DOT Awards $3.7M for FAA Enroute Facilities Modernization, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Selected

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,710,000 ($3.7M)

Contractor: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2020-01-23

End Date: 2028-09-30

Contract Duration: 3,173 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Transportation

Official Description: ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES TO THE ENROUTE FACILITIES MODERNIZATION PROGRAM.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20591

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $3.7 million to JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. for work described as: ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES TO THE ENROUTE FACILITIES MODERNIZATION PROGRAM. Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. for Architecture and Engineering Services. 2. The contract supports the Federal Aviation Administration's Enroute Facilities Modernization Program. 3. This is a delivery order under a larger contract, indicating phased implementation. 4. The total value is $3.7 million, with an estimated duration of 3173 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.7 million for engineering services appears reasonable given the long duration and the nature of facility modernization. Benchmarking against similar large-scale infrastructure projects would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process that likely resulted in fair market pricing. The use of a delivery order implies a pre-negotiated rate structure.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for essential infrastructure upgrades.

Public Impact

Modernization of air traffic control facilities enhances safety and efficiency in the National Airspace System. Investment in infrastructure supports the long-term operational capabilities of the FAA. The project's success relies on effective project management and technical expertise from the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long contract duration could lead to scope creep or cost overruns if not managed tightly.
Reliance on a single contractor for delivery orders may limit flexibility in adapting to changing needs.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment.
Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Modernization of critical infrastructure is a positive step for national safety.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting the modernization of critical transportation infrastructure. Spending benchmarks for similar large-scale federal engineering projects vary widely based on scope and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses within this larger award.

Oversight & Accountability

The Federal Aviation Administration is responsible for overseeing this contract. Standard government oversight procedures for large engineering contracts, including performance reviews and financial audits, should be in place.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Transportation Contracting
Federal Aviation Administration Programs

Risk Flags

Long duration of the contract (over 8 years) increases potential for unforeseen issues.
Reliance on a single contractor for delivery orders may limit competitive pricing on future tasks.
Potential for scope creep if modernization needs evolve significantly over the contract period.
Lack of small business participation noted in the award data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $3.7 million to JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.. ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES TO THE ENROUTE FACILITIES MODERNIZATION PROGRAM.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-01-23. End: 2028-09-30.

What is the specific scope of the Enroute Facilities Modernization Program and how does this contract contribute to its overall goals?

The Enroute Facilities Modernization Program aims to upgrade and modernize the FAA's air traffic control infrastructure, including radar, communication, and navigation systems. This contract specifically provides architecture and engineering services, likely focusing on the design, planning, and technical oversight required for these complex upgrades. It contributes by ensuring the technical feasibility and effective implementation of modernization efforts.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this contract and the contractor's performance?

Key performance indicators would likely include adherence to project timelines, delivery of high-quality engineering designs and documentation, cost control within the awarded budget, and successful technical support throughout the modernization phases. The FAA would monitor these through regular progress reports, site inspections, and performance evaluations to ensure the project meets its objectives.

How does the firm fixed price contract structure mitigate risks associated with potential cost overruns in long-term infrastructure projects?

A firm fixed price contract shifts the primary cost risk to the contractor. While the government has price certainty, the contractor is incentivized to manage costs efficiently to maintain profitability. For long-term projects, this structure requires careful initial scope definition and robust change order management to prevent the contractor from bearing excessive risk or the government from facing unexpected cost increases.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - CONSTRUCTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1100 NORTH GLEBE RD STE 500, ARLINGTON, VA, 22201

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,710,000

Exercised Options: $3,710,000

Current Obligation: $3,710,000

Actual Outlays: $3,257,107

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 697DCK19D00002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline