CMS awards $95.3M contract to Peraton Inc. for MEPBS application modernization and automation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $95,304,191 ($95.3M)

Contractor: Peraton Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2019-03-01

End Date: 2024-02-29

Contract Duration: 1,826 days

Daily Burn Rate: $52.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: CMS IS SEEKING TO MAINTAIN AND ALSO MODERNIZE MEPBS APPLICATIONS. IN ADDITION, CMS IS AUTOMATING MANUAL BUSINESS PROCESSES AND REPLACING BATCH FILE SUBMISSIONS AND DATA DISSEMINATION.

Place of Performance

Location: WINDSOR MILL, BALTIMORE County, MARYLAND, 21244

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $95.3 million to PERATON INC. for work described as: CMS IS SEEKING TO MAINTAIN AND ALSO MODERNIZE MEPBS APPLICATIONS. IN ADDITION, CMS IS AUTOMATING MANUAL BUSINESS PROCESSES AND REPLACING BATCH FILE SUBMISSIONS AND DATA DISSEMINATION. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on modernizing and automating critical Medicare and Medicaid Enterprise Business System (MEPBS) applications. 2. The shift from manual processes to automation aims to improve efficiency and reduce errors in data handling. 3. This contract represents a significant investment in the foundational IT infrastructure supporting major federal health programs. 4. The chosen contractor, Peraton Inc., has a substantial presence in government IT services. 5. The contract's duration of 1826 days indicates a long-term commitment to application maintenance and development. 6. Performance is structured as Cost Plus Award Fee, incentivizing contractor performance beyond basic requirements.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's value of $95.3 million over approximately five years for comprehensive IT modernization and automation services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale federal IT modernization efforts suggests this is within expected cost ranges. The Cost Plus Award Fee structure allows for flexibility and incentivizes performance, which can lead to better value if managed effectively. However, detailed cost breakdowns and comparisons to specific, comparable projects would be needed for a more precise value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This competitive process is designed to foster price discovery and ensure the government receives the best possible value. The fact that it was competed openly suggests a healthy market for these types of IT services.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down costs through market forces and encouraging innovation among bidders.

Public Impact

Beneficiaries include Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries who rely on the efficient operation of these systems for their healthcare services. The services delivered include modernization of existing applications, automation of manual processes, and improved data dissemination. The geographic impact is national, as MEPBS systems support federal health programs across the United States. Workforce implications include potential shifts in IT roles within CMS and its contractors, with a focus on modern development and automation skills.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Computer Systems Design Services sector, a critical component of the broader Information Technology industry. The federal government is a major consumer of these services, particularly for maintaining and modernizing complex legacy systems like those supporting Medicare and Medicaid. The market for such services is large and competitive, with numerous firms capable of undertaking large-scale IT modernization projects. Comparable spending benchmarks for federal IT modernization projects often run into hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, making this $95.3 million award a significant, but not exceptionally large, investment in this domain.

Small Business Impact

While this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not appear to have a specific small business set-aside, the prime contractor, Peraton Inc., may engage small businesses for subcontracting. The nature of IT modernization and application development often involves specialized skills that can be sourced from smaller, niche firms. The extent of small business participation will depend on Peraton's subcontracting plan and the specific requirements of the work packages.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) contracting officers and program managers. The Cost Plus Award Fee structure implies performance metrics and award criteria that will be monitored to determine contractor bonuses. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award notices and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it, health-it, cms, medicare, medicaid, application-modernization, automation, cost-plus-award-fee, full-and-open-competition, maryland, computer-systems-design-services, federal-health

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $95.3 million to PERATON INC.. CMS IS SEEKING TO MAINTAIN AND ALSO MODERNIZE MEPBS APPLICATIONS. IN ADDITION, CMS IS AUTOMATING MANUAL BUSINESS PROCESSES AND REPLACING BATCH FILE SUBMISSIONS AND DATA DISSEMINATION.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PERATON INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $95.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2019-03-01. End: 2024-02-29.

What is Peraton Inc.'s track record with similar large-scale federal IT modernization contracts, particularly within the healthcare sector?

Peraton Inc. has a significant history of performing IT services for the federal government, including within the Department of Defense and intelligence agencies. While specific details on their track record with large-scale IT modernization within the healthcare sector for CMS are not fully detailed in the provided data, their broader experience suggests a capability to handle complex projects. The company has been involved in various IT modernization, cybersecurity, and cloud migration efforts for government clients. A deeper dive into their past performance evaluations and contract history, especially for projects with similar scope and complexity to MEPBS, would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their suitability and past success rates in this specific domain.

How does the $95.3 million cost compare to other federal IT modernization contracts of similar scope and complexity?

The $95.3 million contract value for modernizing and automating MEPBS applications over approximately five years is within the typical range for significant federal IT modernization efforts. Large-scale projects involving core systems for agencies like CMS often require substantial investment due to the complexity, scale, and criticality of the systems. For instance, other federal agencies have awarded contracts in the hundreds of millions or even billions for similar IT overhauls. While this specific award is substantial, it is not an outlier when compared to the overall federal IT spending landscape for critical infrastructure modernization. The value proposition is further influenced by the Cost Plus Award Fee structure, which aims to optimize value through performance incentives.

What are the primary risks associated with modernizing and automating legacy systems like MEPBS, and how are they mitigated in this contract?

Primary risks in modernizing legacy systems include technical challenges in integrating new technologies with old ones, potential for data migration errors, user adoption issues, and project delays or cost overruns. For MEPBS, risks also involve ensuring continuity of critical healthcare services during the transition. This contract attempts to mitigate these risks through a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPA) structure, which incentivizes Peraton Inc. to perform efficiently and effectively. The contract's duration allows for phased implementation. CMS oversight, clear performance metrics, and potentially phased rollouts are crucial mitigation strategies. However, the inherent complexity of such systems means risks will always be present and require continuous management.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the efficiency and effectiveness of Medicare and Medicaid operations?

The expected impact is significant. By automating manual business processes and replacing batch file submissions with more direct data dissemination, this contract aims to streamline operations, reduce the potential for human error, and speed up data processing. This can lead to more accurate reporting, faster decision-making, and improved service delivery for beneficiaries. Modernizing the MEPBS applications should enhance system reliability, security, and scalability, ensuring these critical platforms can meet future demands. Ultimately, the goal is to improve the overall efficiency and effectiveness of CMS's core functions, supporting the administration of Medicare and Medicaid programs more robustly.

How has CMS's spending on IT modernization and application development evolved over the past several years, and does this contract align with those trends?

CMS has consistently invested heavily in IT modernization and application development to manage the complexities of Medicare and Medicaid. Over the past several years, there has been a clear trend towards cloud adoption, automation, and enhancing data analytics capabilities across federal agencies, including CMS. This $95.3 million contract for MEPBS modernization and automation aligns directly with these trends. It reflects CMS's strategic focus on updating its core IT infrastructure to improve efficiency, security, and service delivery, moving away from outdated legacy systems towards more agile and modern solutions. This investment is part of a broader, ongoing effort to ensure the sustainability and effectiveness of its critical health programs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: RFPMS2016SPARC

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12975 WORLDGATE DR STE 7322, HERNDON, VA, 20170

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $95,304,191

Exercised Options: $95,304,191

Current Obligation: $95,304,191

Actual Outlays: $51,350,414

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 150

Total Subaward Amount: $231,457,899

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HHSM500201600023I

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2019-03-01

Current End Date: 2024-02-29

Potential End Date: 2024-02-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2024-10-15

More Contracts from Peraton Inc.

View all Peraton Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts

View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending