DOT awards $2.5M for FY26 maintenance and repairs to Pacific-Gulf Marine, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,522,000 ($2.5M)

Contractor: Pacific-Gulf Marine, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2026-01-07

End Date: 2026-11-30

Contract Duration: 327 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: Transportation

Official Description: CAPE KENNEDY-PACIFIC GULF MARINE-KENNEDY26-1005A-FISCAL YEAR 26 MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS-REPAIRS A IS ISSUED TO COMPLETE SPECIFIC WORKS IN THE APPROVED BUSINESS PLAN AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED SCOPE OF WORK.

Place of Performance

Location: NEW ORLEANS, ORLEANS County, LOUISIANA, 70146

State: Louisiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $2.5 million to PACIFIC-GULF MARINE, INC. for work described as: CAPE KENNEDY-PACIFIC GULF MARINE-KENNEDY26-1005A-FISCAL YEAR 26 MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS-REPAIRS A IS ISSUED TO COMPLETE SPECIFIC WORKS IN THE APPROVED BUSINESS PLAN AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED SCOPE OF WORK. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on specific repair works outlined in an approved business plan. 2. The contract type is a Delivery Order under a larger agreement. 3. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The contract duration is 327 days, aligning with the fiscal year. 5. The contractor, Pacific-Gulf Marine, Inc., is based in Louisiana. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 483111, related to Deep Sea Freight Transportation.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $2.52 million for maintenance and repairs appears reasonable for a 327-day duration. Without specific details on the scope of work or comparable contracts for similar deep-sea freight transportation maintenance, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the contract is a delivery order, implying it's part of a pre-established framework, which can sometimes lead to more predictable pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this method generally fosters price discovery and allows the government to select the most advantageous offer. The open competition suggests a healthy market for these types of services.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the best possible price for the required maintenance and repair services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the entities utilizing the deep-sea freight transportation services managed or supported by the Maritime Administration. The contract delivers essential maintenance and repair services to ensure the operational readiness of maritime assets. The geographic impact is centered around Louisiana, where the contractor is based, and potentially extends to the operational areas of the maritime assets being serviced. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for skilled labor in maintenance, repair, and maritime operations within Louisiana.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the Deep Sea Freight Transportation sector, a critical component of the U.S. economy. This sector involves the movement of goods via large vessels across oceans. Spending in this area is often driven by the need to maintain national security assets, support international trade, and ensure the efficient operation of the U.S. maritime fleet. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other maintenance and repair contracts for similar maritime assets or services within the Department of Transportation and other agencies like the Navy.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside provision. The focus remains on larger prime contractors capable of fulfilling the requirements under full and open competition.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Transportation's Maritime Administration. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract terms, including performance standards and delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed operational oversight specifics are not publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

transportation, maritime-administration, louisiana, delivery-order, maintenance-and-repairs, full-and-open-competition, deep-sea-freight-transportation, fiscal-year-26, cost-plus-fixed-fee

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $2.5 million to PACIFIC-GULF MARINE, INC.. CAPE KENNEDY-PACIFIC GULF MARINE-KENNEDY26-1005A-FISCAL YEAR 26 MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS-REPAIRS A IS ISSUED TO COMPLETE SPECIFIC WORKS IN THE APPROVED BUSINESS PLAN AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED SCOPE OF WORK.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PACIFIC-GULF MARINE, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Maritime Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-01-07. End: 2026-11-30.

What is the specific scope of work for the 'Repairs A' mentioned in the contract, and how does it align with the approved business plan?

The provided data indicates that 'Repairs A' is issued to complete specific works as shown on an attached scope of work. However, the actual scope of work document is not included in the provided data. To understand the specifics, one would need to access the full contract details, including any appendices or attachments. This scope of work would detail the exact nature of the maintenance and repairs required, such as hull cleaning, engine overhauls, structural reinforcements, or system upgrades. Its alignment with the approved business plan would be demonstrated by how these specific repair tasks contribute to the overall objectives outlined in that plan, whether it's extending the lifespan of an asset, improving operational efficiency, or meeting regulatory compliance standards.

How does the $2.52 million contract value compare to similar maintenance and repair contracts for deep-sea freight transportation assets?

A direct comparison of the $2.52 million contract value for maintenance and repairs requires access to a database of similar contracts awarded by the Maritime Administration or other relevant agencies. Factors influencing such comparisons include the type and size of the vessel or asset, the complexity of the required repairs, the duration of the contract, and the prevailing market rates for labor and materials. Without specific benchmarks, it's difficult to definitively state if this contract represents excellent, good, or fair value. However, given it's a delivery order under a larger agreement and awarded through full and open competition, it suggests an attempt to achieve competitive pricing. Further analysis would involve identifying comparable contracts for similar services, noting their values, durations, and the scope of work performed.

What is the track record of Pacific-Gulf Marine, Inc. in performing similar maintenance and repair services for the federal government?

The provided data does not include information on the track record of Pacific-Gulf Marine, Inc. To assess their performance history, one would need to consult federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) to review past contracts awarded to this company. Key aspects to examine would include contract values, durations, on-time delivery rates, quality of work, and any past performance evaluations or disputes. A strong track record with successful completion of similar maritime maintenance and repair projects would indicate a lower performance risk for this current contract. Conversely, a history of issues could raise concerns about the contractor's ability to meet the requirements effectively.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies might be in place?

Potential risks for this contract include scope creep (unforeseen additional work beyond the initial scope), delays in material procurement or labor availability, unforeseen technical challenges during repairs, and potential cost overruns if the contract type allows for them (though 'COST NO FEE' suggests a fixed price for the service itself, the underlying costs are borne by the contractor). Mitigation strategies could involve robust project management by the Maritime Administration, clear communication channels with Pacific-Gulf Marine, Inc., contingency planning for material and labor, and potentially performance bonds. The 'COST NO FEE' contract type itself implies the contractor assumes the risk of cost overruns in exchange for a fixed fee, which shifts some financial risk away from the government.

How does the 'Deep Sea Freight Transportation' NAICS code (483111) inform our understanding of the services being procured?

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 483111, 'Deep Sea Freight Transportation,' specifically categorizes establishments primarily engaged in operating and leasing deep-sea or coastal water freight transportation. This includes services like operating tugboats and tows in coastal and deep-sea waters, and operating barges on the ocean and coastwise. For this contract, it suggests that the maintenance and repairs are likely related to the infrastructure, vessels, or operational equipment used in the deep-sea freight transportation sector, potentially including ports, terminals, or the vessels themselves that are under the purview of the Maritime Administration.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Transportation and WarehousingDeep Sea, Coastal, and Great Lakes Water TransportationDeep Sea Freight Transportation

Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITYOPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 111 VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STE 740, METAIRIE, LA, 70005

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,522,000

Exercised Options: $2,522,000

Current Obligation: $2,522,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 693JF725D000036

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-01-07

Current End Date: 2026-11-30

Potential End Date: 2026-11-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-03

More Contracts from Pacific-Gulf Marine, Inc.

View all Pacific-Gulf Marine, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Transportation Contracts

View all Department of Transportation contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending