NASA awards $3.99M contract for environmental consulting at Kennedy Space Center
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $3,988,964 ($4.0M)
Contractor: Tetra Tech, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2019-09-24
End Date: 2026-03-30
Contract Duration: 2,379 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: SERVICE AND SUPPORT FOR AIR SPARGE INTERIM MEASURE ACTIVITIES AT FORMER CENTRAL HEAT PLANTKENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLORIDA
Place of Performance
Location: ORLANDO, BREVARD County, FLORIDA, 32899
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $4.0 million to TETRA TECH, INC. for work described as: SERVICE AND SUPPORT FOR AIR SPARGE INTERIM MEASURE ACTIVITIES AT FORMER CENTRAL HEAT PLANTKENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLORIDA Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized environmental services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration extends over several years, indicating a long-term need. 4. Fixed-price contract type shifts risk to the contractor. 5. Services are critical for environmental compliance and remediation. 6. Geographic focus on Florida highlights regional environmental concerns.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $4 million for environmental consulting services over a multi-year period seems aligned with industry standards for specialized projects. Benchmarking against similar environmental remediation and consulting contracts awarded by NASA or other federal agencies would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm fixed-price structure indicates that the contractor bears the financial risk for cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified, but this procurement method typically fosters a competitive environment, leading to potentially better pricing and service offerings for the government. The agency's commitment to open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging multiple companies to bid, which can drive down costs and improve the quality of services received.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is NASA, ensuring environmental compliance and support for operations at Kennedy Space Center. Services include environmental consulting and support for air sparge interim measure activities. The geographic impact is concentrated at Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The contract supports specialized environmental consulting roles, potentially impacting the local environmental services workforce.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if interim measures require extensive, unforeseen remediation.
- Dependence on contractor expertise for critical environmental compliance.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract limits government's financial exposure to cost overruns.
- Long contract duration allows for sustained environmental management and oversight.
- Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
Sector Analysis
The environmental consulting services sector is a significant market supporting government agencies and private industry. This contract falls within the broader environmental services industry, which includes areas like remediation, compliance, and engineering. Spending in this sector is often driven by regulatory requirements and the need for specialized expertise in managing environmental impacts. Comparable contracts would involve similar environmental support services for large federal installations.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside requirement. The prime contractor, TETRA TECH, INC., is a large business, and their subcontracting plans, if any, would be at their discretion or as negotiated.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program officials within NASA's Kennedy Space Center. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements. The Inspector General's office may conduct audits or investigations if specific concerns arise.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Environmental Consulting
- Base Operations Support
- Federal Facility Cleanup Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen environmental conditions are encountered.
- Dependence on contractor expertise for critical environmental compliance.
Tags
nasa, environmental-consulting, florida, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, nasa-ksc, environmental-remediation, air-sparge, interim-measure
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $4.0 million to TETRA TECH, INC.. SERVICE AND SUPPORT FOR AIR SPARGE INTERIM MEASURE ACTIVITIES AT FORMER CENTRAL HEAT PLANTKENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLORIDA
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TETRA TECH, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $4.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-09-24. End: 2026-03-30.
What is the track record of TETRA TECH, INC. with NASA for similar environmental services?
TETRA TECH, INC. has a significant history of contracting with federal agencies, including NASA, for environmental and engineering services. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, particularly those involving environmental consulting and remediation at space centers or other large federal facilities, would reveal their reliability, quality of work, and adherence to schedules and budgets. Past performance reviews and any documented disputes or awards associated with their previous NASA contracts would provide crucial context for assessing their suitability for this current award. A review of contract databases like FPDS or SAM.gov could yield specific details on their prior engagements and performance ratings.
How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated cost or initial solicitations?
Without access to the original solicitation documents or internal cost estimates, it is challenging to definitively compare the awarded amount of $3.99 million to initial projections. However, the fact that it was awarded under full and open competition suggests that the final price reflects market conditions and the bids received from multiple offerors. If the awarded amount is significantly lower than anticipated, it could indicate strong competition or effective negotiation. Conversely, if it aligns closely with or exceeds initial estimates, it might warrant further investigation into the scope or market pricing. Publicly available contract award data often provides the final negotiated price, but not necessarily the initial government estimate.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and deliverables for this contract?
The contract specifies 'SERVICE AND SUPPORT FOR AIR SPARGE INTERIM MEASURE ACTIVITIES'. Key performance indicators would likely revolve around the successful implementation and monitoring of these air sparge activities, ensuring they meet environmental standards and regulatory requirements. Deliverables would probably include detailed reports on system performance, environmental monitoring data, compliance documentation, and recommendations for further action. The contract's success would be measured by the contractor's ability to effectively manage and execute these interim measures, contributing to the overall environmental cleanup and compliance goals at Kennedy Space Center within the agreed-upon timeframe and budget.
What is the historical spending trend for environmental consulting services at Kennedy Space Center?
Analyzing historical spending trends for environmental consulting services at Kennedy Space Center (KSC) would provide valuable context for the $3.99 million award. This involves examining past contract awards for similar services over several fiscal years. Significant fluctuations or a consistent upward trend in spending could indicate changing environmental needs, increased regulatory scrutiny, or shifts in agency priorities. Understanding this historical pattern helps in assessing whether the current contract represents a typical investment, an increase due to specific project demands, or a potential area for cost-saving analysis. Data from sources like USASpending.gov can be used to track this historical expenditure.
Are there any specific environmental risks or challenges associated with the former Central Heat Plant site?
The designation 'FORMER CENTRAL HEAT PLANT' suggests potential environmental risks associated with historical industrial operations. Such sites often carry risks of soil and groundwater contamination from fuels, lubricants, or byproducts of combustion and heating processes. Air sparge interim measures are typically employed to address volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or other contaminants in groundwater. The specific risks would depend on the types of fuels used, operational history, and any previous site assessments. Understanding these underlying risks is crucial for evaluating the scope and necessity of the environmental consulting services being procured.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 661 ANDERSEN DR STE 11, PITTSBURGH, PA, 15220
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $3,988,964
Exercised Options: $3,988,964
Current Obligation: $3,988,964
Actual Outlays: $3,497,585
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80KSC019D0011
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-09-24
Current End Date: 2026-03-30
Potential End Date: 2026-03-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-03
More Contracts from Tetra Tech, Inc.
- Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement HAS a Humanitarian Demining Request for International Assistance to Ukraine/Conventional Weapons Destruction (CWD) — $218.6M (Department of State)
- Under This Task Order the Contractor Provides ALL Services, Equipment, and Supplies to Neutralize Unexploded and Abandoned Ordnance and Ieds Throughout Iraq — $138.3M (Department of State)
- Usaid Overseas Contract — $123.9M (Agency for International Development)
- Shared Early Warning Systems 3 (sews 3) — $66.9M (Department of Defense)
- Overseas Contract — $59.7M (Department of State)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →