DHS awards $3.27M for security services to Chenega NASWIK International LLC, with a 237-day duration

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,273,184 ($3.3M)

Contractor: Chenega Naswik International LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2025-08-06

End Date: 2026-03-31

Contract Duration: 237 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ENTERPRISE SECURITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTERS - GLYNCO, GA

Place of Performance

Location: BRUNSWICK, GLYNN County, GEORGIA, 31524

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $3.3 million to CHENEGA NASWIK INTERNATIONAL LLC for work described as: ENTERPRISE SECURITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTERS - GLYNCO, GA Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the scope of security and administrative services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract is a delivery order, indicating it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. 4. Performance period is relatively short, suggesting a need for ongoing or recurring services. 5. The services are critical for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center's operations. 6. No small business set-aside was applied, which is typical for this type of service contract.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.27 million for approximately 8 months of security and administrative services seems aligned with market rates for similar federal contracts. Benchmarking against other security guard contracts for federal facilities of comparable size and scope would provide further validation. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs for the government. Without specific details on the number of personnel or hours, a precise per-unit cost comparison is difficult, but the overall value appears fair.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that multiple vendors were likely solicited. The specific exclusion of sources suggests a prior contract or relationship that was reviewed, but ultimately the award was made through a competitive process. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation implies a robust competition was intended and likely achieved, which is generally favorable for price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down prices and encouraging vendors to offer their best value. This approach minimizes the risk of overpayment and promotes a fair market for government services.

Public Impact

Federal law enforcement personnel and trainees at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) in Georgia will benefit from enhanced security and administrative support. The contract ensures the continued provision of essential security guard and patrol services, maintaining a safe and secure training environment. The geographic impact is localized to the FLETC facility in Glynnco, Georgia. The contract supports jobs within the security services industry, likely benefiting personnel employed by Chenega NASWIK International LLC.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Short performance period could necessitate frequent re-competition, leading to potential transition costs and disruptions.
Reliance on a single delivery order under a potentially larger IDIQ could concentrate risk if the prime contract has issues.
The specific nature of 'administrative services' alongside security requires clear delineation of duties to avoid scope creep or overlap.

Positive Signals

Award to an established contractor like Chenega NASWIK International LLC suggests a track record of performance.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition indicates a commitment to seeking the best value from the market.

Sector Analysis

The security services sector is a significant component of federal contracting, encompassing a wide range of needs from physical security to cybersecurity. This contract falls within the physical security and guard services sub-sector. Federal spending in this area is consistently high, driven by the need to protect government facilities and personnel. Comparable contracts often involve similar firm-fixed-price structures and competitive solicitations, with pricing influenced by labor costs, geographic location, and the specific security requirements.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses indicated in the provided data. Chenega NASWIK International LLC is likely a larger entity. The absence of a small business set-aside means that opportunities for smaller firms to directly participate in this specific contract are limited, though they may be involved as subcontractors if the prime contractor chooses to engage them.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). As a delivery order under a larger contract, oversight mechanisms are likely integrated into the parent IDIQ's management structure. The firm-fixed-price nature simplifies financial oversight. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Federal Law Enforcement Training Center Operations
Department of Homeland Security Security Contracts
General Services Administration (GSA) Schedules (if applicable to parent IDIQ)
Security Guard Services Federal Contracts

Risk Flags

Short contract duration may require frequent re-competition.
Potential for scope creep with combined security and administrative services.
Dependence on parent IDIQ contract structure.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $3.3 million to CHENEGA NASWIK INTERNATIONAL LLC. ENTERPRISE SECURITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTERS - GLYNCO, GA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CHENEGA NASWIK INTERNATIONAL LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Federal Law Enforcement Training Center).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-08-06. End: 2026-03-31.

What is the track record of Chenega NASWIK International LLC with the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center or similar DHS facilities?

Chenega NASWIK International LLC has a history of federal contracting, including with the Department of Homeland Security. While specific performance details with FLETC are not provided in this data snippet, their presence as a contractor suggests they have met requirements for previous awards. A deeper dive into their contract history, including past performance evaluations and any reported issues, would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment. Their ability to secure this delivery order indicates a level of confidence from the awarding agency based on their prior experience or competitive offering.

How does the per-day cost of this contract compare to similar security services at other federal training facilities?

The total contract value is $3,273,183.92 over a period of 237 days (approximately 8 months). This equates to a daily rate of roughly $13,811. This figure represents the total cost for all services rendered per day. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare this to the daily cost of similar security guard and patrol services at other federal training centers, considering factors like the number of personnel, hours of coverage, and specific security requirements. Without more granular data on staffing and service levels, a precise comparison is challenging, but this daily burn rate provides a starting point for value assessment.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific delivery order?

Key risks include the short performance period, which necessitates timely renewal or re-competition, potentially leading to service gaps or increased costs if market conditions change unfavorably. Another risk is the potential for scope creep, particularly with the inclusion of 'administrative services' alongside security, which requires clear definition and management. Dependence on the parent IDIQ contract also introduces risk; any issues with the overarching contract could impact this delivery order. Finally, reliance on a single contractor, even if competitively selected, carries inherent risks related to performance consistency and unforeseen contractor issues.

What is the expected effectiveness of these security services in maintaining the safety and security of FLETC operations?

The effectiveness is expected to be high, given that security guard and patrol services are a core function for facilities like FLETC, which train federal law enforcement. The contract's firm-fixed-price nature incentivizes the contractor to deliver services efficiently. The full and open competition process should have selected a vendor capable of meeting the required security standards. The short duration suggests these services are critical and ongoing, implying a proven need and a well-understood operational requirement that the selected vendor is expected to fulfill effectively.

How does current spending on security services at FLETC compare to historical spending patterns?

This data point represents a single delivery order valued at $3.27 million for a period of approximately 8 months. To assess historical spending patterns, one would need to examine all prior contracts awarded to FLETC for security and administrative services, looking at both individual contract values and the aggregate spending over multiple fiscal years. Analyzing trends in contract duration, competition levels, and contractor performance would provide a comprehensive view. Without access to FLETC's complete contract history, it's impossible to determine if this award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of spending compared to the past.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 70LGLY24RGLB00018

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 14420 ALBEMARLE POINT PL STE 100, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,144,351

Exercised Options: $4,144,351

Current Obligation: $3,273,184

Actual Outlays: $373,154

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70LGLY25DGLB00009

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline