and the short delivery period. Benchmarking against similar small-value procurements for electrical supplies by NASA or other agencies would provide further context. However, without detailed itemization, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The fixed-price nature of the award helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the agency.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), which is typically used for procurements valued below the simplified acquisition threshold. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, SAP generally encourages broad competition for smaller purchases. The fact that it was competed suggests that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid, which should lead to competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of competitive procedures, even under SAP, is beneficial for taxpayers as it helps ensure that the government is not overpaying for goods and services.
Public Impact
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) benefits from the timely acquisition of essential electrical materials. These materials are likely for maintaining or upgrading electrical infrastructure at a NASA facility. The geographic impact is localized to New York, where Kelly & Hayes Electrical Supply is based. The contract supports the operational readiness of NASA's facilities and potentially the workforce involved in electrical maintenance.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific detail on the exact electrical materials procured makes it difficult to fully assess value.
- The limited duration of the contract could indicate a potential for rushed delivery or unforeseen logistical challenges.
- While competed, the number of bidders is not specified, leaving room for potential under-competition.
Positive Signals
- Procurement was conducted through a competitive process under SAP, indicating adherence to acquisition regulations.
- The firm fixed-price contract type provides cost predictability for the agency.
- The award supports a business within the electrical supply sector.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the electrical equipment and supplies manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on current-carrying wiring devices. This is a mature industry with numerous suppliers. NASA's spending in this area is likely for maintenance, repair, and operations (MRO) at its facilities, rather than for large-scale new construction or research equipment. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing MRO budgets across federal agencies for similar types of electrical components.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). However, as a small value procurement under SAP, it is possible that small businesses were among the bidders. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any subcontracting opportunities were generated or if the prime contractor is a small business itself.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this purchase would primarily fall under NASA's internal procurement and financial management systems. As a purchase order under SAP, it is subject to standard agency review processes. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- Electrical Supplies Procurement
- General Services Administration (GSA) Schedules for Electrical Equipment
- Department of Defense Electrical Material Purchases
Risk Flags
- Potential for limited competition due to SAP procedures
- Lack of detailed itemization for precise value assessment
- Short contract duration may imply urgency or logistical constraints
Tags
nasa, electrical-materials, purchase-order, competed, fixed-price, new-york, simplified-acquisition-procedures, wiring-device-manufacturing, small-value, maintenance-repair-operations
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $65,156 to KELLY & HAYES ELECTRICAL SUPPLY OF L.I., INC.. ELECTRICAL MATERIALS FOR RECEPTACLES IN ZONE A
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KELLY & HAYES ELECTRICAL SUPPLY OF L.I., INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $65,156.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-04-30.
What is the specific breakdown of electrical materials being purchased and their intended use within NASA?
The provided data does not specify the exact breakdown of electrical materials. It is categorized broadly as 'ELECTRICAL MATERIALS FOR RECEPTACLES IN ZONE A'. The intended use is likely for maintenance, repair, or minor upgrades of electrical infrastructure within a designated 'Zone A' at a NASA facility. This could include items such as outlets, junction boxes, wiring, and associated hardware. Without a detailed list or statement of work, the precise application remains general. Further inquiry with NASA procurement officers or the contracting officer's representative would be necessary to obtain a granular understanding of the specific items and their operational purpose.
How does the unit cost of these electrical materials compare to market rates or similar federal contracts?
The provided data does not include unit costs, only the total contract value of $65,156. To compare unit costs, one would need the quantity of each item purchased and its corresponding price. Without this detailed breakdown, a direct unit cost comparison to market rates or similar federal contracts is not feasible. However, the overall contract value is relatively small, suggesting that the individual items are likely standard electrical components. A review of GSA Schedules or other agency contracts for similar receptacle materials could provide a benchmark, but this would require identifying comparable items and quantities.
What is the track record of Kelly & Hayes Electrical Supply, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly with NASA?
The provided data indicates that Kelly & Hayes Electrical Supply of L.I., Inc. was awarded this specific purchase order. To assess their track record, a search of federal procurement databases (like FPDS) would be necessary to identify any prior or subsequent contracts awarded to this vendor. Key metrics to examine would include the number of awards, total value of contracts, agencies served, and performance history (if available). A lack of extensive federal contract history might suggest this is a newer vendor to the federal space or primarily serves commercial markets. Conversely, a robust history would indicate established experience.
What are the potential risks associated with a short-duration contract for electrical materials?
A short duration of 21 days for delivery presents several potential risks. Firstly, there's a risk of expedited shipping costs, which might not be fully reflected in the fixed price, potentially impacting the vendor's margin or leading to quality compromises if rushed. Secondly, the tight timeline could limit the vendor's ability to source specialized materials, potentially leading to substitutions that may not be ideal or compliant. Thirdly, for NASA, a delay in receiving these materials could impact ongoing maintenance schedules or critical operations within 'Zone A'. Finally, if the procurement was urgent, it might indicate a failure in prior planning or an unforeseen operational need, suggesting underlying program management challenges.
How does this contract fit into NASA's overall spending on electrical supplies and infrastructure maintenance?
This contract, valued at $65,156, represents a very small portion of NASA's overall budget for infrastructure maintenance and supplies. NASA's total spending on electrical materials would encompass numerous larger contracts for new construction, major renovations, research equipment, and ongoing operational needs across its various centers. This specific purchase order appears to be for routine operational requirements or minor repairs. To understand its context, one would need to analyze NASA's historical spending trends on electrical supplies, identify the typical contract sizes and frequencies, and determine the proportion this award represents within the broader MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Operations) category.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Electrical Equipment and Component Manufacturing › Current-Carrying Wiring Device Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: ELECTRICAL/ELECTRONIC EQPT COMPNTS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Solicitation ID: 80NSSC26928671Q
Offers Received: 24
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 66 SOUTHERN BLVD, NESCONSET, NY, 11767
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $65,156
Exercised Options: $65,156
Current Obligation: $65,156
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-09
Current End Date: 2026-04-30
Potential End Date: 2026-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-09
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →