NASA awards $2.15M contract for protective services at Langley Research Center to Chenega Global Protection
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,153,184 ($2.2M)
Contractor: Chenega Global Protection, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2026-03-01
End Date: 2027-02-28
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: NASA PROTECTIVE SERVICES-EASTERN REGION (NPS-ER), CONTRACT YEAR (CY) 4 LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER (LARC) BASELINE SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: HAMPTON, HAMPTON CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23681
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $2.2 million to CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC for work described as: NASA PROTECTIVE SERVICES-EASTERN REGION (NPS-ER), CONTRACT YEAR (CY) 4 LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER (LARC) BASELINE SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract focuses on security guard and patrol services, a critical function for research facilities. 2. The award is a delivery order under a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. 3. Pricing structure is firm-fixed-price, providing cost certainty for the agency. 4. The contract duration is one year, suggesting a need for ongoing, but potentially re-competed, services. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561612 indicates a specialized security service sector. 6. The contract is not set aside for small businesses, implying a focus on larger, established providers.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $2.15 million for a one-year period for protective services at a major research center appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar security contracts for federal facilities of comparable size and scope would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs for NASA. Without specific details on the scope of services and personnel required, a definitive comparison to market rates is challenging, but the amount is within expected ranges for such specialized security operations.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' indicating that while the initial contract vehicle may have had some restrictions, this specific delivery order was competed broadly. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' nature suggests a competitive process was intended. This approach generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more innovative solutions compared to sole-source awards.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs and encouraging high-quality service delivery through market forces.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are NASA's Langley Research Center personnel and assets, ensuring a secure environment for critical research and development. Services delivered include security guards and patrol operations to protect government property and personnel. The geographic impact is localized to NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia. The contract supports jobs within the private security sector, contributing to the local economy in the Hampton Roads region.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for service degradation if contractor's staffing levels or training are insufficient.
- Risk of security breaches if patrol routes or surveillance are not adequately maintained.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical security functions could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the agency.
- Awarded under a competitive process, suggesting potential for good value.
- Contract duration allows for consistent service delivery over the specified period.
Sector Analysis
The security services sector is a significant component of the federal contracting landscape, encompassing a wide range of protective measures for government facilities and assets. This contract falls within the security guards and patrol services sub-sector (NAICS 561612). Federal spending in this area is substantial, driven by the need to protect sensitive research, operational, and administrative sites across various agencies. The market includes numerous established providers, ranging from large defense contractors to specialized security firms. This award to Chenega Global Protection, LLC, fits within the broader trend of agencies outsourcing security functions to specialized private sector entities.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, as indicated by 'sb': false. The award to Chenega Global Protection, LLC, a company that may or may not be a small business itself (further verification needed), suggests that the competition was open to all qualified offerors. There is no explicit mention of small business subcontracting requirements in the provided data. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract may be limited unless the prime contractor voluntarily includes them in their subcontracting plan.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the NASA contracting officer and the program office at Langley Research Center. Performance standards and deliverables are typically outlined in the contract's statement of work. Accountability is enforced through contract clauses, performance reviews, and the potential for remedies if the contractor fails to meet requirements. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like SAM.gov, although detailed performance metrics are often internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Protective Services Contracts
- Federal Security Guard Services
- Research Center Security
- Chenega Global Protection Contracts
- Langley Research Center Operations
Risk Flags
- Potential for performance issues if contractor staffing is inadequate.
- Risk associated with reliance on a single provider for critical security functions.
- Need for ongoing monitoring of service quality and adherence to security protocols.
Tags
nasa, protective-services, security-guards, langley-research-center, chenega-global-protection, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, virginia, aerospace, research-and-development, federal-contracting
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $2.2 million to CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC. NASA PROTECTIVE SERVICES-EASTERN REGION (NPS-ER), CONTRACT YEAR (CY) 4 LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER (LARC) BASELINE SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-03-01. End: 2027-02-28.
What is the historical spending pattern for protective services at NASA's Langley Research Center?
Analyzing historical spending for protective services at Langley Research Center requires accessing historical contract data. Typically, agencies like NASA procure security services through a combination of IDIQ vehicles and specific delivery orders or task orders. Spending can fluctuate based on evolving security needs, changes in facility size or operations, and the competitive landscape. For instance, if previous contracts were for longer durations or included broader scopes of work, the annual spending might differ. A review of past awards for NAICS code 561612 at LARC would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and incumbent contractors, providing context for the current $2.15 million award. This allows for an assessment of whether current spending represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment in protective services.
How does the cost per guard or per hour for this contract compare to industry benchmarks?
Determining the precise cost per guard or per hour requires knowing the number of personnel assigned to this contract and their allocated hours, which are not detailed in the provided summary. However, the total contract value of $2.15 million over approximately 365 days suggests a significant operational presence. Industry benchmarks for security guards can vary widely based on location, skill level (e.g., armed vs. unarmed, specialized training), and the specific services required (e.g., access control, patrol, emergency response). For a firm-fixed-price contract of this nature, NASA would have evaluated proposed labor rates and overhead against internal estimates and market data during the procurement process. Without the specific labor mix and hours, a direct comparison is difficult, but the agency's procurement process aims to secure competitive rates.
What is Chenega Global Protection, LLC's track record with NASA and other federal agencies for similar services?
Chenega Global Protection, LLC, is a known federal contractor, often performing security and base support services across various government agencies. A review of their contract history with NASA and other departments (such as the Department of Defense or Department of Homeland Security) would reveal their performance on similar protective service contracts. Key indicators to examine include past performance evaluations, any history of contract disputes or terminations, and the scale and complexity of previously awarded contracts. Agencies typically use past performance information as a significant factor in source selection. Chenega's ability to secure this NASA contract suggests a satisfactory or better performance record in relevant service areas.
What are the specific security risks at Langley Research Center that this contract is intended to mitigate?
Langley Research Center (LaRC) is a vital NASA facility involved in aeronautics and space research, housing sensitive equipment, intellectual property, and critical infrastructure. The security risks likely encompass unauthorized access, theft of government property or sensitive data, sabotage, and ensuring the safety of personnel and visitors. Protective services, including guards and patrols, are designed to deter potential threats, detect intrusions, respond to incidents, and maintain order. The specific mitigation strategies employed would involve physical security measures, surveillance, access control points, and rapid response protocols, all managed and executed by the contracted security personnel under the direction of NASA security management.
Are there any performance metrics or key performance indicators (KPIs) associated with this contract?
While specific performance metrics are not detailed in the provided summary, federal contracts for security services invariably include Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and performance standards within the Statement of Work (SOW). These metrics are crucial for ensuring the contractor meets the agency's requirements. Common KPIs for protective services might include response times to alarms or incidents, adherence to patrol schedules, effectiveness of access control procedures, incident reporting accuracy and timeliness, and personnel appearance and conduct standards. NASA would monitor these KPIs throughout the contract period, and performance evaluations would inform future contract awards or renewals.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 14420 ALBEMARLE POINT PL STE 100, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $3,691,174
Exercised Options: $3,691,174
Current Obligation: $2,153,184
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80GSFC23DA004
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-03-01
Current End Date: 2027-02-28
Potential End Date: 2027-02-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-23
More Contracts from Chenega Global Protection, LLC
- Armed Security Guards for Atlanta&ft. Collins — $110.1M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- ATL FT Collins Guards Bridge — $33.3M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Base Award for Security and Access Control Services in Support of Usag-Ka — $26.3M (Department of Defense)
- Services — $23.9M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Nasa Protective Services Contract - South Region (npsc-Sr) KSC Task Order for Baseline and Pre-Priced Items — $16.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →