NASA awards $19.6M GitHub Enterprise renewal to Minburn Technology Group, extending services through May 2027
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $196,020 ($196.0K)
Contractor: Minburn Technology Group, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2026-05-01
End Date: 2027-04-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $539/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: GITHUB ENTERPRISE ANNUAL RENEWAL
Place of Performance
Location: GREAT FALLS, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22066
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $196,020 to MINBURN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC for work described as: GITHUB ENTERPRISE ANNUAL RENEWAL Key points: 1. Value for money assessed against market rates for similar enterprise software subscriptions. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process after initial source exclusion. 3. Risk indicators include contract duration and potential for vendor lock-in with enterprise software. 4. Performance context relies on successful delivery of previous contract periods. 5. Sector positioning within IT services, specifically software licensing and support.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $19.6 million for a one-year renewal of GitHub Enterprise appears reasonable when benchmarked against typical enterprise software licensing costs. While specific pricing details are not provided, the firm fixed-price structure suggests a predictable expense. Comparison to similar large-scale software agreements within the federal government would provide a more precise value assessment, but the amount is within expected ranges for such services.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' suggesting that while initial considerations may have focused on specific vendors, the opportunity was ultimately opened to all eligible bidders. The number of bidders is not specified, but this procurement method generally aims to maximize competition and achieve competitive pricing. The exclusion of sources phase warrants further examination to understand its justification and impact on the final competition.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition, even with an initial exclusion of sources phase, is generally favorable for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing and innovative solutions.
Public Impact
NASA developers and IT personnel benefit from continued access to GitHub Enterprise for software development and collaboration. Services delivered include software licensing, maintenance, and support for the GitHub platform. Geographic impact is nationwide, supporting NASA's distributed workforce. Workforce implications include enabling efficient software development workflows for NASA's technical staff.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for increased costs in future renewals if competition is not sustained.
- Dependence on a single vendor for critical software development infrastructure.
- Risk of vendor lock-in due to the specialized nature of enterprise software platforms.
Positive Signals
- Continued access to a widely adopted and robust software development platform.
- Stable pricing through a firm fixed-price contract for the duration.
- Support for NASA's mission-critical software development activities.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically focusing on software licensing and enterprise collaboration tools. The market for such platforms is dominated by a few major players, with GitHub being a significant entity. NASA's spending on this contract is a component of its broader IT infrastructure investments, which are crucial for enabling research, development, and operational activities across the agency. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other federal agencies' investments in similar enterprise software solutions.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a large enterprise software renewal, it is unlikely to involve significant subcontracting opportunities for small businesses directly related to the core GitHub platform licensing. The focus is on a large-scale enterprise solution rather than a contract vehicle typically used to engage the small business industrial base.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by NASA's contracting officers and program managers responsible for IT procurement and software asset management. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement databases where contract awards are published. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- NASA IT Software Procurement
- Enterprise Software Licensing
- Cloud-based Development Platforms
- Software as a Service (SaaS) Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for vendor lock-in
- Reliance on a single software provider
- Need for ongoing cost-benefit analysis
Tags
it, nasa, software-licensing, enterprise-software, github, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, it-services, cloud-services, minburn-technology-group, virginia
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $196,020 to MINBURN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC. GITHUB ENTERPRISE ANNUAL RENEWAL
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MINBURN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $196,020.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-05-01. End: 2027-04-30.
What is the historical spending trend for GitHub Enterprise at NASA?
Analyzing historical spending on GitHub Enterprise at NASA is crucial for understanding the long-term investment in this platform. While the provided data focuses on a single renewal, a comprehensive review would involve examining previous contract awards for GitHub Enterprise or similar services over the past 5-10 years. This would reveal trends in annual spending, identify any significant price increases or decreases, and highlight the consistency of the vendor relationship. Understanding these patterns helps in forecasting future budgetary needs and assessing whether current spending aligns with historical norms or represents a deviation that warrants further investigation into its drivers, such as expanded user base or new feature adoption.
How does the per-user cost of this GitHub Enterprise contract compare to other federal agencies or commercial entities?
Benchmarking the per-user cost of NASA's GitHub Enterprise contract against similar agreements in the federal government and the commercial sector is essential for evaluating value for money. Without specific user counts or detailed pricing tiers, a direct per-user calculation is difficult. However, if such data were available, it could be compared to publicly reported contract data from other agencies or industry reports on enterprise software pricing. Significant deviations from established benchmarks could indicate either an exceptionally good deal for the government or potential overspending. Factors like included features, support levels, and volume discounts heavily influence these comparisons, necessitating a nuanced analysis rather than a simple dollar-per-user metric.
What specific features or support levels are included in this GitHub Enterprise renewal, and how do they compare to standard offerings?
The specifics of the features and support levels included in NASA's GitHub Enterprise renewal are critical for assessing its value and ensuring it meets agency needs. Enterprise agreements often bundle various functionalities, including advanced security features, enhanced collaboration tools, dedicated support, and compliance certifications. Comparing these bundled offerings against GitHub's standard enterprise packages and potentially against competitor offerings (like GitLab or Bitbucket enterprise tiers) would reveal if NASA is receiving premium services, customized solutions, or simply a standard package at a negotiated rate. Understanding the scope of services ensures that the $19.6 million investment directly supports NASA's software development lifecycle and risk management requirements.
What is Minburn Technology Group's track record with NASA and other federal agencies for similar IT services?
Minburn Technology Group's track record with NASA and other federal agencies provides insight into their reliability and performance capabilities for delivering IT services. A review of their past contract history would reveal the types of services they have provided, the agencies they have served, and their performance ratings, if publicly available. Specifically, examining their experience with software licensing, enterprise platform support, and large-scale IT renewals would be most relevant. Positive performance on similar contracts suggests a lower risk of delivery issues for this GitHub Enterprise renewal. Conversely, a history of performance problems or contract disputes could signal potential challenges ahead, warranting closer monitoring.
What are the potential risks associated with a multi-year renewal of enterprise software like GitHub, and how are they mitigated?
Renewing enterprise software like GitHub for multiple years, as implied by the contract's end date, carries inherent risks. These include potential vendor lock-in, where switching to a competitor becomes prohibitively expensive or complex; the risk of paying for unused licenses or features if usage patterns change; and the possibility that the software's capabilities may not keep pace with evolving technological needs or alternative solutions. Mitigation strategies often involve negotiating flexible terms, conducting regular usage reviews, ensuring clear exit clauses, and maintaining awareness of the competitive landscape. NASA's contracting process should ideally incorporate mechanisms to periodically reassess the need for the platform and explore alternatives to ensure continued value and avoid long-term overcommitment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 9716 ARNON CHAPEL RD, GREAT FALLS, VA, 22066
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $196,020
Exercised Options: $196,020
Current Obligation: $196,020
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNG15SD34B
IDV Type: GWAC
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-05-01
Current End Date: 2027-04-30
Potential End Date: 2027-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-06
More Contracts from Minburn Technology Group, LLC
- Microsoft Licenses — $356.0M (Department of State)
- Ussocom Microsoft Enterprise Agreement for Microsoft License Software Assurance and NEW Licenses — $284.6M (Department of Defense)
- FY23 Usda Ocio Enterprise Solutions POP: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2023 — $234.7M (Department of Agriculture)
- VA Endpoints - Base Award With Options Exercised AT Award — $229.0M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Microsoft Software Licenses and Support (task Order 00004) — $173.0M (Department of the Treasury)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →