Homeland Security awards $8.3M for PSO services in Maryland, with Bradley Technologies Inc. as prime

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,295,893 ($8.3M)

Contractor: Bradley Technologies Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2025-10-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $22.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER (PSO) SERVICES IN MARYLAND

Place of Performance

Location: HYATTSVILLE, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20782

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $8.3 million to BRADLEY TECHNOLOGIES INC for work described as: PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER (PSO) SERVICES IN MARYLAND Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for security services in Maryland. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. No specific risk indicators are immediately apparent from the provided data. 4. Contract performance period is one year, aligning with typical service agreements. 5. This contract falls within the security services sector, a common area for federal procurement. 6. The award amount is modest within the broader context of federal security spending.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $8.3 million for one year of Protective Security Officer (PSO) services in Maryland seems aligned with market rates for similar security contracts. Benchmarking against other federal contracts for PSO services in comparable geographic regions would provide a more precise value assessment. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the government has negotiated a set rate, which can be advantageous for cost control.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that the solicitation was broadly advertised and multiple bidders were likely considered. This method generally promotes a competitive environment, allowing for price discovery and potentially leading to better value for the government. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the chosen competition type suggests a robust process.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to bid, driving down prices and ensuring the government receives competitive offers.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are federal agencies requiring security services within Maryland. The contract delivers essential protective security officer services. The geographic impact is focused on Maryland. The contract supports jobs within the security guard and patrol services industry.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs.
Contract duration of one year allows for regular performance review.
The contractor, Bradley Technologies Inc., is a known entity in this space.

Sector Analysis

The security services sector is a significant component of federal procurement, encompassing a wide range of protective and support functions. This contract for Protective Security Officers (PSOs) fits within the broader Security Guards and Patrol Services industry (NAICS 561612). Federal spending in this area is substantial, driven by the need to protect government facilities, personnel, and assets across various agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other contracts for similar security services across different federal departments and geographic locations.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside requirement for this contract. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications mandated by a small business set-aside. The prime contractor, Bradley Technologies Inc., may still engage small businesses as subcontractors, but this is not explicitly detailed in the award information. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether Bradley Technologies Inc. actively seeks out small business partners for this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Homeland Security's contracting and program management offices. The Office of Procurement Operations is listed as the servicing agency. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver services as specified. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Protective Service Contracts
Department of Homeland Security Security Services
Security Guard Services
Facility Security Contracts

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $8.3 million to BRADLEY TECHNOLOGIES INC. PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER (PSO) SERVICES IN MARYLAND

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BRADLEY TECHNOLOGIES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Office of Procurement Operations).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the track record of Bradley Technologies Inc. in performing federal security contracts?

Bradley Technologies Inc. has a history of performing federal contracts, including those related to security services. A deeper dive into their past performance, particularly with the Department of Homeland Security or similar agencies, would be necessary to fully assess their track record. This would involve reviewing past contract awards, performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any history of disputes or contract terminations. Understanding their experience with Protective Security Officer (PSO) services specifically, and in the Maryland region, would provide further context on their capability to successfully execute this current award.

How does the awarded price compare to similar PSO contracts in Maryland?

Without access to a comprehensive database of current and historical PSO contract pricing specifically for Maryland, a precise comparison is challenging. However, the total award of $8.3 million for a 364-day period suggests an average daily rate. Benchmarking this against publicly available data for similar federal or state contracts in the region would be the next step. Factors such as the number of officers required, their specific duties, security clearances, and the level of risk associated with the sites being protected significantly influence pricing. The firm fixed-price nature indicates a negotiated rate that should reflect market conditions at the time of award.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract award?

The primary risks associated with this contract are generally related to contractor performance and potential cost overruns if not managed effectively. Performance risks include the contractor's ability to consistently provide qualified and reliable security personnel, maintain adequate staffing levels, and adhere to all security protocols and post orders. There's also a risk of unforeseen security incidents requiring enhanced services beyond the scope, though the firm fixed-price contract aims to mitigate this. Operational risks might include challenges in recruitment and retention of security staff in the local labor market. The government's risk is mitigated by the competitive bidding process and ongoing contract oversight.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method for this type of service?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method is generally effective for procuring services like Protective Security Officers (PSOs) because it allows for a broad range of potential contractors to compete while also providing a mechanism to exclude specific sources if necessary (though the reason for exclusion isn't detailed here). This approach balances the benefits of wide competition, which drives down prices and encourages innovation, with the agency's need to potentially manage its vendor pool. For standard services like PSO, where multiple qualified vendors typically exist, this method is a robust way to ensure fair pricing and access to capable providers.

What is the historical spending trend for PSO services by the Department of Homeland Security in Maryland?

Analyzing historical spending trends for PSO services by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in Maryland would require access to detailed procurement data over several fiscal years. This would involve querying databases like FPDS or USASpending to identify all contracts awarded by DHS for security guard and patrol services within the state. Trends might reveal an increasing or decreasing demand for these services, fluctuations in average contract values, and the dominant contractors in the region. Such analysis could help determine if the current $8.3 million award is consistent with past spending patterns or represents a significant deviation.

Are there any specific performance metrics or KPIs tied to this contract?

The provided award data does not explicitly detail specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or performance metrics for this contract. However, for a Protective Security Officer (PSO) services contract, standard performance expectations typically include metrics related to officer presence and punctuality, adherence to post orders, incident reporting accuracy and timeliness, uniform and appearance standards, and overall effectiveness in maintaining security. The government contracting officer and COR (Contracting Officer's Representative) would monitor these aspects, and performance evaluations would be documented, influencing future contract awards and contractor performance ratings.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1700 ROCKVILLE PIKE STE 200, ROCKVILLE, MD, 20852

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,295,893

Exercised Options: $8,295,893

Current Obligation: $8,295,893

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70RFP223DEC000004

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline