NASA awards $35,683 for Sound Level Calibrator to Hottinger Bruel & Kjaer Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $35,684 ($35.7K)
Contractor: Hottinger Bruel & Kjaer Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2026-01-21
End Date: 2026-04-24
Contract Duration: 93 days
Daily Burn Rate: $384/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: SOUND LEVEL CALIBRATOR (QTY1)
Place of Performance
Location: ORLANDO, BREVARD County, FLORIDA, 32899
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $35,683.5 to HOTTINGER BRUEL & KJAER INC. for work described as: SOUND LEVEL CALIBRATOR (QTY1) Key points: 1. Spending is for a specialized instrument manufacturing need. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting market availability. 3. The award is a delivery order under an existing contract. 4. No small business participation was noted.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The award amount of $35,683 for a single unit appears reasonable for specialized test equipment. Benchmarking against similar high-precision calibration instruments would provide further validation.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives fair value.
Taxpayer Impact: The relatively small contract value suggests a minimal direct impact on taxpayers, but efficient procurement practices are always beneficial.
Public Impact
Ensures NASA has calibrated equipment for accurate measurements. Supports scientific research and development activities. Procurement process appears standard for specialized equipment.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of small business participation.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition.
- Firm fixed price contract.
Sector Analysis
This purchase falls under the Instrument Manufacturing for Measuring and Testing Electricity and Electrical Signals category. Spending in this sector is driven by research, development, and operational needs across various government agencies.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates no small business participation in this specific award. Efforts to ensure small businesses can compete for similar future procurements may be warranted.
Oversight & Accountability
The award is a delivery order, suggesting it's part of a larger, pre-vetted contract. Oversight would focus on the terms of the base contract and the justification for this specific order.
Related Government Programs
- Instrument Manufacturing for Measuring and Testing Electricity and Electrical Signals
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- No small business participation.
- Potential reliance on specialized components.
- Delivery order under an existing contract may limit current price discovery.
Tags
instrument-manufacturing-for-measuring-a, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, fl, delivery-order, under-100k
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $35,683.5 to HOTTINGER BRUEL & KJAER INC.. SOUND LEVEL CALIBRATOR (QTY1)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HOTTINGER BRUEL & KJAER INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $35,683.5.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-01-21. End: 2026-04-24.
What is the typical lifespan and calibration frequency for this type of sound level calibrator?
The typical lifespan for a high-quality sound level calibrator can range from 5 to 10 years, depending on usage and maintenance. Calibration frequency is usually recommended annually or bi-annually, as specified by the manufacturer and relevant industry standards, to ensure continued accuracy and reliability of measurements.
Are there any known supply chain risks associated with this specific manufacturer or instrument type?
While the data doesn't specify, potential supply chain risks for specialized electronic instruments can include reliance on single-source components, geopolitical instability affecting raw material sourcing, or manufacturing disruptions. A review of Hottinger Bruel & Kjaer Inc.'s supply chain transparency and contingency plans would be prudent.
How does the performance of this calibrator compare to other models available on the market?
Performance comparisons would depend on specific technical specifications like accuracy class, frequency response range, and stability. Hottinger Bruel & Kjaer is a reputable brand known for high-precision instruments. However, a detailed technical comparison against competing models would be necessary to fully assess its relative performance advantages.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Navigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments Manufacturing › Instrument Manufacturing for Measuring and Testing Electricity and Electrical Signals
Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 19 BARTLETT ST, MARLBOROUGH, MA, 01752
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign Owned, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $35,684
Exercised Options: $35,684
Current Obligation: $35,684
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47QSMS24D009Y
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-01-21
Current End Date: 2026-04-24
Potential End Date: 2026-04-24 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-10
More Contracts from Hottinger Bruel & Kjaer Inc.
- FY26 Ideas Renewal — $43.7K (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →