DoD Awards Northrop Grumman $32.8M for Technical Assistance Services, Competition Raises Value Concerns

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $32,835,823 ($32.8M)

Contractor: Northrop Grumman Information Technology Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-10-14

End Date: 2010-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,812 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200603!000100!5700!FA4600!55CONS/CC !DCA20002D5010 !A!N! !Y!6U01 !01 !20051014!20060930!064677243!016435559!016435559!N!NORTHROP GRUMMAN INFORMATION T!7575 COLSHIRE DRIVE !MC LEAN !VA!22102!35875!153!31!OFFUTT AFB !SARPY !NEBRASKA !+000001384123!N!N!000000000000!R421!TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541512!E! !5!B!M!C!A! !99990909!B!F!Y!N!Z!A!N!R!2!002!F! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!C!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: OFFUTT AFB, SARPY County, NEBRASKA, 68113, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Nebraska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $32.8 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC for work described as: 200603!000100!5700!FA4600!55CONS/CC !DCA20002D5010 !A!N! !Y!6U01 !01 !20051014!20060930!064677243!016435559!016435559!N!NORTHROP GRUMMAN INFORMATION T!7575 COLSHIRE DRIVE !MC LEAN !VA!22102!35875!153!31!OFFUTT AFB !SARPY !NEBRASKA !+000001384123!N!N!000000000000!R421!TECHNICAL AS… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Northrop Grumman for technical assistance services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, but the contract type (Cost Plus Award Fee) may inflate costs. 3. The duration of 1812 days (approx. 5 years) suggests a significant, long-term need. 4. The sector is IT services, specifically Computer Systems Design Services.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract type allows for cost reimbursement plus an award fee, which can incentivize performance but also lead to higher overall costs compared to fixed-price contracts. Without more data on the award fee structure and performance metrics, it's difficult to definitively assess value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating multiple bidders were considered. However, the CPAF structure might not be the most cost-effective for this type of service, potentially impacting price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: While competition is present, the CPAF structure warrants scrutiny to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently and that the award fee is tied to demonstrable value.

Public Impact

Citizens rely on the Department of Defense for national security, and efficient spending ensures resources are available for critical missions. Technical assistance services are crucial for maintaining complex defense systems and infrastructure. Transparency in contracting, especially with cost-reimbursement elements, builds public trust in government spending.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically Computer Systems Design Services. Spending in this area is substantial across the government, supporting everything from cybersecurity to data management. Benchmarks for similar services vary widely based on complexity and duration.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was awarded to a large business (Northrop Grumman). There is no specific information provided regarding set-asides for small businesses or their participation in this particular contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Air Force, a component of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve contract officers, program managers, and potentially inspectors general to ensure compliance and performance.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

computer-systems-design-services, department-of-defense, ne, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $32.8 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC. 200603!000100!5700!FA4600!55CONS/CC !DCA20002D5010 !A!N! !Y!6U01 !01 !20051014!20060930!064677243!016435559!016435559!N!NORTHROP GRUMMAN INFORMATION T!7575 COLSHIRE DRIVE !MC LEAN !VA!22102!35875!153!31!OFFUTT AFB !SARPY !NEBRASKA !+000001384123!N!N!000000000000!R421!TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541512!E! !5!B!M!C!A! !99990909!B!F!Y!N!Z!A!N!R!2!002!F! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!C!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $32.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-10-14. End: 2010-09-30.

What specific technical assistance services are being provided, and how do they directly contribute to the Air Force's mission objectives?

The specific technical assistance services are not detailed in the provided data, only the NAICS code 541512 (Computer Systems Design Services). To assess value, understanding the scope of work is critical. These services likely support the operation, maintenance, or enhancement of IT systems essential for Air Force operations, such as command and control, intelligence, or logistics.

How is the 'award fee' component structured, and what are the key performance indicators (KPIs) that determine the fee amount?

The structure of the award fee and its associated KPIs are not detailed in the provided data. For a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract, the award fee is intended to incentivize contractor performance beyond basic requirements. Understanding the specific metrics and targets is crucial for evaluating whether the fee is justified and if it truly drives superior outcomes for the government.

What was the competitive landscape like for this 'full and open' solicitation, and were there any significant deviations from the initial solicitation requirements?

While the contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' the provided data does not detail the number of bids received or the specifics of the competitive process. Understanding the number of proposals submitted and the evaluation criteria would offer insight into the effectiveness of the competition. Any significant deviations from the solicitation could also impact the final price and value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Titan II Inc. (UEI: 016435559)

Address: 7575 COLSHIRE DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DCA20002D5010

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-10-14

Current End Date: 2010-09-30

Potential End Date: 2010-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-05-22

More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Information Technology Inc

View all Northrop Grumman Information Technology Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending