DOT FAA Awards $12.5M Engineering Services Contract to OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC for Enterprise Protocol Support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,476,046 ($12.5M)

Contractor: Oasis Systems, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2021-09-23

End Date: 2027-12-31

Contract Duration: 2,290 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: IAW THE ATTACHED SOW: THIS EFFORT ALSO PROVIDES SUPPORT FOR THE ENTERPRISE PROTOCOL AND EXCHANGE MODELS WITH TECHNICAL ANALYSIS SUPPORT, SYSTEM ENGINEERING SUPPORT, AND OTHER SUPPORT WITH RESPECT TO DETERMINING, DOCUMENTING, AND OVERSEEING AN ENTERP

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20500

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $12.5 million to OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC for work described as: IAW THE ATTACHED SOW: THIS EFFORT ALSO PROVIDES SUPPORT FOR THE ENTERPRISE PROTOCOL AND EXCHANGE MODELS WITH TECHNICAL ANALYSIS SUPPORT, SYSTEM ENGINEERING SUPPORT, AND OTHER SUPPORT WITH RESPECT TO DETERMINING, DOCUMENTING, AND OVERSEEING AN ENTERP Key points: 1. Contract focuses on enterprise protocol and exchange models, requiring technical and system engineering support. 2. OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC is the awardee under a full and open competition. 3. The contract duration is over 5 years, indicating a long-term need for these services. 4. The total value is substantial at $12.5 million, requiring careful oversight.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $12.5 million over 5 years appears reasonable for specialized engineering services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering support contracts would provide a clearer picture of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for essential engineering support.

Public Impact

Ensures continued development and maintenance of critical aviation enterprise protocols. Supports the Federal Aviation Administration's modernization efforts. Potential for improved system efficiency and reliability through expert analysis. Long-term commitment suggests a stable, ongoing requirement for these specialized skills.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Scope creep potential in long-term engineering support contracts.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical enterprise models.
Ensuring continued technical relevance over the contract duration.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition.
Long contract duration allows for sustained support.
Clear focus on essential enterprise protocol and exchange models.

Sector Analysis

Engineering services, particularly those involving complex systems like aviation protocols, are crucial for government operations. Spending in this sector is often driven by modernization needs and regulatory requirements.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses in this contract award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will be critical to ensure the contractor meets all technical requirements and stays within budget. The FAA's contracting office will be responsible for monitoring performance and deliverables.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Transportation Contracting
Federal Aviation Administration Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may lead to price escalation or obsolescence.
Potential for vendor lock-in if knowledge transfer is insufficient.
Complexity of enterprise models requires robust technical oversight.
Dependence on a single awardee for critical support functions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $12.5 million to OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC. IAW THE ATTACHED SOW: THIS EFFORT ALSO PROVIDES SUPPORT FOR THE ENTERPRISE PROTOCOL AND EXCHANGE MODELS WITH TECHNICAL ANALYSIS SUPPORT, SYSTEM ENGINEERING SUPPORT, AND OTHER SUPPORT WITH RESPECT TO DETERMINING, DOCUMENTING, AND OVERSEEING AN ENTERP

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-09-23. End: 2027-12-31.

How will the FAA ensure the technical analysis and system engineering support remain relevant and effective throughout the 5-year contract duration, given the rapid pace of technological change?

The FAA can ensure relevance by incorporating regular technical reviews, performance metrics tied to evolving industry standards, and clear change management processes into the contract. Periodic re-evaluation of the SOW against current and future technological needs will be essential. Contractor innovation and adaptation should be incentivized through performance evaluations and potential contract modifications.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC's support for enterprise protocol and exchange models?

Key performance indicators likely include the accuracy and completeness of technical analyses, the successful implementation of system engineering recommendations, adherence to project timelines, and the overall impact on the stability and efficiency of the enterprise protocol and exchange models. Feedback from system users and stakeholders would also be a crucial measure.

Beyond the initial award, what mechanisms are in place to assess the ongoing value and cost-effectiveness of this contract for taxpayers?

Ongoing value assessment can be achieved through regular performance reviews comparing delivered outcomes against contract objectives, benchmarking against industry standards for similar services, and analyzing cost trends over the contract's life. Independent technical reviews and post-award audits can further validate cost-effectiveness and ensure taxpayer funds are utilized efficiently.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 200 SUMMIT DR, BURLINGTON, MA, 01803

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,408,782

Exercised Options: $12,476,046

Current Obligation: $12,476,046

Actual Outlays: $9,534,429

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 693KA921D00004

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline