FEMA's $97.3M contract with Torrent Technologies Inc. for flood insurance facilitation shows a significant investment in direct government policy

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $97,310,104 ($97.3M)

Contractor: Torrent Technologies, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2022-09-30

End Date: 2025-06-27

Contract Duration: 1,001 days

Daily Burn Rate: $97.2K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CONTRACTOR SUPPORT TO FACILITATE A PROPERTY OWNER'S INSURANCE AGENT OBTAINING FLOOD INSURANCE FOR THEIR CLIENT, THE HOMEOWNER, DIRECTLY FROM THE GOVERNMENT RATHER THROUGH A WYO COMPANY. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PERSONNEL, FACILITIES, EQUIPME

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20472

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $97.3 million to TORRENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for work described as: CONTRACTOR SUPPORT TO FACILITATE A PROPERTY OWNER'S INSURANCE AGENT OBTAINING FLOOD INSURANCE FOR THEIR CLIENT, THE HOMEOWNER, DIRECTLY FROM THE GOVERNMENT RATHER THROUGH A WYO COMPANY. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PERSONNEL, FACILITIES, EQUIPME Key points: 1. This contract represents a direct government approach to flood insurance, bypassing traditional WYO (Write Your Own) companies. 2. The firm fixed-price structure aims to control costs for a critical government service. 3. A single award suggests potential limitations in market competition or a specific need for Torrent's expertise. 4. The contract duration extends into mid-2025, indicating a sustained operational requirement. 5. Focus on property owner support highlights a direct consumer benefit within the insurance process. 6. The geographic focus on Washington D.C. may indicate a pilot program or specific regional needs.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $97.3 million over its period is substantial for facilitating insurance processes. Benchmarking this specific service is challenging due to its unique nature of direct government facilitation. However, the firm fixed-price contract type suggests an attempt to cap costs. Without comparable contracts for direct government flood insurance facilitation, a precise value-for-money assessment is difficult, but the scale indicates a significant commitment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This approach is typically used when a specific contractor possesses unique capabilities or when urgency dictates a rapid award. The lack of competition means that pricing and service levels were not tested against market alternatives, potentially leading to higher costs or less innovation than a competitive process might yield.

Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source nature means taxpayers did not benefit from competitive bidding, which could have driven down costs. The government relied on negotiating directly with Torrent Technologies, Inc.

Public Impact

Homeowners and property owners seeking flood insurance directly from the government benefit from a streamlined process. Insurance agents acting on behalf of property owners are provided with a direct channel to obtain flood insurance. The contract supports the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) mission to provide flood insurance coverage. The primary geographic impact appears to be within Washington D.C., suggesting a localized or pilot implementation.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader insurance and financial services sector, specifically focusing on government-administered insurance programs. The market for flood insurance is complex, often involving government backstops or direct provision due to the high risk and catastrophic nature of floods. FEMA's National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) is a significant entity in this space. This contract appears to be an effort to streamline or alter the delivery mechanism of that program.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless Torrent Technologies, Inc. voluntarily engages small businesses in its subcontracting efforts.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Department of Homeland Security's internal oversight mechanisms. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply to investigate fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

insurance, flood-insurance, fema, department-of-homeland-security, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, direct-contract, property-owner-support, washington-dc, torrent-technologies-inc

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $97.3 million to TORRENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. CONTRACTOR SUPPORT TO FACILITATE A PROPERTY OWNER'S INSURANCE AGENT OBTAINING FLOOD INSURANCE FOR THEIR CLIENT, THE HOMEOWNER, DIRECTLY FROM THE GOVERNMENT RATHER THROUGH A WYO COMPANY. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PERSONNEL, FACILITIES, EQUIPME

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TORRENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Federal Emergency Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $97.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-09-30. End: 2025-06-27.

What is the specific role of Torrent Technologies, Inc. in facilitating flood insurance?

Torrent Technologies, Inc. is contracted to directly facilitate property owners' insurance agents in obtaining flood insurance for their clients from the government. This bypasses the traditional route through Write Your Own (WYO) companies. The contractor is responsible for furnishing all necessary personnel, facilities, and equipment to manage this process, aiming to streamline the acquisition of flood insurance directly from FEMA rather than through intermediaries.

How does this contract's value compare to similar government insurance facilitation services?

Direct comparison is challenging as this contract's function is unique, focusing on direct government facilitation of flood insurance. Traditional insurance administration contracts might exist, but the specific mechanism of bypassing WYO companies makes benchmarking difficult. The $97.3 million value over its term indicates a significant investment in this direct service model. Without more specific data on comparable sole-source or direct government insurance facilitation contracts, a precise value assessment relative to market rates is not feasible.

What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source award for this service?

The primary risks of a sole-source award include a lack of competitive pressure, which could lead to inflated pricing and reduced service innovation. Taxpayers may not receive the best possible value compared to a competed contract. Furthermore, the absence of multiple bidders limits the government's ability to explore alternative solutions or leverage market competition to its advantage. Transparency regarding the justification for the sole-source award and the negotiated price is also reduced.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the flood insurance market?

This contract signifies a potential shift in FEMA's approach to flood insurance delivery, moving towards more direct government involvement and potentially reducing reliance on the WYO program. It could streamline the process for policyholders and agents by offering a direct channel. However, the long-term impact on the broader flood insurance market, including private insurers and WYO companies, will depend on the scale and success of this direct facilitation model and whether it expands beyond its current scope.

What oversight mechanisms are in place for this contract?

Oversight for this contract is managed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) within the Department of Homeland Security. As a firm fixed-price contract, the primary financial oversight focuses on ensuring the contractor meets the defined scope of work within the agreed-upon price. Standard contract administration processes, performance reviews, and potentially audits by FEMA or the DHS Inspector General would be in place to ensure compliance and accountability.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Finance and InsuranceAgencies, Brokerages, and Other Insurance Related ActivitiesPharmacy Benefit Management and Other Third Party Administration of Insurance and Pension Funds

Product/Service Code: SOCIAL SERVICESSOCIAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1935 3RD AVE E # 100, KALISPELL, MT, 59901

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $112,829,683

Exercised Options: $112,829,683

Current Obligation: $97,310,104

Actual Outlays: $66,542,942

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2022-09-30

Current End Date: 2025-06-27

Potential End Date: 2026-03-27 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-02

More Contracts from Torrent Technologies, Inc.

View all Torrent Technologies, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Homeland Security Contracts

View all Department of Homeland Security contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending