NASA awards $3.5M contract for electrical work, highlighting potential for cost efficiencies in facility upgrades
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $352,044 ($352.0K)
Contractor: MMR Constructors, Inc
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2025-12-15
End Date: 2026-04-17
Contract Duration: 123 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.9K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: HPIW - NET NEW - HPIW
Place of Performance
Location: BATON ROUGE, EAST BATON ROUGE County, LOUISIANA, 70817
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $352,044.09 to MMR CONSTRUCTORS, INC for work described as: HPIW - NET NEW - HPIW Key points: 1. Contract value suggests a focus on specific facility modernization needs. 2. Limited competition may impact price discovery and potentially increase costs. 3. Fixed-price contract type shifts risk to the contractor, potentially leading to more predictable project outcomes. 4. Short performance period indicates a targeted scope of work. 5. Geographic focus on Louisiana suggests regional infrastructure development. 6. The award to MMR Constructors, Inc. warrants a review of their past performance on similar federal contracts.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of approximately $3.5 million for electrical work appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized facility upgrades. However, without specific details on the scope of work, it is difficult to benchmark against similar contracts. The fixed-price nature of the award suggests an attempt to control costs, but the lack of competition could lead to a less favorable price than if multiple bids were considered. Further analysis would require detailed project specifications and comparable project costs within NASA or other federal agencies.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. The absence of a competitive bidding process means that NASA did not solicit proposals from multiple vendors. This approach can be justified for various reasons, such as urgency, unique capabilities, or specific existing relationships, but it limits the opportunity to explore a wider range of pricing and technical solutions. The lack of competition means that the government did not benefit from the price pressures that typically arise in a robust bidding environment.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not be receiving the best possible price due to the absence of competitive bidding. The government's ability to negotiate favorable terms is reduced when only one vendor is considered.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are NASA facilities in Louisiana requiring electrical system upgrades. The contract will deliver essential electrical contracting services, ensuring operational continuity and safety. The geographic impact is concentrated within Louisiana, supporting local infrastructure. The contract will likely involve a skilled electrical workforce, potentially creating or sustaining jobs in the region.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and reduced value for taxpayer funds.
- The sole-source nature of the award requires strong justification to ensure it was the most appropriate procurement method.
- Limited contract duration might indicate a narrowly defined scope, potentially leading to future, separate procurements for related work.
Positive Signals
- Fixed-price contract type helps to control costs and provides budget certainty for the agency.
- The award to a specific contractor suggests they possess the necessary qualifications and capacity for the required electrical work.
- The contract supports critical infrastructure maintenance and upgrades for a federal agency.
Sector Analysis
The electrical contractors and other wiring installation contractors sector is a vital part of the construction industry, supporting both public and private infrastructure development. Federal spending in this area often relates to maintaining and upgrading government facilities, research centers, and operational sites. This contract, valued at $3.5 million, falls within the typical range for specialized electrical work on federal projects. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend on the specific nature of the electrical upgrades, such as power distribution, lighting systems, or specialized wiring for sensitive equipment.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific benefits for the small business ecosystem stemming from this particular award. The primary contractor, MMR Constructors, Inc., will likely manage the project with its own resources or through larger, established supply chains, rather than through mandated small business subcontracting goals.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will be managed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). As a fixed-price purchase order, the primary accountability measure is the successful completion of the specified electrical work within the agreed-upon budget and timeframe. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected during the contract's performance or execution.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Facility Modernization Projects
- Federal Electrical Infrastructure Upgrades
- Construction and Engineering Services for Government Facilities
- Louisiana State Infrastructure Contracts
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award may limit price competition.
- Contract performance history of MMR Constructors, Inc. needs verification.
- Scope of work details are not provided, making value assessment difficult.
Tags
nasa, construction, electrical-contracting, louisiana, purchase-order, firm-fixed-price, sole-source, facility-maintenance, infrastructure-upgrade, mmr-constructors-inc
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $352,044.09 to MMR CONSTRUCTORS, INC. HPIW - NET NEW - HPIW
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MMR CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $352,044.09.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-12-15. End: 2026-04-17.
What is the specific scope of electrical work covered by this $3.5 million contract?
The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors' (NAICS 238210) awarded by NASA. However, the specific scope of work is not detailed. Typically, such contracts could encompass a range of activities including the installation, repair, and maintenance of electrical systems, power distribution, lighting, control systems, and specialized wiring for equipment. Given the fixed-price nature and the $3.5 million value, it likely involves a defined set of upgrades or installations at a specific NASA facility in Louisiana. A detailed statement of work would be required to fully understand the project's objectives and deliverables.
How does the $3.5 million contract value compare to similar electrical upgrade projects at NASA or other federal agencies?
Benchmarking the $3.5 million contract value requires detailed comparison with similar projects. Factors such as the size and type of facility, the complexity of the electrical systems being upgraded, and the specific scope of work (e.g., new installations vs. repairs, integration with existing systems) are crucial. Without these specifics, a direct comparison is challenging. However, for significant facility upgrades or new electrical system installations at federal sites, a $3.5 million contract is a substantial award, suggesting a project of considerable scale or complexity. A review of NASA's historical procurement data for similar electrical services, or data from agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA) or Department of Defense (DoD) for facility maintenance, would provide more context.
What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for this electrical contract?
The primary risk associated with a sole-source award is the potential for reduced value for taxpayer money. Without competition, the government may not achieve the most favorable pricing, as the selected contractor faces less pressure to offer competitive rates. There's also a risk that the contractor may not possess the absolute best or most innovative solution available in the market, as alternatives were not explored through a bidding process. Furthermore, sole-source awards can sometimes raise concerns about fairness and transparency in the procurement process, necessitating strong justification from the awarding agency to demonstrate that this method was indeed in the government's best interest and that no viable alternatives existed.
What is MMR Constructors, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly with NASA?
Information on MMR Constructors, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, especially with NASA, is crucial for assessing performance risk. A review of their past federal awards, including contract values, performance ratings, and any history of disputes or contract modifications, would provide insight into their reliability and capability. Specifically, examining their experience with similar electrical installation projects for government agencies would be most relevant. Positive past performance would indicate a lower risk for this current contract, while a history of issues could signal potential problems with cost overruns, schedule delays, or quality of work.
What are the historical spending patterns for electrical contracting services by NASA over the past five years?
Analyzing NASA's historical spending on electrical contracting services over the past five years would provide valuable context for this $3.5 million award. This would involve identifying the total annual expenditure on NAICS code 238210 and similar categories, the number of contracts awarded, the average contract value, and the distribution between competitive and sole-source procurements. Understanding these patterns can reveal trends in NASA's investment in facility infrastructure, identify key contractors, and highlight any significant shifts in procurement strategies. For instance, a rising trend in spending might indicate increased infrastructure needs, while a higher proportion of sole-source awards could signal challenges in the competitive landscape or specific agency priorities.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Building Equipment Contractors › Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - NETWORK
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Solicitation ID: 80NSSC26919531Q-1
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 15961 AIRLINE HWY, BATON ROUGE, LA, 70817
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $352,044
Exercised Options: $352,044
Current Obligation: $352,044
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-12-15
Current End Date: 2026-04-17
Potential End Date: 2026-04-17 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-09
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →