HHS awards $29.9M for Infrastructure as a Service, raising value-for-money questions

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,935,451 ($29.9M)

Contractor: Four Points Technology, L.L.C.

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2021-11-03

End Date: 2024-02-07

Contract Duration: 826 days

Daily Burn Rate: $36.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: INFRASTRUCTURE AS A SERVICE (IAAS) TASK ORDER 6

Place of Performance

Location: CHANTILLY, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20151

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $29.9 million to FOUR POINTS TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C. for work described as: INFRASTRUCTURE AS A SERVICE (IAAS) TASK ORDER 6 Key points: 1. The contract's value-for-money is questionable given the lack of detailed performance metrics and the time-and-materials pricing structure. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open competition, which should theoretically drive better pricing, but the final award price needs further benchmarking. 3. Risk indicators include the use of time-and-materials, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. 4. Performance context is limited, with no clear metrics provided to assess the effectiveness of the Infrastructure as a Service (IAAS) provided. 5. The contract positions the Food and Drug Administration within the broader IT services sector, specifically for cloud computing infrastructure.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The $29.9 million award for Infrastructure as a Service (IAAS) requires deeper analysis to benchmark its value. The time-and-materials (T&M) pricing structure, while flexible, can be less cost-effective than fixed-price contracts if not meticulously managed. Without specific performance metrics or comparisons to similar IAAS procurements by other agencies, it is difficult to definitively assess if the government received optimal value. The total obligated amount of $29.9M over the contract's duration suggests a significant investment that warrants scrutiny regarding efficiency and cost control.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, which limits the assessment of the competitive landscape. However, a full and open competition is generally the preferred method for ensuring a broad range of offers and promoting price discovery. The ultimate price achieved in such a competition is a key indicator of its effectiveness.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for competitive pricing and encourages vendors to offer their best terms to secure the contract.

Public Impact

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the primary beneficiary, receiving essential IT infrastructure services. The services delivered are critical for supporting the FDA's mission-critical operations and data management. The geographic impact is primarily within the FDA's operational centers, supporting its national and potentially international functions. Workforce implications are indirect, likely supporting IT personnel who manage and utilize the IAAS environment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically focusing on Infrastructure as a Service (IAAS). The IAAS market is a rapidly growing segment of cloud computing, providing on-demand computing resources over the internet. Government spending in this area is substantial as agencies migrate from on-premises data centers to cloud-based solutions for scalability, flexibility, and cost-efficiency. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale IAAS procurements by federal agencies for similar services.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary focus is on the prime contractor, Four Points Technology, L.L.C. Analysis of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses would require further investigation into the contractor's subcontracting plan, if applicable. Without this information, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific task order is unclear.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Health and Human Services' procurement and financial management offices. The Food and Drug Administration's program managers are responsible for overseeing the delivery of services and ensuring compliance with contract terms. Transparency is enhanced by the public nature of contract awards, but detailed performance reports and cost breakdowns are often internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it-services, infrastructure-as-a-service, cloud-computing, department-of-health-and-human-services, food-and-drug-administration, full-and-open-competition, time-and-materials, task-order, bpa-call, virginia, large-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $29.9 million to FOUR POINTS TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.. INFRASTRUCTURE AS A SERVICE (IAAS) TASK ORDER 6

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FOUR POINTS TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Food and Drug Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-11-03. End: 2024-02-07.

What is the track record of Four Points Technology, L.L.C. in delivering Infrastructure as a Service (IAAS) to federal agencies?

Four Points Technology, L.L.C. has a history of providing IT services and solutions to the federal government, often through various contract vehicles and schedules. Their experience with IAAS would need to be evaluated by examining past performance on similar contracts, including client satisfaction, adherence to schedules, and technical execution. A review of their contract portfolio with agencies like HHS, GSA, and others would reveal the extent and success of their IAAS delivery capabilities. Specific details on past IAAS projects, including scale, complexity, and outcomes, would be crucial for a comprehensive assessment of their track record in this domain.

How does the awarded price of $29.9 million compare to market rates for similar IAAS solutions provided to federal agencies?

Benchmarking the $29.9 million award against market rates for similar IAAS solutions requires access to detailed pricing data and service level agreements (SLAs) from comparable federal contracts. Factors such as compute, storage, networking, and managed services pricing, along with the specific service tiers and support levels, need to be considered. Without direct comparisons to other government IAAS procurements or commercial cloud offerings with equivalent specifications, a precise value assessment is challenging. The time-and-materials (T&M) nature of the contract further complicates direct price comparison, as actual costs can vary based on labor hours and material usage.

What are the primary risks associated with the time-and-materials (T&M) pricing structure used in this contract?

The primary risk associated with the time-and-materials (T&M) pricing structure is the potential for cost overruns. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts do not have a predetermined ceiling on the total cost, as payment is based on the actual hours worked by contractor personnel and the cost of materials used. This can lead to higher-than-anticipated expenditures if project scope creeps, inefficiencies arise, or labor rates are higher than budgeted. Effective oversight, detailed tracking of hours and materials, and clear definition of work requirements are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure the government receives good value.

What specific performance metrics are in place to measure the effectiveness of the IAAS provided under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the performance metrics used to measure the effectiveness of the Infrastructure as a Service (IAAS) under this contract. Typically, IAAS contracts include Service Level Agreements (SLAs) that define key performance indicators (KPIs) related to uptime, availability, latency, response times, and security. The absence of this information in the summary data makes it difficult to assess whether the Food and Drug Administration is receiving the expected level of service and if the contractor is meeting its obligations. A thorough review of the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) and associated SLAs would be necessary to identify these metrics.

How does this contract's spending compare to historical IAAS spending by the Food and Drug Administration or HHS?

To compare this contract's spending of $29.9 million to historical IAAS spending by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), one would need access to historical procurement data. This would involve analyzing previous contracts for similar IAAS or cloud computing services awarded by these agencies over several fiscal years. Trends in spending, average contract values, and the evolution of IAAS adoption within the FDA/HHS would provide context. Without this historical data, it is challenging to determine if this award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment in IAAS.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the broader IT services market, particularly for cloud infrastructure providers?

This $29.9 million contract for Infrastructure as a Service (IAAS) awarded to Four Points Technology, L.L.C. by the FDA signifies continued government investment in cloud computing solutions. Such awards can influence the broader IT services market by signaling demand for specific cloud capabilities and potentially setting benchmarks for pricing and service delivery. It may encourage competition among cloud providers seeking to secure future government contracts. The success of this contract could also lead to follow-on opportunities or influence how other agencies approach their IAAS procurements, impacting market dynamics and vendor strategies within the federal IT sector.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Wholesale TradeProfessional and Commercial Equipment and Supplies Merchant WholesalersComputer and Computer Peripheral Equipment and Software Merchant Wholesalers

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSIT AND TELECOM - COMPUTE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 14900 CONFERENCE CENTER DR STE 100, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,935,451

Exercised Options: $29,935,451

Current Obligation: $29,935,451

Actual Outlays: $29,935,451

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 75F40118A10038

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2021-11-03

Current End Date: 2024-02-07

Potential End Date: 2024-02-07 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2023-08-08

More Contracts from Four Points Technology, L.L.C.

View all Four Points Technology, L.L.C. federal contracts →

Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts

View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending