NASA Awards $12.8M Security Services Contract to Chenega Global Protection for 364 Days
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,784,973 ($12.8M)
Contractor: Chenega Global Protection, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2025-10-01
End Date: 2026-09-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $35.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: SECURITY SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: HOUSTON, HARRIS County, TEXAS, 77058
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $12.8 million to CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC for work described as: SECURITY SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract Value: $12.8 million for security guard and patrol services. 2. Competition: Full and open competition after exclusion of sources. 3. Risk: Potential for higher costs due to exclusion of sources. 4. Sector: Information Technology (NAICS 561612).
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $12.8 million for 364 days suggests a daily rate of approximately $35,124. This rate needs to be benchmarked against similar security contracts to assess its fairness.
Cost Per Unit: $35,124 per day
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources. While this indicates competition, the exclusion of specific sources might limit the full competitive landscape and potentially impact price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive process aims to secure value for taxpayers, but the exclusion of sources warrants scrutiny to ensure the best possible pricing was achieved.
Public Impact
Ensures security for NASA operations, protecting personnel and assets. Supports a private company, Chenega Global Protection, LLC, through government contracting. The contract duration of one year provides stable security services. The specific exclusion of sources in the competition method could be a point of public interest.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Exclusion of sources in competition
- Potential for uncompetitive pricing
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized
- Clear contract duration and value
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically security and investigation services. Benchmarks for similar security guard and patrol services contracts are crucial for evaluating cost-effectiveness.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved in this specific award. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight will be crucial to ensure Chenega Global Protection, LLC meets all contractual obligations and performance standards. NASA's contracting officers will monitor adherence to the terms and conditions.
Related Government Programs
- Security Guards and Patrol Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for inflated costs due to source exclusion.
- Lack of transparency regarding specific excluded sources.
- High daily rate requires strong justification and benchmarking.
- Need for clear performance metrics to ensure value.
Tags
security-guards-and-patrol-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, tx, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $12.8 million to CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC. SECURITY SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.
What is the justification for excluding specific sources in the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method?
The justification for excluding specific sources, even within a full and open competition framework, typically relates to specialized capabilities, past performance issues with certain vendors, or specific security clearances required for the contract. Understanding this rationale is key to assessing whether the exclusion was necessary and ultimately beneficial for securing the required services at a fair price.
How does the daily rate of $35,124 compare to industry benchmarks for similar security services?
A daily rate of $35,124 for security services is substantial and requires rigorous benchmarking against industry standards for comparable contracts. Factors such as the number of personnel, their skill levels, hours of coverage, and the specific security environment at NASA facilities will influence this rate. Without comparative data, it's difficult to definitively assess if this represents good value or a potential overpayment.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract and how will they be measured?
Key performance indicators for security services typically include response times, incident reporting accuracy, personnel attentiveness, and adherence to post orders. NASA will likely have specific KPIs outlined in the contract. Effective measurement and reporting of these KPIs are essential for ensuring the contractor is meeting expectations and for justifying the expenditure of taxpayer funds.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 14420 ALBEMARLE POINT PL STE 100, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $12,784,973
Exercised Options: $12,784,973
Current Obligation: $12,784,973
Actual Outlays: $3,555,132
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80KSC022DA001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-10-01
Current End Date: 2026-09-30
Potential End Date: 2026-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-16
More Contracts from Chenega Global Protection, LLC
- Armed Security Guards for Atlanta&ft. Collins — $110.1M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- ATL FT Collins Guards Bridge — $33.3M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Base Award for Security and Access Control Services in Support of Usag-Ka — $26.3M (Department of Defense)
- Services — $23.9M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Nasa Protective Services Contract - South Region (npsc-Sr) KSC Task Order for Baseline and Pre-Priced Items — $16.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →