NASA's $75.5M CROM contract to Mainthia Technologies Inc. for facilities support services awarded under full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $75,453,604 ($75.5M)
Contractor: Mainthia Technologies Inc
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2017-10-04
End Date: 2023-09-30
Contract Duration: 2,187 days
Daily Burn Rate: $34.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: CENTRAL PROCESS, RE-CERTIFICATION, OPERATIONS, AND MAINTENANCE (CROM)
Place of Performance
Location: CLEVELAND, CUYAHOGA County, OHIO, 44135
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $75.5 million to MAINTHIA TECHNOLOGIES INC for work described as: CENTRAL PROCESS, RE-CERTIFICATION, OPERATIONS, AND MAINTENANCE (CROM) Key points: 1. The contract's value of $75.5 million over its duration suggests a significant investment in maintaining critical NASA facilities. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, this contract likely benefited from a competitive bidding process to ensure fair pricing. 3. The 'Facilities Support Services' category indicates a broad scope of work, potentially encompassing maintenance, repair, and operational support. 4. The contract's duration of approximately 6 years (2187 days) allows for long-term planning and consistent service delivery. 5. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type suggests that while costs are reimbursed, a fixed fee is paid to the contractor, balancing risk and incentive. 6. The presence of 3 bids indicates a moderate level of competition for this service contract.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's value of $75.5 million over nearly six years for facilities support services appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities support contracts for federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The CPFF structure, while common, requires careful oversight to manage costs effectively and ensure the fixed fee remains appropriate for the services rendered.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that the solicitation was broadly advertised, and multiple responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The fact that three bids were received suggests a moderate level of competition. While more than three bidders would typically indicate stronger price discovery, three offers still provide a basis for comparison and negotiation.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive process, even with three bidders, generally leads to better pricing for taxpayers compared to sole-source or limited competition awards. This ensures that the government receives services at a more market-aligned cost.
Public Impact
NASA facilities across Ohio benefit from essential operations, maintenance, and re-certification services, ensuring their continued functionality. The contract supports the operational readiness of critical infrastructure necessary for NASA's research, development, and space exploration missions. The workforce in Ohio may see employment opportunities and stability through the execution of this facilities support contract. The services delivered are crucial for maintaining a safe and efficient working environment for NASA personnel.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns inherent in Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts if not rigorously managed.
- Ensuring the fixed fee remains competitive and reflective of market rates over the contract's lifespan.
- The scope of 'Facilities Support Services' can be broad; clear performance metrics are essential to avoid scope creep or service gaps.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust and fair bidding process.
- The contract's significant duration allows for stable service provision and potential for long-term efficiency gains.
- The fixed fee component provides a degree of cost certainty for the government, assuming effective oversight.
Sector Analysis
The Facilities Support Services sector is a critical component of government operations, encompassing a wide range of activities from routine maintenance to specialized technical support for complex infrastructure. This contract falls within a broad category of services that agencies rely on to maintain their physical assets. Spending in this sector is often substantial due to the extensive real estate and equipment federal agencies manage. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large federal contracts for similar facility management and maintenance services across various agencies.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, Mainthia Technologies Inc., is likely a larger entity. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this data. The absence of a small business set-aside means that opportunities for small businesses would primarily arise through subcontracting, if Mainthia Technologies Inc. chooses to engage them.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards, reporting requirements, and potential penalties for non-compliance. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Operations and Support Contracts
- Federal Facilities Maintenance Services
- Government-wide Facilities Support Contracts
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee Service Contracts
Risk Flags
- Cost Overrun Risk (CPFF)
- Scope Creep Potential
- Performance Monitoring Challenges
Tags
facilities-support-services, nasa, national-aeronautics-and-space-administration, ohio, definitive-contract, full-and-open-competition, cost-plus-fixed-fee, large-contract, service-contract, operations-maintenance
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $75.5 million to MAINTHIA TECHNOLOGIES INC. CENTRAL PROCESS, RE-CERTIFICATION, OPERATIONS, AND MAINTENANCE (CROM)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MAINTHIA TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $75.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-10-04. End: 2023-09-30.
What is the historical spending trend for facilities support services at NASA?
Analyzing historical spending trends for facilities support services at NASA requires access to detailed historical contract data beyond this single award. Generally, federal agencies like NASA experience consistent or increasing spending in facilities support due to aging infrastructure, evolving operational requirements, and the need for specialized maintenance. Factors such as budget allocations, agency priorities, and the number and scale of facilities managed directly influence these spending patterns. Without specific historical data for NASA's facilities support, it's difficult to provide precise figures, but it is a perennial and significant expenditure category for large federal organizations.
How does Mainthia Technologies Inc.'s performance on this contract compare to industry benchmarks?
Assessing Mainthia Technologies Inc.'s performance on this specific contract requires access to performance evaluations, quality assurance reviews, and potentially customer satisfaction data, which are not provided in the basic award details. Industry benchmarks for facilities support services typically focus on metrics such as response times for maintenance requests, uptime of critical systems, cost-efficiency in resource utilization, safety incident rates, and adherence to service level agreements (SLAs). To compare, one would need to review NASA's internal performance reports for this contract and contrast them with established industry standards for similar services, considering the unique operational environment of NASA facilities.
What are the key risks associated with the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type for this service?
The primary risk with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract is the potential for cost overruns. While the contractor is incentivized to control costs to protect their fixed fee, the government bears the risk of reimbursing all allowable costs. If the contractor's cost estimates are inaccurate or if unforeseen issues arise, the total cost to the government can exceed initial projections. Effective oversight, detailed cost accounting, and clear definition of allowable costs are crucial to mitigate this risk. The fixed fee itself needs to be carefully negotiated to ensure it adequately compensates the contractor for their effort and risk without being excessive.
What is the typical duration and value range for similar federal facilities support contracts?
Federal facilities support contracts can vary significantly in duration and value depending on the scope, scale, and complexity of the facilities managed. Typical durations often range from 3 to 10 years, including option periods, to allow for stable service delivery and contractor investment. Values can range from a few million dollars for smaller installations to hundreds of millions or even billions for large, multi-site, or highly specialized facilities. This NASA contract, valued at approximately $75.5 million over nearly six years, appears to be within the mid-to-large range for a single agency's significant facility support requirement.
How does the 'Facilities Support Services' NAICS code (561210) define the scope of work?
The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210, 'Facilities Support Services,' encompasses establishments primarily engaged in providing operating engineers or facility support services. This includes the management and operation of facilities, such as office buildings, and providing a range of support services, including cleaning, security, refuse collection, and maintenance. It is a broad category that can cover everything from janitorial services to the operation of building systems like HVAC, electrical, and plumbing. The specific services under this contract would be detailed in the Statement of Work (SOW).
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: NNC15ZFD007R
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 7055 ENGLE RD STE 502, CLEVELAND, OH, 44130
Business Categories: Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $76,759,667
Exercised Options: $76,641,429
Current Obligation: $75,453,604
Actual Outlays: $55,930,910
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED
Timeline
Start Date: 2017-10-04
Current End Date: 2023-09-30
Potential End Date: 2023-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-10
More Contracts from Mainthia Technologies Inc
- On-Site Support Services for Operations, Maintenance and Engineering of Central Process Systems and — $40.1M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →