NASA awards $4.67M contract for protective services in California, highlighting security needs
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $4,671,696 ($4.7M)
Contractor: Chenega Global Protection, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2024-03-01
End Date: 2025-02-28
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $12.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: AFRC PROTECTIVE SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: EDWARDS, KERN County, CALIFORNIA, 93523
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $4.7 million to CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC for work described as: AFRC PROTECTIVE SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in safeguarding NASA facilities. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding process for security services. 3. Performance period of one year indicates a need for ongoing, consistent security operations. 4. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide budget certainty. 5. Geographic focus on California points to specific operational requirements in that region. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561612 categorizes the service as Security Guards and Patrol Services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $4.67 million for one year of security services appears reasonable given the nature of protective services for a federal agency like NASA. Benchmarking against similar contracts for security guards and patrol services across federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests an effort to establish clear cost expectations. Without specific per-unit cost data or comparison to market rates for similar services in California, a definitive assessment of pricing efficiency is limited.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while the competition was broad, there were specific reasons for excluding certain sources, possibly related to prior performance or specific security clearances required. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation generally implies a robust competitive process. This level of competition is expected to drive price discovery and ensure fair market value.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition, even with exclusions, is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages multiple vendors to bid, potentially leading to lower prices and better service quality.
Public Impact
NASA facilities and personnel in California are the primary beneficiaries, ensuring a secure operational environment. The contract delivers essential security guard and patrol services, crucial for maintaining safety and order. The geographic impact is concentrated in California, where NASA facilities requiring these services are located. The contract supports jobs within the private security sector, contributing to the local workforce in California.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for increased costs if excluded sources were highly competitive.
- Ensuring consistent service quality across all shifts and locations within the contract scope.
- Managing the transition between contract periods to avoid security gaps.
Positive Signals
- Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the agency.
- Full and open competition generally leads to better value.
- Clear service delivery period (one year) allows for focused performance management.
Sector Analysis
The security services sector is a significant component of the federal contracting landscape, with agencies consistently requiring protective services to safeguard assets and personnel. This contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services category, specifically focusing on security and investigation services. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous established providers capable of meeting federal requirements. NASA's spending in this area is part of a larger federal trend to ensure robust security measures across all its installations.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (sb: false) and the contractor, Chenega Global Protection, LLC, is a large business. This suggests that small businesses may not have been the primary focus for this specific procurement. However, large prime contractors are often required to subcontract a portion of their work to small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses within this contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within NASA responsible for facility security. The fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by linking payment to service delivery. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Protective Service Contracts
- Department of Homeland Security Security Services
- General Services Administration Security Contracts
- Department of Defense Security Services
Risk Flags
- Potential for limited competition due to source exclusions.
- Need for robust performance monitoring to ensure service quality.
- Contract duration requires ongoing management and potential for renewal.
Tags
security-services, protective-services, nasa, california, full-and-open-competition, fixed-price, delivery-order, large-business, facility-security, guard-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $4.7 million to CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC. AFRC PROTECTIVE SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $4.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-03-01. End: 2025-02-28.
What is the track record of Chenega Global Protection, LLC with NASA and other federal agencies?
Chenega Global Protection, LLC has a substantial history of federal contracting, particularly in providing security and protective services. A review of federal procurement data would reveal their past performance ratings, the types of contracts they have held, and their success in meeting federal requirements across various agencies, including potentially NASA and the Department of Defense. Their experience with similar security guard and patrol services contracts would be a key indicator of their capability to fulfill this NASA requirement effectively. Analyzing their past performance metrics, such as on-time delivery, quality of service, and any past disputes or contract terminations, would provide a comprehensive understanding of their reliability.
How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar security services in California?
To assess the value for money, the awarded price of $4.67 million for one year of security services needs to be benchmarked against prevailing market rates for comparable security guard and patrol services in California. This would involve researching industry reports, consulting with market analysis firms, or examining publicly available data on similar federal and state contracts awarded in the region. Factors such as the number of personnel required, hours of service, specific security technologies employed, and the level of security clearance for guards would influence the market rate. A detailed comparison would determine if NASA secured competitive pricing or if there is potential for cost savings.
What are the specific risks associated with this type of security services contract?
Risks associated with this security services contract include potential disruptions to service delivery if the contractor faces staffing shortages or operational issues, leading to security vulnerabilities. There's also a risk of inconsistent service quality if performance standards are not rigorously monitored. The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' designation might indicate a complex requirement or a history with specific vendors, potentially limiting the pool of highly qualified bidders and increasing the risk of selecting a less-than-ideal contractor. Furthermore, ensuring compliance with all federal regulations and security protocols by the contractor's personnel is a continuous risk that requires diligent oversight.
How effective are NASA's current security measures, and how does this contract contribute to overall program effectiveness?
The effectiveness of NASA's security measures is directly tied to the quality and reliability of the protective services provided. This contract contributes to program effectiveness by ensuring the physical security of NASA facilities, protecting sensitive equipment, research, and personnel from unauthorized access, theft, or damage. The specific services rendered under this contract, such as patrol, access control, and surveillance, are fundamental to maintaining a secure operational environment. The agency's overall security posture is enhanced by having dedicated, professional security personnel, which in turn supports the uninterrupted execution of NASA's scientific and exploratory missions.
What has been NASA's historical spending on protective and security services in California?
Analyzing NASA's historical spending on protective and security services in California would provide context for the current $4.67 million award. This would involve reviewing past contract awards for similar services within the state over several fiscal years. Understanding trends in spending, the types of contracts awarded (e.g., fixed-price, cost-plus), the primary contractors utilized, and the average contract values can reveal patterns of investment in security. Such historical data is crucial for assessing whether the current contract represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment in security for NASA's California operations.
What are the implications of the 'After Exclusion of Sources' clause on competition and cost?
The 'After Exclusion of Sources' clause in a 'Full and Open Competition' award suggests that while the competition was broadly advertised, certain potential offerors were specifically excluded from bidding. The reasons for exclusion could range from past performance issues, inability to meet specific technical requirements, or failure to obtain necessary security clearances. While the intent is still to achieve a competitive outcome, the exclusion of certain entities might limit the overall number of viable bidders. This could potentially reduce the downward pressure on pricing compared to a truly unrestricted full and open competition, and it may indicate a higher degree of specificity in the required qualifications for the contractor.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 14420 ALBEMARLE POINT PL STE 100, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,671,696
Exercised Options: $4,671,696
Current Obligation: $4,671,696
Actual Outlays: $4,671,696
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80GSFC23DA004
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-03-01
Current End Date: 2025-02-28
Potential End Date: 2025-02-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-16
More Contracts from Chenega Global Protection, LLC
- Armed Security Guards for Atlanta&ft. Collins — $110.1M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- ATL FT Collins Guards Bridge — $33.3M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Base Award for Security and Access Control Services in Support of Usag-Ka — $26.3M (Department of Defense)
- Services — $23.9M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Nasa Protective Services Contract - South Region (npsc-Sr) KSC Task Order for Baseline and Pre-Priced Items — $16.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →