Transportation contract for freight services awarded to Keystone Shipping Services, Inc. for over $3 million
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $3,097,181 ($3.1M)
Contractor: Keystone Shipping Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation
Start Date: 2024-07-27
End Date: 2025-08-17
Contract Duration: 386 days
Daily Burn Rate: $8.0K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Transportation
Official Description: CAPE RISE FY 24 FIXED FEES KEY-RIS24-1002 B BRIDGE FIXED FEES
Place of Performance
Location: PORTSMOUTH, PORTSMOUTH CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23707
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Transportation obligated $3.1 million to KEYSTONE SHIPPING SERVICES, INC. for work described as: CAPE RISE FY 24 FIXED FEES KEY-RIS24-1002 B BRIDGE FIXED FEES Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a firm fixed-price basis, indicating clear cost expectations. 2. The contract duration is over a year, suggesting a need for sustained services. 3. Awarded as a delivery order under a larger contract, potentially indicating pre-negotiated terms. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 483111 points to deep sea freight transportation. 5. The contract is not a small business set-aside, with no explicit subcontracting noted. 6. The contracting agency is the Maritime Administration within the Department of Transportation.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total value of this delivery order is approximately $3.1 million. Without comparative data on similar deep sea freight transportation contracts or specific service details, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty, but the absence of competition makes it difficult to benchmark pricing against market rates. Further analysis would require understanding the scope of services and comparing it to industry benchmarks for similar transportation needs.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded as 'NOT COMPETED,' indicating a sole-source or limited competition procurement. This means that only one vendor, Keystone Shipping Services, Inc., was solicited or considered for this specific delivery order. The lack of competition limits the government's ability to explore alternative providers and potentially secure more favorable pricing or terms through a competitive bidding process.
Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition means taxpayers may not be benefiting from the potentially lower prices that could arise from a competitive bidding environment. This could lead to higher overall costs for the government.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are likely the entities requiring deep sea freight transportation services managed by the Maritime Administration. The contract facilitates the delivery of essential freight transportation services. The geographic impact is primarily related to the routes covered by deep sea freight transportation. Workforce implications may include employment opportunities within Keystone Shipping Services, Inc. and related logistics sectors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and reduced value for taxpayer funds.
- Limited transparency into the justification for a sole-source award.
- Absence of performance metrics or specific deliverables makes it difficult to assess service quality.
- The contract's fixed-price nature, while providing cost certainty, might not incentivize efficiency if the price is not market-based.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- The contract is a delivery order, suggesting it may be part of a larger, potentially established framework.
- The duration of the contract (over a year) indicates a sustained need for the services provided.
Sector Analysis
The deep sea freight transportation sector is a critical component of global commerce, involving the movement of goods across oceans. This contract, under NAICS code 483111, falls within this vital industry. The Maritime Administration's role often involves ensuring the availability of shipping capacity for national security and economic purposes. Benchmarking this contract's value would require comparing its terms and pricing against other government or commercial contracts for similar long-haul freight services, considering factors like cargo type, volume, and route.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary contractor, Keystone Shipping Services, Inc., is likely a larger entity, and the contract does not appear to be structured to specifically benefit the small business ecosystem in this sector.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Maritime Administration's program management and the Department of Transportation's Inspector General. Accountability measures would be tied to the contract's terms and conditions, including delivery schedules and service requirements. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award, with the justification for not competing the contract being a key area for scrutiny.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Transportation - General Services
- Maritime Administration - Operating Programs
- Federal Supply Schedule - Transportation Services
- Defense Logistics Agency - Transportation Services
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award without clear justification
- Potential for uncompetitive pricing
- Lack of transparency in procurement process
Tags
transportation, maritime-administration, department-of-transportation, freight-transportation, deep-sea-shipping, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, not-competed, sole-source, virginia, large-business
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Transportation awarded $3.1 million to KEYSTONE SHIPPING SERVICES, INC.. CAPE RISE FY 24 FIXED FEES KEY-RIS24-1002 B BRIDGE FIXED FEES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KEYSTONE SHIPPING SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Maritime Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $3.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-07-27. End: 2025-08-17.
What is the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?
The provided data indicates the contract was awarded as 'NOT COMPETED,' which signifies a sole-source or limited competition procurement. A detailed justification for this decision would typically be documented by the contracting agency, the Maritime Administration. Common reasons for sole-source awards include the existence of only one responsible source capable of providing the required services, urgent and compelling needs that preclude full and open competition, or specific national security requirements. Without access to the contract's justification documentation, the precise reason remains unknown. This lack of competition limits the government's ability to explore alternative vendors and potentially achieve better pricing or terms.
How does the firm fixed-price (FFP) structure impact risk allocation in this contract?
A Firm Fixed-Price (FFP) contract, like the one awarded to Keystone Shipping Services, Inc., places the majority of the cost risk on the contractor. This means that the contractor is obligated to complete the work for the agreed-upon price, regardless of their actual costs. If Keystone Shipping Services, Inc. incurs higher expenses than anticipated during the contract period, their profit margin will decrease. Conversely, if they manage their costs efficiently, their profit will increase. For the government, the primary benefit of an FFP contract is cost certainty; the total price is known upfront. However, this certainty comes at the potential cost of not benefiting from any cost savings the contractor might achieve, and if the initial price was not well-benchmarked due to lack of competition, the government might overpay.
What are the potential implications of this contract being a delivery order under a larger contract?
This contract is a delivery order, which implies it is a task or order issued under a previously awarded indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) or other type of basic contract. This structure suggests that the foundational terms, conditions, and potentially pricing mechanisms were established during the initial award of the parent contract. The implications are that the competition, if any, for the parent contract may have occurred earlier. For this specific delivery order, the 'NOT COMPETED' status indicates that even within the framework of the parent contract, this particular order was not competed. This could be due to specific requirements of the order, urgency, or the nature of the services. It streamlines the process for issuing orders but can reduce price discovery for individual tasks if not managed carefully.
What is the typical market size and competitive landscape for deep sea freight transportation services?
The deep sea freight transportation market is a global, highly competitive industry dominated by large international shipping lines. Market size is substantial, measured in trillions of dollars annually for global trade. Competition is intense, driven by factors such as vessel capacity, route efficiency, service reliability, and pricing. However, for government contracts, especially those requiring specific capabilities or security clearances, the pool of eligible contractors can be smaller. The Maritime Administration often plays a role in ensuring the availability of U.S.-flagged vessels or specific types of shipping capacity, which can influence the competitive landscape for their procurements. The 'NOT COMPETED' status here suggests that for this particular requirement, Keystone Shipping Services, Inc. was deemed the sole or most appropriate provider.
Are there any historical spending patterns with Keystone Shipping Services, Inc. by the Maritime Administration or Department of Transportation?
To assess historical spending patterns with Keystone Shipping Services, Inc., a review of federal procurement databases (such as USASpending.gov or FPDS) would be necessary. This would involve searching for all contracts awarded to this specific entity by the Maritime Administration and the Department of Transportation. Analyzing past awards would reveal the frequency, value, and types of services previously procured from this contractor. Understanding their track record, including performance history and any issues encountered on prior contracts, is crucial for evaluating the current award's risk and value. Without this historical data, it's difficult to determine if this $3.1 million contract represents a significant increase or continuation of established business.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Deep Sea, Coastal, and Great Lakes Water Transportation › Deep Sea Freight Transportation
Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1 BALA PLZ STE 600, BALA CYNWYD, PA, 19004
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $3,097,181
Exercised Options: $3,097,181
Current Obligation: $3,097,181
Actual Outlays: $3,097,181
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 693JF724D000010
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-07-27
Current End Date: 2025-08-17
Potential End Date: 2025-08-17 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-11
More Contracts from Keystone Shipping Services, Inc.
- Cape Race FY 24 Drydock Key-Rac24-1006a — $19.7M (Department of Transportation)
- Cape Rise FY 24 Drydock Key-Ris24-1006a — $18.4M (Department of Transportation)
- Fisher Fiscal Year (FY) Repairs a the Purpose of This Project IS to Accomplish Approved Specific Work Items on the Ship's Approved Business Plan — $6.9M (Department of Transportation)
- Brittin Fiscal Year (FY) 26 Repairs a the Purpose of This Project IS to Accomplish Approved Specific Work Items on the Ship's Approved Business Plan — $5.5M (Department of Transportation)
- Fisher Fiscal Year (FY) 25 Repairs a the Purpose of This Project IS to Accomplish Approved Specific Work Items on the Ship's Approved Business Plan — $4.6M (Department of Transportation)
View all Keystone Shipping Services, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Transportation Contracts
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $3.8B (Lockheed Martin Services, LLC)
- THE Purpose of This Delivery Order Award IS to ADD Funding for FTI Telecommunications Services — $1.9B (Harris Corporation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Leidos, Inc.)
- Center for Advanced Aviation Development (caasd) Ffrdc Mitre — $1.7B (THE Mitre Corporation)
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $1.5B (Harris Corporation)