NASA Awards $3.06M for Hypergolic Maintenance Facility Interim Measures at KSC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $3,062,900 ($3.1M)
Contractor: Tetra Tech, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2019-08-16
End Date: 2026-03-30
Contract Duration: 2,418 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: INTERIM MEASURE ACTIVITIES AT HYPERGOL MAINTENANCE FACILITY NORTH, KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLORIDA
Place of Performance
Location: ORLANDO, BREVARD County, FLORIDA, 32899
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $3.1 million to TETRA TECH, INC. for work described as: INTERIM MEASURE ACTIVITIES AT HYPERGOL MAINTENANCE FACILITY NORTH, KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLORIDA Key points: 1. Contract awarded to TETRA TECH, INC. for environmental consulting services. 2. Significant duration of 2418 days suggests a long-term need for these services. 3. The contract value is moderate, but the extended period warrants scrutiny. 4. Focus on environmental consulting aligns with NASA's operational needs at KSC.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $3.06M over approximately 6.6 years results in an average annual spend of roughly $464k. Without specific benchmarks for similar environmental consulting services at space facilities, it's difficult to definitively assess pricing, but the duration suggests a need for careful cost management.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method is generally expected to yield fair pricing, but the long duration and specific nature of the services may limit the pool of qualified bidders.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for environmental consulting services essential for NASA's operations, with the expectation of competitive pricing due to the award method.
Public Impact
Ensures environmental compliance and safety at a critical NASA facility. Supports ongoing operations at Kennedy Space Center. Potential for long-term environmental stewardship and remediation activities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (over 6 years) may lead to cost overruns if not managed effectively.
- Lack of specific performance metrics or milestones in the provided data.
- Potential for scope creep over the extended period.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
- Addresses critical environmental needs at a major federal facility.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty.
Sector Analysis
Environmental consulting services are crucial for federal agencies managing complex facilities like NASA's Kennedy Space Center. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on the scope of environmental assessments, remediation, and compliance activities required.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses had opportunities to participate as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The long duration of this contract necessitates robust oversight from NASA to ensure performance standards are met and costs remain within budget. Regular reviews and performance evaluations will be key to accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Consulting Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Extended contract duration increases risk of cost escalation and scope creep.
- Lack of specific detail on the nature of 'Interim Measure Activities'.
- No indication of small business participation.
- Potential for vendor lock-in due to specialized services and long duration.
Tags
environmental-consulting-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, fl, delivery-order, 1m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $3.1 million to TETRA TECH, INC.. INTERIM MEASURE ACTIVITIES AT HYPERGOL MAINTENANCE FACILITY NORTH, KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLORIDA
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TETRA TECH, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $3.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-08-16. End: 2026-03-30.
What specific environmental services are included under 'Interim Measure Activities' and how do they contribute to the long-term operational goals of the Hypergolic Maintenance Facility?
The term 'Interim Measure Activities' typically refers to actions taken to address immediate environmental concerns while a more permanent solution is developed. For the Hypergolic Maintenance Facility, this could involve containment, monitoring, or preliminary cleanup of hazardous materials related to hypergolic propellants. These activities are crucial for ensuring regulatory compliance, protecting personnel and the environment, and enabling the facility's continued, safe operation during the planning or implementation phases of long-term remediation or upgrades.
Given the firm fixed price contract type, what mechanisms are in place to manage potential cost increases or scope creep over the 2418-day performance period?
While a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract provides cost certainty, managing scope creep over a long duration like 2418 days requires diligent contract administration. NASA likely employs change order processes that require formal justification and approval for any modifications to the original scope. Regular performance reviews, clear communication channels with TETRA TECH, and strict adherence to the contract's defined deliverables are essential to prevent unauthorized expansion of work and control costs.
How does the $3.06M award compare to typical spending for similar environmental consulting services at other aerospace or large industrial facilities?
Benchmarking this $3.06M award against similar contracts is challenging without access to a comprehensive database of environmental consulting services for aerospace facilities. Factors like the specific environmental hazards present, the regulatory landscape, and the geographic location significantly influence costs. However, considering the 6.6-year duration, the average annual spend of approximately $464k appears moderate, suggesting it might be in line with specialized, long-term environmental management needs at a federal site.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 661 ANDERSEN DR STE 11, PITTSBURGH, PA, 15220
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $3,062,900
Exercised Options: $3,062,900
Current Obligation: $3,062,900
Actual Outlays: $1,207,427
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80KSC019D0011
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-08-16
Current End Date: 2026-03-30
Potential End Date: 2026-03-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-20
More Contracts from Tetra Tech, Inc.
- Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement HAS a Humanitarian Demining Request for International Assistance to Ukraine/Conventional Weapons Destruction (CWD) — $218.6M (Department of State)
- Under This Task Order the Contractor Provides ALL Services, Equipment, and Supplies to Neutralize Unexploded and Abandoned Ordnance and Ieds Throughout Iraq — $138.3M (Department of State)
- Usaid Overseas Contract — $123.9M (Agency for International Development)
- Shared Early Warning Systems 3 (sews 3) — $66.9M (Department of Defense)
- Overseas Contract — $59.7M (Department of State)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →