DHS awards $4.2M contract for screening support services to Guidehouse Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,233,156 ($4.2M)

Contractor: Guidehouse Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2021-09-10

End Date: 2024-09-09

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ON PERSON SCREENING (OPS) CAPABILITY STRATEGIC SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: SPRINGFIELD, LOUDOUN County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20598

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $4.2 million to GUIDEHOUSE INC. for work described as: ON PERSON SCREENING (OPS) CAPABILITY STRATEGIC SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract provides strategic support for On Person Screening (OPS) capabilities. 2. Services are categorized under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting. 3. The contract was awarded using full and open competition. 4. Duration of the contract is 1095 days. 5. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating predictable costs. 6. Awarded as a BPA Call, suggesting it's part of a larger framework agreement.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $4.2 million over three years for specialized consulting services appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting within federal agencies suggests this is within expected ranges for strategic support. The firm fixed-price structure helps control costs, though the specific value-for-money depends on the quality and impact of the services delivered.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. This process generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service quality. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the method of competition suggests a robust selection process.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the best value for the government's investment in screening support capabilities.

Public Impact

Benefits the Department of Homeland Security, specifically the Transportation Security Administration. Enhances the strategic support for On Person Screening (OPS) capabilities. Services are delivered within the District of Columbia. Supports the operational efficiency and effectiveness of TSA's screening processes.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically management consulting. The federal government frequently procures these types of services to support strategic planning, operational improvements, and policy development across various agencies. Spending in this category is substantial, with agencies like DHS relying on external expertise for specialized functions such as enhancing screening capabilities.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any small business set-aside or subcontracting requirements for this contract. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the TSA. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award being publicly available. Accountability is inherent in the firm fixed-price structure, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within budget. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

dhs, tsa, consulting-services, management-consulting, strategic-support, on-person-screening, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, bpa-call, district-of-columbia, federal-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $4.2 million to GUIDEHOUSE INC.. ON PERSON SCREENING (OPS) CAPABILITY STRATEGIC SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GUIDEHOUSE INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-09-10. End: 2024-09-09.

What specific deliverables are expected under this "ON PERSON SCREENING (OPS) CAPABILITY STRATEGIC SUPPORT" contract?

The contract description 'ON PERSON SCREENING (OPS) CAPABILITY STRATEGIC SUPPORT' is broad. Specific deliverables would typically be detailed in the Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) attached to the contract. These could include strategic plans, operational assessments, technology recommendations, policy analysis, training development frameworks, or process improvement roadmaps related to how individuals are screened. Without access to the SOW/PWS, the exact nature of the deliverables remains unspecified, but they are aimed at enhancing the strategic effectiveness of OPS capabilities for the TSA.

How does the $4.2 million award compare to historical spending on similar OPS support contracts by TSA or DHS?

Benchmarking this $4.2 million contract requires comparing it to similar strategic support or management consulting contracts for screening capabilities within TSA or DHS. While specific historical data for 'OPS Capability Strategic Support' is not provided, TSA and DHS have historically awarded significant contracts for security technology, operational consulting, and program management. A $4.2 million award over three years for specialized strategic support is likely within the typical range for such services, especially considering the complexity of national security screening operations. However, a precise comparison would necessitate analyzing the scope, duration, and specific services of past contracts.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of Guidehouse Inc.'s services under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, KPIs are defined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and are crucial for evaluating contractor performance. For a strategic support contract like this, KPIs might relate to the timeliness of strategic plan delivery, the quality of recommendations (e.g., feasibility, cost-effectiveness), the successful implementation of recommended process improvements, or measurable enhancements in screening efficiency or effectiveness as defined by TSA. Without the PWS, assessing performance measurement is not possible.

What is Guidehouse Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly within DHS or TSA, for similar services?

Guidehouse Inc. has a significant track record of performing federal contracts across various agencies, including DHS. They specialize in management consulting, technology, and risk advisory services. While this specific contract focuses on OPS strategic support, Guidehouse has likely undertaken related work in areas such as program management, cybersecurity, financial management, and operational efficiency for federal clients. Their experience in complex government environments suggests they possess the capabilities to deliver strategic support. A deeper dive into their contract history would reveal specific past performance on similar projects.

What is the potential risk associated with relying on a single contractor for strategic support in a critical area like OPS?

The primary risk associated with relying on a single contractor for strategic support in a critical area like OPS is the potential for knowledge transfer gaps if the contract ends or the contractor is changed. There's also a risk of vendor lock-in, where the agency becomes overly dependent on the contractor's specific methodologies or personnel. Furthermore, if the contractor's performance is subpar, it could delay or negatively impact the enhancement of critical screening capabilities. However, the use of full and open competition for award and clear performance standards in the SOW can mitigate some of these risks by ensuring quality and providing options for future procurements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Veritas Capital Fund Management, L.L.C.

Address: 1676 INTERNATIONAL DR STE 800, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,238,695

Exercised Options: $4,238,695

Current Obligation: $4,233,156

Actual Outlays: $3,172,990

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70T04021A7672N001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2021-09-10

Current End Date: 2024-09-09

Potential End Date: 2024-09-09 12:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-02-05

More Contracts from Guidehouse Inc.

View all Guidehouse Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Homeland Security Contracts

View all Department of Homeland Security contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending