NASA awards $46.1M letter contract to Dynetics for laser air monitoring systems
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $46,130,740 ($46.1M)
Contractor: Dynetics, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2021-02-04
End Date: 2025-12-31
Contract Duration: 1,791 days
Daily Burn Rate: $25.8K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: LETTER CONTRACT FOR LASER AIR MONITORING SYSTEM
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35806
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $46.1 million to DYNETICS, INC. for work described as: LETTER CONTRACT FOR LASER AIR MONITORING SYSTEM Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, limiting price competition. 2. The contract is for a laser air monitoring system, a specialized technology. 3. Performance period extends over 4 years, indicating a long-term need. 4. The contract is a definitive contract, suggesting a firm commitment. 5. The contract is firm fixed price, providing cost certainty for the government. 6. The contractor, Dynetics, Inc., is based in Alabama.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $46.1 million for a laser air monitoring system is difficult to benchmark without specific technical details and comparable systems. As a letter contract, it signifies an initial commitment, and the final value could change. The firm fixed price structure offers some cost control, but the lack of competition raises concerns about achieving the best possible value. Further analysis would require understanding the system's capabilities and market alternatives.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed. This typically occurs when only one responsible source is available or when there is a compelling justification for not seeking competition. The lack of competition means that NASA did not receive multiple proposals, which could have led to a lower price through competitive bidding.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not have received the most competitive pricing due to the absence of a bidding process. The government's ability to negotiate the best possible price is diminished without alternative offers.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is NASA, which will receive a laser air monitoring system. The system is intended for use in space vehicle parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing. The geographic impact is primarily within Alabama, where Dynetics, Inc. is located. The contract supports specialized manufacturing and technology development within the aerospace sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.
- Sole-source award limits transparency in pricing and selection.
- The specific capabilities and necessity of the laser air monitoring system require further justification.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Long-term performance period suggests a critical and sustained need.
- Award to a single contractor can expedite delivery of specialized technology.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the 'Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector. This is a highly specialized area within the broader aerospace industry, often characterized by complex technologies and a limited number of qualified contractors. Spending in this sector is driven by government research, development, and procurement needs for space exploration and defense.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, this award is unlikely to have a direct positive impact on the small business ecosystem. The focus appears to be on a specialized capability likely requiring a larger, established prime contractor.
Oversight & Accountability
As a definitive contract, it is subject to standard government oversight mechanisms. However, the sole-source nature of the award means that oversight will focus more on performance, quality, and adherence to the contract terms rather than the competitive process itself. Transparency is limited due to the lack of a competitive solicitation process. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud or mismanagement is suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Space Vehicle Manufacturing
- Aerospace Technology Procurement
- Advanced Monitoring Systems
- NASA Research and Development Contracts
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competition
- Potential for cost overruns
- Limited transparency in pricing
Tags
nasa, space-exploration, aerospace, manufacturing, laser-monitoring, sole-source, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, alabama, dynetics-inc, advanced-technology, parts-and-auxiliary-equipment
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $46.1 million to DYNETICS, INC.. LETTER CONTRACT FOR LASER AIR MONITORING SYSTEM
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DYNETICS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $46.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2021-02-04. End: 2025-12-31.
What is the specific function and technical capability of the laser air monitoring system being procured?
The provided data indicates the contract is for a 'LETTER CONTRACT FOR LASER AIR MONITORING SYSTEM' under NAICS code 'Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing'. While the exact technical specifications are not detailed, a laser air monitoring system typically uses laser technology to detect and measure airborne particles or gases. This could be for environmental monitoring, safety systems within spacecraft or launch facilities, or for quality control in manufacturing processes related to space vehicles. The system's specific application within NASA's operations would determine its precise function, such as detecting hazardous materials, monitoring atmospheric conditions, or ensuring the cleanliness of sensitive manufacturing environments.
How does the $46.1 million contract value compare to similar procurements for laser air monitoring systems?
Benchmarking the $46.1 million contract value for a laser air monitoring system is challenging without more specific details on the system's capabilities, intended use, and the number of units or scope of service. Laser air monitoring systems can vary significantly in complexity and cost, from portable detectors to large-scale industrial installations. Given this is a sole-source definitive contract with a firm fixed price, and awarded by NASA for space vehicle-related manufacturing, it suggests a highly specialized and potentially advanced system. Without access to a database of comparable sole-source procurements for similar specialized laser monitoring technology within the aerospace sector, a direct value comparison is difficult. However, the extended performance period (over 4 years) indicates a substantial and long-term requirement.
What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source award for this type of technology?
The primary risk associated with a sole-source award for this laser air monitoring system is the potential for inflated costs due to the lack of competitive pressure. Without competing bids, the contractor may not have the same incentive to offer the lowest possible price. Another risk is a potential limitation in innovation or technological advancement, as there is no external market pressure to improve the system beyond the contracted scope. Furthermore, the government's leverage in negotiating terms and conditions is reduced. Ensuring the contractor's performance meets all requirements and that the price is fair and reasonable becomes paramount, requiring robust government oversight and cost analysis.
What is Dynetics, Inc.'s track record with NASA and in providing similar monitoring systems?
Dynetics, Inc. is a known defense contractor that has historically worked with NASA and other government agencies on various advanced technology projects. While specific details on their past performance related to laser air monitoring systems are not provided in the summary data, their involvement in 'Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' suggests relevant experience. A thorough assessment of Dynetics' track record would involve reviewing their past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), previous contracts with NASA, and their demonstrated capabilities in developing and delivering complex technological solutions. Their ability to secure this sole-source contract implies a level of trust and perceived capability by NASA.
How does this contract align with NASA's broader strategic goals in space exploration and manufacturing?
This contract for a laser air monitoring system likely aligns with NASA's strategic goals by supporting the safety, quality, and efficiency of its space exploration and manufacturing initiatives. Advanced monitoring systems are crucial for ensuring the integrity of spacecraft components, maintaining cleanroom environments for sensitive manufacturing, and potentially for in-situ environmental monitoring during space missions or ground operations. By procuring such a system, NASA demonstrates its commitment to leveraging cutting-edge technology to enhance operational reliability, reduce risks, and maintain high standards in the production and maintenance of space-bound hardware. The investment supports the broader objective of advancing space technology and capabilities.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: 80JSC020R0022P00003
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1002 EXPLORER BLVD, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35806
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $90,000,000
Exercised Options: $46,130,740
Current Obligation: $46,130,740
Actual Outlays: $33,902,211
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 39
Total Subaward Amount: $4,622,000
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2021-02-04
Current End Date: 2025-12-31
Potential End Date: 2025-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-18
More Contracts from Dynetics, Inc.
- FY25 BUY — $356.7M (Department of Defense)
- Work Required for the Design, Development, Manufacture, Test, Launch, Demonstration and Engineering Support of the Human Landing System Integrated Lander — $239.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- UCO - Guam Defense Systems — $204.0M (Department of Defense)
- Task Order for High Energy Laser Tactical Vehicle Demonstrator - the Usasmdc/Arstrat IS the HEL Developer for the Army and This Requirement Will Serve AS an Enabler for a Potential Technology Transition to the Program Executive Office Missiles and Space for the Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2-Intercept Program of Record. Igf::ot::igf — $202.7M (Department of Defense)
- Chgb TPS NTE Award — $195.5M (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →