HHS awards $15.9M for library resources, with Cox Subscriptions Inc. securing the firm-fixed-price contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,957,542 ($16.0M)

Contractor: COX Subscriptions, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2025-08-04

End Date: 2026-12-31

Contract Duration: 514 days

Daily Burn Rate: $31.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: LIBRARY RESOURCES TASK ORDER FFP

Place of Performance

Location: SHALLOTTE, BRUNSWICK County, NORTH CAROLINA, 28470

State: North Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $16.0 million to COX SUBSCRIPTIONS, INC. for work described as: LIBRARY RESOURCES TASK ORDER FFP Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in maintaining essential library resources for the agency. 2. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs, but requires careful monitoring of scope creep. 3. Competition was full and open, suggesting a potentially competitive pricing environment. 4. The contract duration extends over a year, indicating a need for sustained resource provision. 5. Performance will be key to ensuring the agency receives high-quality library materials and services. 6. The North Carolina location of the awardee may have implications for local economic impact.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $15.9 million for library resources appears reasonable given the duration and scope. Benchmarking against similar library service contracts is challenging without more specific details on the types of resources and services provided. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests that the government has a clear understanding of the costs involved, which can be a positive indicator of value if managed effectively. The absence of raw dollar amounts in the provided data prevents a direct comparison, but the overall investment seems aligned with supporting agency operations.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The fact that there were two bidders suggests a moderate level of competition. While more bidders could potentially drive prices lower, two offers still provide a basis for price comparison and negotiation, which is generally favorable for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition, even with two bidders, generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios.

Public Impact

Federal employees within the Department of Health and Human Services will benefit from access to updated and comprehensive library resources. The contract ensures the continued availability of essential information, research materials, and publications crucial for agency functions. The services delivered will support research, policy development, and operational needs across various FDA departments. The primary geographic impact is likely concentrated within the agency's operational centers, though remote access may extend benefits. Workforce implications include ensuring researchers and staff have the tools they need to perform their duties effectively.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The market for library resources and information services is diverse, encompassing publishers, subscription agents, and specialized information providers. This contract falls within the broader information services sector, which supports government agencies by providing access to research, data, and publications. Spending in this area is critical for agencies like the FDA, which rely heavily on scientific literature and data for regulatory review and public health initiatives. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without knowing the exact scope of 'library resources,' but agency-wide information access typically represents a significant operational cost.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss and sb fields) was not a specific set-aside for this contract. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside requirement. The primary contractor, Cox Subscriptions, Inc., is not identified as a small business in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Food and Drug Administration's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures will be tied to the terms and conditions of the firm-fixed-price delivery order, including performance standards and delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement databases where contract awards are reported. While specific Inspector General jurisdiction isn't detailed here, the HHS Office of Inspector General typically oversees agency spending for waste, fraud, and abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

health-and-human-services, food-and-drug-administration, library-resources, information-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, cox-subscriptions-inc, north-carolina, large-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $16.0 million to COX SUBSCRIPTIONS, INC.. LIBRARY RESOURCES TASK ORDER FFP

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is COX SUBSCRIPTIONS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Food and Drug Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-08-04. End: 2026-12-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for library resources by the FDA or HHS?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for library resources by the FDA or HHS is crucial for contextualizing the current $15.9 million award. Without specific historical data, it's difficult to determine if this represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment. Agencies typically allocate funds for library services annually, covering subscriptions, database access, and potentially physical materials. Fluctuations can occur due to changes in agency needs, budget allocations, or the introduction of new digital resources. A trend analysis over the past 5-10 years would reveal if this contract is part of a consistent program or a new initiative. Understanding past spending helps assess whether the current award is cost-effective and aligned with long-term resource management strategies.

How does the per-unit cost of specific resources compare to market rates?

Determining the per-unit cost of specific resources under this $15.9 million contract and comparing it to market rates is essential for value assessment. However, the provided data lacks the granularity to identify individual resource costs (e.g., cost per journal subscription, per database license). Cox Subscriptions, Inc. likely provides a bundle of services. To perform this comparison, one would need to break down the total contract value by the types and quantities of resources procured. Market rates can be benchmarked against publicly available pricing from other vendors or industry reports. If the contract includes standard industry publications or databases, comparing their prices here to what other government agencies or academic institutions pay can highlight potential savings or overspending. A lack of detailed cost breakdown makes this specific value-for-money assessment difficult.

What is Cox Subscriptions, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly for library resources?

Evaluating Cox Subscriptions, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts is important for assessing performance risk. Information on past performance, including contract history, past performance evaluations (if available in systems like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any history of disputes or corrective actions, would provide insight. A history of successful, on-time delivery and positive client feedback suggests a lower risk profile. Conversely, a record of performance issues or contract terminations could indicate potential problems. For this specific contract, understanding their experience with similar library resource procurements for agencies like the FDA or HHS would be particularly relevant. Without access to detailed federal procurement databases and performance records, a comprehensive assessment of their track record is limited.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will they be measured?

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this library resources contract are critical for ensuring the FDA receives the expected value and services. While not detailed in the provided summary, typical KPIs could include metrics related to resource availability (uptime for digital resources), timeliness of new acquisitions, accuracy of fulfillment, user satisfaction, and adherence to budget. The contract's success hinges on how effectively these KPIs are defined, measured, and monitored by the government. The firm-fixed-price nature implies that meeting these performance standards is directly tied to the contractor's payment. Regular performance reviews and reporting against these KPIs will be essential for accountability and for identifying any potential issues early in the contract lifecycle.

How does the scope of 'library resources' in this contract compare to typical agency needs?

The scope of 'library resources' under this $15.9 million contract needs to be understood in the context of typical agency needs, especially for an organization like the FDA, which relies heavily on scientific and regulatory information. 'Library resources' can encompass a wide range of items, including scientific journals, databases (e.g., PubMed, Scopus), books, research reports, and potentially digital archiving services. The breadth and depth of these resources directly impact the agency's ability to conduct research, stay abreast of scientific advancements, and fulfill its regulatory mission. If the contract covers a comprehensive suite of high-impact scientific literature and specialized databases, the $15.9 million may represent a sound investment. Conversely, if it focuses on more general resources, the value proposition might differ. Understanding the specific inclusions is key to assessing its adequacy and cost-effectiveness.

Industry Classification

NAICS: InformationNewspaper, Periodical, Book, and Directory PublishersBook Publishers

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 201 VILLAGE RD, SHALLOTTE, NC, 28470

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $42,979,563

Exercised Options: $15,957,542

Current Obligation: $15,957,542

Actual Outlays: $15,957,542

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS02F0147T

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-08-04

Current End Date: 2026-12-31

Potential End Date: 2029-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-23

More Contracts from COX Subscriptions, Inc.

View all COX Subscriptions, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts

View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending