DOT awards $15.6M for power supplies, with 2 bidders competing for a 90-day delivery order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,599 ($15.6K)

Contractor: CD & T Logistics Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2026-07-07

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $173/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PROCUREMENT OF POWER SUPPLIES TO SUPPORT UNIVERSAL MONITORING AND CONTROL (UMAC) PROGRAM.

Place of Performance

Location: SMITHVILLE, CLAY County, MISSOURI, 64089

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $15,599.25 to CD & T LOGISTICS INC for work described as: PROCUREMENT OF POWER SUPPLIES TO SUPPORT UNIVERSAL MONITORING AND CONTROL (UMAC) PROGRAM. Key points: 1. The contract value of $15.6 million for power supplies appears reasonable given the short delivery timeline. 2. Competition was present, with two bidders vying for this purchase order, suggesting some price discovery. 3. The fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 4. This procurement supports the Federal Aviation Administration's Universal Monitoring and Control (UMAC) Program. 5. The supplier, CD & T LOGISTICS INC, is a merchant wholesaler of electronic parts. 6. The contract duration is short, indicating a need for immediate supply. 7. The geographic focus is Missouri, where the order will be fulfilled. 8. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 423690 covers electronic parts wholesalers.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $15.6 million for 90 days of power supply delivery seems aligned with market expectations for specialized electronic components. While a direct per-unit cost comparison is not provided, the fixed-price nature of the award suggests the government secured a defined cost upfront. Benchmarking against similar procurements for the UMAC program or other FAA monitoring systems would provide further insight into value for money, but the limited duration and specific nature of the components suggest this is a fair price.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating a value below the threshold for full and open competition. With two bidders, there was some level of competition, which is generally positive for price discovery. However, the limited number of bidders suggests that the pool of qualified suppliers may be restricted or that the specific requirements of the purchase order narrowed the field. Further details on the solicitation process would clarify the extent of competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The presence of two bidders suggests a degree of competition that likely prevented the highest possible price. However, a more robust competition with more bidders could potentially have driven prices lower for taxpayers.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and its Universal Monitoring and Control (UMAC) Program. The services delivered involve the procurement of essential power supplies for critical monitoring systems. The geographic impact is centered in Missouri, where the supplier is located and presumably where the supplies will be shipped from. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily related to the logistics and delivery of the electronic components.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader electronics and parts wholesale sector, specifically serving government procurement needs. The market for specialized electronic components for aviation infrastructure is niche, often characterized by specific technical requirements and stringent quality controls. The Federal Aviation Administration is a significant buyer in this space, procuring a wide range of equipment to maintain and upgrade its air traffic control and monitoring systems. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other FAA procurements for similar electronic parts or power management solutions.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. The award went to CD & T LOGISTICS INC, which is categorized under 'Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers.' Further investigation into the size standard for this NAICS code and the company's actual size would be needed to fully assess its small business status and potential impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) contracting officers and program managers responsible for the UMAC program. As a purchase order under SAP, the oversight mechanisms might be less formalized than for larger, more complex contracts. Transparency is facilitated by public contract databases, but detailed performance monitoring and accountability measures are internal to the agency. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

transportation, federal-aviation-administration, purchase-order, missouri, firm-fixed-price, simplified-acquisition-procedures, electronic-parts, merchant-wholesaler, competed, 90-day-delivery

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $15,599.25 to CD & T LOGISTICS INC. PROCUREMENT OF POWER SUPPLIES TO SUPPORT UNIVERSAL MONITORING AND CONTROL (UMAC) PROGRAM.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CD & T LOGISTICS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15,599.25.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2026-07-07.

What is the track record of CD & T LOGISTICS INC with the Federal Aviation Administration or Department of Transportation?

Based on the provided data, CD & T LOGISTICS INC is the contractor for this specific purchase order. Without access to a broader contract database or historical procurement records, it is difficult to definitively assess their overall track record with the FAA or DOT. However, their classification as 'Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers' suggests they operate within a sector relevant to aviation infrastructure. Further analysis would require searching federal procurement databases for past awards to this contractor from these agencies to understand their performance history, contract types, and value of previous awards.

How does the $15.6 million value compare to similar power supply procurements for aviation systems?

Directly comparing the $15.6 million value for these power supplies is challenging without specific details on the quantity, technical specifications, and duration of need. However, given that this is for a 90-day delivery period and supports a critical program like UMAC, the amount appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized electronic components. Procurements for large-scale aviation infrastructure can range from thousands to millions of dollars depending on the scope. Benchmarking against other FAA procurements for similar electronic parts or power management solutions, especially those with short lead times, would provide a more precise valuation context.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks include potential supply chain disruptions, component obsolescence, or failure to meet stringent technical specifications within the short delivery window. Mitigation strategies are embedded in the contract structure and the nature of the award. The fixed-price nature of the contract shifts the financial risk of cost overruns to the contractor. The limited competition, while potentially impacting price, also means the FAA selected a known entity. The short 90-day delivery period suggests a focused need, reducing the risk of long-term obsolescence. The FAA's oversight and acceptance testing processes would further mitigate risks related to quality and performance.

How effective is the competition level (2 bidders) in ensuring value for taxpayers?

A competition level of two bidders, while better than a sole-source award, is generally considered limited. It suggests that there are likely more than two potential suppliers in the market, but perhaps the specific requirements, the value of the order, or the solicitation process limited the number of responsive bids. This level of competition provides some price discovery and encourages the bidders to offer competitive pricing to win the contract. However, it is less likely to drive prices down as aggressively as a scenario with five or more bidders. Therefore, while it offers some value, there may be room for improvement in maximizing taxpayer savings through broader competition.

What is the historical spending pattern for the UMAC program's power supply needs?

The provided data pertains to a single purchase order with an estimated completion date in July 2026. It does not offer historical spending patterns for the UMAC program's power supply needs. To determine historical spending, one would need to access procurement data for previous years, identifying contracts awarded for similar components under the UMAC program or related initiatives. Analyzing the frequency, value, and competition levels of past awards would reveal trends and inform whether this $15.6 million award represents an increase, decrease, or consistent level of spending for these types of supplies.

What are the implications of the 'Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers' classification for this procurement?

The classification of CD & T LOGISTICS INC as 'Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers' (NAICS 423690) indicates that the company's primary business is distributing electronic parts. This suggests they are likely sourcing and supplying components rather than manufacturing them directly. For this procurement, it implies the FAA is contracting with a distributor to obtain necessary power supplies. This can be efficient for acquiring a variety of parts, but it also means the final price includes a distributor's markup. The effectiveness relies on the wholesaler's ability to source reliable components at competitive prices and manage logistics efficiently within the specified timeframe.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Wholesale TradeHousehold Appliances and Electrical and Electronic Goods Merchant WholesalersOther Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers

Product/Service Code: HARDWARE AND ABRASIVES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1015 NE 194TH TER, SMITHVILLE, MO, 64089

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,599

Exercised Options: $15,599

Current Obligation: $15,599

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-08

Current End Date: 2026-07-07

Potential End Date: 2026-07-07 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-08

More Contracts from CD & T Logistics Inc

View all CD & T Logistics Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Transportation Contracts

View all Department of Transportation contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending