TETRA TECH INC Awarded $4.78M for REM Services Across 7 USCG Sites

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,784,058 ($4.8M)

Contractor: Tetra Tech Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2023-03-10

End Date: 2027-03-09

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: REM SERVICES 7 SITES IN USCG LOCATIONS

Place of Performance

Location: WARWICK, KENT County, RHODE ISLAND, 02886

State: Rhode Island Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $4.8 million to TETRA TECH INC for work described as: REM SERVICES 7 SITES IN USCG LOCATIONS Key points: 1. Contract awarded under firm-fixed-price terms, indicating predictable costs for the government. 2. Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process, potentially leading to competitive pricing. 3. The contract duration of 1460 days (4 years) provides long-term service stability. 4. Services are for REM (Remote Environmental Monitoring?) across multiple USCG locations, suggesting a critical operational need. 5. The award is a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar framework. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized, indicating the primary awardee is not a small business.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $4.78 million over approximately four years averages to about $1.2 million annually. Without specific details on the scope of 'REM SERVICES' and the number of sites, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs. Benchmarking against similar environmental monitoring or engineering support contracts would provide further insight into whether this pricing is competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This typically involves a formal solicitation process where multiple companies can compete. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open competition generally fosters price discovery and encourages contractors to offer their best terms.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for receiving competitive pricing and ensures a wide range of qualified contractors can bid, potentially lowering overall costs.

Public Impact

The U.S. Coast Guard benefits from essential REM services, likely supporting environmental compliance and operational readiness. Seven specific USCG locations across the United States will receive these critical services. The contract supports engineering services, contributing to the technical infrastructure and capabilities of the Coast Guard. The duration of the contract ensures continuity of these vital services over a four-year period.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS code 541330). This sector encompasses firms that provide engineering consulting and design services. The U.S. government is a significant consumer of these services for infrastructure, defense, and operational support. Spending in this sector is often driven by specific project needs, regulatory requirements, and the maintenance of existing assets. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend on the specific type and scale of engineering services required.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the primary focus was on obtaining the best value from the broadest possible pool of contractors, rather than specifically targeting small businesses for this particular award. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans or goals for small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the U.S. Coast Guard, a component of the Department of Homeland Security. As a delivery order, it likely falls under a larger IDIQ contract which may have its own oversight framework. Accountability measures would be tied to the firm-fixed-price terms and performance expectations outlined in the contract. Transparency is facilitated by the public award data, but detailed performance reports or Inspector General involvement would depend on specific contract clauses and any identified issues.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, environmental-monitoring, department-of-homeland-security, u-s-coast-guard, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, tetra-tech-inc, multi-site, federal-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $4.8 million to TETRA TECH INC. REM SERVICES 7 SITES IN USCG LOCATIONS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TETRA TECH INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-03-10. End: 2027-03-09.

What specific services fall under 'REM SERVICES' and what is the expected outcome or deliverable?

The acronym 'REM SERVICES' is not explicitly defined in the provided data. However, given the context of the U.S. Coast Guard and engineering services, it likely pertains to Remote Environmental Monitoring or similar services. This could involve deploying, maintaining, and analyzing data from sensors and equipment designed to monitor environmental conditions at various Coast Guard installations. Expected outcomes could include ensuring regulatory compliance, assessing environmental impact, supporting infrastructure maintenance, or providing data for operational decision-making. A detailed statement of work within the contract would clarify the precise services, deliverables, and performance standards.

How does the $4.78 million contract value compare to similar engineering support contracts for the U.S. Coast Guard?

Comparing the $4.78 million value requires understanding the specific nature of the REM services. If these are routine environmental monitoring and maintenance tasks across seven sites, the annual value of approximately $1.2 million might be reasonable. However, if the services involve complex engineering studies, specialized equipment deployment, or extensive data analysis, this value could be on the lower end. Benchmarking against other contracts for similar scope (e.g., environmental consulting, facilities engineering support, sensor network management) awarded to the U.S. Coast Guard or other Department of Homeland Security agencies would be necessary for a precise comparison. Publicly available contract databases can provide such comparative data.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract and how is performance measured?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for engineering and environmental services, KPIs might include timeliness of service delivery, accuracy of data collected, equipment uptime and reliability, compliance with reporting requirements, and adherence to safety protocols. Performance measurement would likely involve regular progress reports from Tetra Tech Inc., site inspections, data validation, and potentially user feedback from the U.S. Coast Guard personnel at the seven affected locations. The contract's statement of work and performance-based clauses would detail these metrics and measurement methods.

What is Tetra Tech Inc.'s track record with the U.S. Coast Guard and Department of Homeland Security?

Tetra Tech Inc. is a large, well-established engineering and environmental consulting firm that has a significant history of contracting with various U.S. federal agencies, including the Department of Defense, EPA, and likely the Department of Homeland Security and its components like the U.S. Coast Guard. While this specific award is for $4.78 million, their broader portfolio includes much larger contracts for infrastructure design, environmental remediation, and program management. A review of federal procurement data (e.g., FPDS) would reveal the extent and nature of their past performance with the USCG and DHS, including contract values, types of services rendered, and any reported performance issues or accolades.

What is the historical spending trend for similar REM or environmental services by the U.S. Coast Guard?

Analyzing historical spending trends for 'REM SERVICES' by the U.S. Coast Guard requires identifying comparable contract descriptions or NAICS codes. Without a precise definition of 'REM SERVICES', it's difficult to pinpoint exact historical figures. However, the Coast Guard, like other maritime and security agencies, invests significantly in environmental compliance, infrastructure maintenance, and operational support services. Spending on engineering, environmental consulting, and monitoring services can fluctuate based on infrastructure projects, regulatory changes, and operational tempo. Examining past contract awards for environmental assessments, monitoring systems, and related engineering support over the last 5-10 years would provide context on the typical investment levels for such services.

Are there any specific risks associated with the geographic distribution of the seven USCG locations?

The geographic distribution of the seven USCG locations could introduce several risks. If these sites are geographically dispersed across the U.S., it could increase logistical costs and travel time for Tetra Tech Inc.'s personnel, potentially impacting service delivery efficiency and overall cost, despite the firm-fixed-price structure. Response times to urgent issues might vary depending on location. Furthermore, differing environmental regulations or site-specific challenges at each location could complicate service provision. Effective contract management would require clear protocols for site access, communication, and standardized service delivery, while acknowledging and mitigating location-specific risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENTNATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVERVAT SVCS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Tetra Tech, Inc.

Address: 1230 COLUMBIA ST STE 1000, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92101

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,784,058

Exercised Options: $4,784,058

Current Obligation: $4,784,058

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSHA20D000R

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2023-03-10

Current End Date: 2027-03-09

Potential End Date: 2027-03-09 11:27:33

Last Modified: 2026-03-30

More Contracts from Tetra Tech Inc

View all Tetra Tech Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Homeland Security Contracts

View all Department of Homeland Security contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending