NASA awards $10.4M for protective services, focusing on program management and technical support at Ames
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,373,755 ($10.4M)
Contractor: Chenega Global Protection, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2025-10-01
End Date: 2026-09-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $28.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: NASA PROTECTIVE SERVICES CONTRACT AMES TASK ORDER (PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL SERVICES)
Place of Performance
Location: MOFFETT FIELD, SANTA CLARA County, CALIFORNIA, 94035
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $10.4 million to CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC for work described as: NASA PROTECTIVE SERVICES CONTRACT AMES TASK ORDER (PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL SERVICES) Key points: 1. Contract value of $10.4M over approximately one year suggests a significant investment in security and technical expertise. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a broad market search for qualified vendors. 3. Fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the agency. 4. The specific NAICS code (561612) points to a focus on security guard and patrol services, with an added layer of program management and technical support. 5. The award to Chenega Global Protection, LLC, warrants a review of their past performance in similar complex service contracts. 6. Geographic concentration in California may indicate specific security needs at the Ames Research Center.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $10.4M for a 364-day period, encompassing program management and technical services, appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the work. Benchmarking against similar NASA protective services contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure is a positive indicator for cost control.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' which is a less common but still competitive method. This suggests that while the initial pool might have been narrowed, the final award was still subject to a competitive process. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation implies a robust effort to solicit offers from qualified contractors.
Taxpayer Impact: This competitive approach aims to ensure taxpayers receive the best value by allowing multiple capable firms to bid, driving down prices and improving service quality.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are NASA's Ames Research Center, which will receive enhanced security and technical support. Services delivered include program management and technical services, crucial for the smooth operation and security of the facility. The geographic impact is localized to Moffett Field, California, where the Ames Research Center is located. Workforce implications may include the direct employment of security personnel and program managers by the contractor, Chenega Global Protection, LLC.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for over-reliance on a single contractor for critical security functions.
- Need for robust performance monitoring to ensure service quality meets NASA's standards.
- The 'exclusion of sources' aspect of the competition warrants further understanding to ensure no qualified vendors were unduly excluded.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive marketplace was leveraged.
- Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- Contract duration of approximately one year allows for flexibility and reassessment of needs.
Sector Analysis
The security and protective services sector is a significant component of government contracting, encompassing a wide range of services from physical security to specialized technical support. This contract falls within the broader category of professional, scientific, and technical services, specifically targeting security operations. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous firms capable of meeting government requirements. NASA's spending in this area is critical for safeguarding its research facilities and personnel.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside consideration for this specific contract. This suggests the contract was likely awarded to a larger prime contractor, and any subcontracting opportunities for small businesses would depend on Chenega Global Protection, LLC's internal policies and the specific requirements of the task order. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be needed to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by NASA's contracting officers and program managers at the Ames Research Center. Performance will be monitored against the terms and conditions of the firm fixed-price delivery order. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. The Inspector General's office may conduct audits or investigations if specific concerns regarding waste, fraud, or abuse arise.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Protective Services Contracts
- NASA Ames Research Center Operations
- Federal Security Guard Services
- Program Management Support Services
- Technical Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep in technical services.
- Dependence on contractor performance for critical facility security.
- Need for clear performance metrics for program management and technical support.
Tags
nasa, protective-services, program-management, technical-services, security-guards, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, california, chenega-global-protection, large-contract, professional-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $10.4 million to CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC. NASA PROTECTIVE SERVICES CONTRACT AMES TASK ORDER (PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL SERVICES)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.
What is the track record of Chenega Global Protection, LLC with NASA and other federal agencies for similar protective services contracts?
Chenega Global Protection, LLC has a substantial history of federal contracting, particularly within the security and protective services domain. A review of federal procurement data indicates numerous awards to Chenega and its subsidiaries across various agencies, including the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, and other civilian agencies. Their portfolio often includes guard services, physical security, and sometimes more specialized technical support. To assess their suitability for this specific NASA contract, it would be crucial to examine their performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) on similar-sized and scope contracts, particularly those involving program management and technical services, to identify any patterns of excellence or areas of concern.
How does the per-unit cost or overall value of this contract compare to similar protective services contracts awarded by NASA or other agencies?
Direct per-unit cost comparison is challenging without detailed service breakdowns (e.g., cost per guard hour, cost per technical support hour). However, the total contract value of approximately $10.4 million for a 364-day period, covering program management and technical services alongside protective duties, suggests a significant investment. Benchmarking against other NASA contracts for similar facilities or other agencies' contracts for comparable research centers would be necessary. Factors like geographic location (California often has higher labor costs), the specific technical requirements, and the level of security clearance needed will influence pricing. A preliminary assessment suggests the value is within a reasonable range for specialized services at a major research facility, but a detailed comparative analysis is recommended.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and risk mitigation strategies outlined in this contract?
While the specific KPIs and risk mitigation strategies are not detailed in the provided summary data, firm fixed-price contracts generally place the onus on the contractor to manage risks and meet performance standards. For a protective services contract involving program management and technical support, KPIs would likely include response times to incidents, security patrol effectiveness, accuracy of technical reporting, adherence to schedules, and overall client satisfaction. Risk mitigation strategies would typically involve robust security protocols, contingency planning for service disruptions, background checks for personnel, and regular performance reviews. NASA's contract administration team would be responsible for monitoring adherence to these measures.
What is the historical spending pattern for protective services at NASA's Ames Research Center?
Analyzing historical spending patterns for protective services at NASA's Ames Research Center is essential for understanding the context of this $10.4 million award. This requires accessing historical contract data for Ames, looking specifically at contracts with NAICS codes related to security services (like 561612) and potentially program management or technical support. Trends in contract values, durations, incumbent contractors, and competition levels over the past 5-10 years would reveal whether this award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of spending. Understanding if previous contracts were sole-source or competed, and the performance of prior incumbents, provides valuable insight into the agency's needs and the market's responsiveness.
What specific technical services are included under this contract beyond standard security guard duties?
The contract explicitly mentions 'Program Management and Technical Services' in addition to protective services. This suggests a scope beyond traditional security guard and patrol functions. Technical services could encompass a range of activities supporting the Ames Research Center's operations, such as IT support for security systems, specialized monitoring, data analysis related to security events, technical consulting on security infrastructure, or support for research-specific security protocols. Program management implies oversight, planning, and coordination of these services. The exact nature of these technical services would be detailed in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and is critical for understanding the full value and complexity of the contract.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 14420 ALBEMARLE POINT PL STE 100, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $10,690,363
Exercised Options: $10,690,363
Current Obligation: $10,373,755
Actual Outlays: $2,672,591
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80KSC022DA001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-10-01
Current End Date: 2026-09-30
Potential End Date: 2026-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-25
More Contracts from Chenega Global Protection, LLC
- Armed Security Guards for Atlanta&ft. Collins — $110.1M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- ATL FT Collins Guards Bridge — $33.3M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Base Award for Security and Access Control Services in Support of Usag-Ka — $26.3M (Department of Defense)
- Services — $23.9M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Nasa Protective Services Contract - South Region (npsc-Sr) KSC Task Order for Baseline and Pre-Priced Items — $16.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →