NASA's $11.5M fire services contract for KSC awarded to Chenega Global Protection, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,455,858 ($11.5M)
Contractor: Chenega Global Protection, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2025-10-01
End Date: 2026-09-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $31.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: NASA FIRE SERVICES CONTRACT - KSC PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND BASELINE FIRE SERVICES FOR FY26
Place of Performance
Location: ORLANDO, BREVARD County, FLORIDA, 32899
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $11.5 million to CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC for work described as: NASA FIRE SERVICES CONTRACT - KSC PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND BASELINE FIRE SERVICES FOR FY26 Key points: 1. Contract aims to ensure baseline fire services and program management for Kennedy Space Center. 2. Awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, indicating predictable costs for the government. 3. The contract duration is one year, aligning with fiscal year 2026 requirements. 4. This service supports critical infrastructure and personnel safety at a key NASA facility. 5. The procurement method suggests a competitive process was utilized. 6. The contract value is modest relative to the scale of NASA's operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $11.5 million for a full year of fire services and program management at a major NASA facility like Kennedy Space Center appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar contracts for base support services at large federal installations suggests this is within expected ranges. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs, though it places the risk of cost overruns on the contractor. Without specific details on the scope of services and personnel required, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the price seems competitive for the essential services provided.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which typically means the solicitation was broadly advertised, but specific sources may have been excluded based on pre-qualification or other criteria. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation implies a robust competitive process was intended. This approach generally fosters price discovery and encourages multiple vendors to submit proposals, leading to potentially better pricing and service offerings for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs and encouraging high-quality service delivery through market forces.
Public Impact
Benefits NASA personnel and facilities at Kennedy Space Center by ensuring safety and operational continuity. Provides essential fire suppression, emergency response, and fire prevention services. Supports the ongoing space exploration and research missions conducted at KSC. Contributes to the safety and security of the Florida Space Coast region. Maintains a skilled workforce of emergency responders and program managers.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if baseline services are not clearly defined.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical safety services requires robust performance monitoring.
- Contract duration of one year may limit long-term strategic planning for fire services.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Award to an established company suggests a degree of reliability.
- Full and open competition generally leads to better value.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the broader 'Support Services' sector, specifically focusing on emergency response and facility management. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous companies offering specialized capabilities to government agencies. NASA's need for fire services at its launch and research facilities is critical for safety and operational integrity. Comparable spending benchmarks for base operations and support services at large federal installations can vary significantly based on geographic location, facility size, and the specific range of services required.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the data indicates no specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses were mandated in this award. This suggests that the primary contractor, Chenega Global Protection, LLC, will likely perform the majority of the work. The absence of small business set-asides means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract are limited, though they may compete for other contracts within NASA or the broader federal support services market.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by NASA's contracting officers and program managers at Kennedy Space Center. Performance will be monitored against the terms and conditions of the firm-fixed-price contract, including service level agreements and response times. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. While specific Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction for this particular contract isn't detailed, the NASA OIG has broad authority to investigate fraud, waste, and abuse in NASA programs and contracts.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Base Operations Support Contracts
- Federal Emergency Response Services
- Kennedy Space Center Support Services
- Government Facility Management Contracts
Risk Flags
- Contract duration is limited to one year, potentially impacting long-term service planning and contractor investment.
- Specific details on the number of bidders and evaluation criteria for 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' are not provided, limiting full assessment of competition dynamics.
- Performance metrics and historical performance data for the contractor in similar roles are not detailed.
Tags
nasa, fire-services, emergency-response, facility-management, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, chenega-global-protection-llc, kennedy-space-center, florida, support-services, fy26
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $11.5 million to CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC. NASA FIRE SERVICES CONTRACT - KSC PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND BASELINE FIRE SERVICES FOR FY26
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.
What is Chenega Global Protection, LLC's track record with NASA and similar federal agencies for providing fire and emergency services?
Chenega Global Protection, LLC, is a subsidiary of Chenega Corporation, a large, Alaska Native-owned company that holds numerous federal contracts across various service areas, including security, facilities management, and emergency response. While specific details on their performance history for NASA fire services require deeper investigation into contract databases like FPDS or SAM.gov, the company's extensive portfolio suggests significant experience in government contracting. They have been awarded contracts with agencies such as the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, and other civilian agencies. Their ability to secure this NASA contract indicates they likely meet the agency's performance and reliability standards. A thorough review would involve examining past performance evaluations, any reported disputes, and the scope of services previously rendered to NASA or comparable entities to fully assess their suitability and track record for this specific requirement.
How does the awarded value of $11.5 million compare to historical spending on fire services at Kennedy Space Center?
To accurately compare the $11.5 million award to historical spending, one would need to access NASA's historical contract data for fire services at Kennedy Space Center (KSC) over previous fiscal years. This would involve searching databases like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or USAspending.gov for contracts with similar scopes of work (e.g., 'fire protection,' 'emergency services,' 'base support') awarded to KSC. It's important to adjust for inflation if comparing values across different years. The current award is for a single fiscal year (FY26). If previous contracts were multi-year or had different scopes, direct comparison requires careful normalization. For instance, if previous annual costs were in the $8-10 million range (adjusted for inflation), then $11.5 million might represent an increase, potentially due to expanded services, increased labor costs, or market rate adjustments. Conversely, if historical spending was higher, this award could represent cost savings or a reduction in service scope.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Primary risks for this contract include potential service disruptions if the contractor fails to meet performance standards, cost overruns if the firm-fixed-price model proves inadequate for unforeseen circumstances, and safety incidents due to inadequate fire prevention or response. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract oversight by NASA personnel, including regular performance reviews, site inspections, and adherence to strict service level agreements. The firm-fixed-price structure itself mitigates cost risk for the government by capping the total expenditure. For safety risks, the contract likely mandates specific certifications, training, and equipment standards for the contractor's personnel, alongside clear emergency protocols. NASA's ability to enforce contract clauses, including termination for default, serves as a significant leverage point to ensure contractor compliance and mitigate performance-related risks.
How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method in ensuring value for taxpayer money in this context?
The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method aims to balance broad market access with specific requirements. By excluding certain sources, NASA might be targeting contractors with proven capabilities or specific clearances necessary for KSC operations, potentially reducing risk and ensuring a higher caliber of service. However, if the exclusions are too narrow or not well-justified, it could limit competition, potentially leading to higher prices than true full and open competition. The effectiveness in ensuring value hinges on whether the exclusions were necessary and if a sufficient number of qualified bidders still participated. If the competition was robust despite exclusions, it likely yielded good value. If it resulted in fewer bidders or a less competitive landscape, the value proposition might be diminished compared to a completely open solicitation.
What are the potential workforce implications of this contract award for the Florida Space Coast?
This contract award to Chenega Global Protection, LLC, will likely sustain or create jobs for firefighters, emergency medical technicians, fire inspectors, program managers, and administrative support staff in the Florida Space Coast region. The number of positions depends on the specific scope and scale of services required by NASA. If Chenega Global Protection, LLC, is an incumbent or has a local presence, the impact might involve retaining existing jobs. If they are a new entrant or expanding their operations, it could lead to new job creation. The contract's duration (one year) might influence the stability of these jobs, potentially favoring local hires or those willing to work on shorter-term contracts. The demand for skilled emergency response personnel is generally consistent, contributing to the local economy and specialized labor market.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Other Support Services › All Other Support Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 14420 ALBEMARLE POINT PL STE 100, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $11,455,858
Exercised Options: $11,455,858
Current Obligation: $11,455,858
Actual Outlays: $3,818,619
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80KSC022DA002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-10-01
Current End Date: 2026-09-30
Potential End Date: 2026-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-24
More Contracts from Chenega Global Protection, LLC
- Armed Security Guards for Atlanta&ft. Collins — $110.1M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- ATL FT Collins Guards Bridge — $33.3M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Base Award for Security and Access Control Services in Support of Usag-Ka — $26.3M (Department of Defense)
- Services — $23.9M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Nasa Protective Services Contract - South Region (npsc-Sr) KSC Task Order for Baseline and Pre-Priced Items — $16.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →