Homeland Security awards $7.1M contract for protective security officers in Fort Worth, Texas

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $7,127,156 ($7.1M)

Contractor: American Eagle Protective Services Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2025-11-01

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 241 days

Daily Burn Rate: $29.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER ARMED SERVICES THROUGHOUT FORT WORTH, TEXAS

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, TARRANT County, TEXAS, 76006

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $7.1 million to AMERICAN EAGLE PROTECTIVE SERVICES CORP for work described as: PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER ARMED SERVICES THROUGHOUT FORT WORTH, TEXAS Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration is 241 days, indicating a short-term need for services. 3. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which helps in budget predictability. 4. The services are for armed protective security officers, a critical security function. 5. The award was made by the Office of Procurement Operations within DHS. 6. The contractor, American Eagle Protective Services Corp, will provide services throughout Fort Worth, Texas.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $7.1M for approximately 8 months of service for armed protective security officers appears to be within a reasonable range for such specialized services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for armed security personnel in major metropolitan areas would provide a more precise assessment of value for money. The firm fixed-price structure offers cost certainty for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The number of bidders is not specified, but this method generally fosters price discovery and encourages competitive pricing. The government likely received multiple proposals, allowing for selection of the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of qualified contractors, potentially reducing overall costs.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Homeland Security and its facilities in Fort Worth, Texas, which will receive enhanced security. The services delivered include armed protective security, ensuring a secure environment. The geographic impact is concentrated within Fort Worth, Texas. The contract supports the employment of armed security professionals.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for contractor performance issues given the critical nature of armed security services.
Dependence on a single contractor for essential security functions during the contract period.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty.
Contract duration is clearly defined, allowing for focused service delivery.

Sector Analysis

The security services sector is a significant part of the government contracting landscape, encompassing a wide range of protective and investigative services. Contracts for armed security personnel are particularly sensitive due to the inherent risks and specialized training required. Spending in this area is often driven by national security concerns and the need to protect federal assets and personnel. This contract fits within the broader category of security and protective services, a market characterized by numerous providers ranging from large corporations to smaller specialized firms.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business set-aside was not utilized for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside. The prime contractor, American Eagle Protective Services Corp, may or may not be a small business itself, but the award was not made through a small business set-aside program.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Homeland Security's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified services at an agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Protective Service Contracts
Department of Homeland Security Security Services
Armed Guard Services Contracts
Security Services for Federal Facilities

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues
Adequacy of contractor vetting
Effectiveness of armed response protocols

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $7.1 million to AMERICAN EAGLE PROTECTIVE SERVICES CORP. PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER ARMED SERVICES THROUGHOUT FORT WORTH, TEXAS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMERICAN EAGLE PROTECTIVE SERVICES CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Office of Procurement Operations).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $7.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-11-01. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the track record of American Eagle Protective Services Corp with federal contracts, particularly for security services?

A review of federal contract databases would be necessary to fully assess the track record of American Eagle Protective Services Corp. This would involve examining past performance on similar contracts, including any awards, penalties, or disputes. Understanding their history with the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies would provide insight into their reliability and capability in delivering protective security services. Specific details on past performance metrics, client satisfaction, and adherence to contract terms would be crucial for a comprehensive evaluation.

How does the per-day cost of this contract compare to similar armed security contracts in Texas or other major metropolitan areas?

To benchmark the value for money, the total contract value ($7,127,156.44) can be divided by the contract duration in days (241) to get a daily cost of approximately $29,573. This daily rate needs to be compared against similar contracts for armed protective security officers in comparable geographic locations and for similar service levels. Factors such as the number of officers required, their armament, training, and the specific security requirements of the facilities will influence these costs. Without access to a database of comparable contract pricing, a precise benchmark is difficult, but this figure provides a starting point for analysis.

What are the specific security risks associated with the services being provided under this contract?

The primary security risks associated with providing armed protective security officers involve potential use of force, contractor personnel misconduct, and the possibility of security breaches if officers are inadequately trained or vigilant. Risks also include the contractor's ability to maintain adequate staffing levels, especially during emergencies or high-demand periods. Furthermore, ensuring compliance with all federal regulations, use-of-force policies, and background check requirements for armed personnel is critical. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract could incentivize cost-cutting that might inadvertently impact service quality or risk mitigation if not properly overseen.

What is the expected effectiveness of these security services in enhancing the safety of DHS facilities in Fort Worth?

The effectiveness of these security services hinges on several factors, including the quality of the personnel provided by American Eagle Protective Services Corp, the clarity and adequacy of the post orders, and the level of integration with existing DHS security protocols. Armed officers are expected to deter potential threats, respond to incidents, and maintain a secure perimeter. Their presence should significantly enhance the safety and security posture of the facilities. However, effectiveness is also dependent on ongoing performance monitoring by DHS, regular training, and robust incident response planning.

What has been the historical spending by the Department of Homeland Security on security guard and patrol services in Texas?

Analyzing historical spending by DHS on security guard and patrol services in Texas would provide context for this $7.1M contract. This would involve querying federal procurement data to identify trends in contract awards, average contract values, and the types of services procured within the state. Understanding past spending patterns can help determine if this award is consistent with previous investments, if there has been an increase or decrease in demand for such services, and which contractors have been historically successful in securing these types of awards within Texas.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 902 CRYSTAL FALLS PKWY, LEANDER, TX, 78641

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $7,127,156

Exercised Options: $7,127,156

Current Obligation: $7,127,156

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70RFP420DE7000002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline