DOT awards $1.58M for FTA safety oversight and compliance support to KBR Wyle Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $157,509 ($157.5K)

Contractor: KBR Wyle Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2025-09-23

End Date: 2026-09-10

Contract Duration: 352 days

Daily Burn Rate: $447/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: MISSION INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT (MITS) SUPPORT SERVICES / FTA OFFICE OF SAFETY OVERSIGHT AND COMPLIANCE PROGRAM SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: CAMBRIDGE, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02142

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $157,509.14 to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC for work described as: MISSION INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT (MITS) SUPPORT SERVICES / FTA OFFICE OF SAFETY OVERSIGHT AND COMPLIANCE PROGRAM SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract value represents a moderate investment in critical safety oversight functions. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding process for this service. 3. Performance period extends over a year, indicating a need for sustained support. 4. The contract falls within engineering services, aligning with technical support needs. 5. This award is part of broader Department of Transportation efforts to ensure safety compliance.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $1.58 million for approximately 1.3 years of support appears reasonable for specialized mission IT and safety oversight services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for IT support and program management within federal agencies suggests this is within a typical range. The use of labor hours allows for flexibility in resource allocation, which can be cost-effective if managed efficiently. However, without detailed task breakdowns and labor rates, a precise value-for-money assessment is limited.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, driving down prices and encouraging innovation. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition was intended and likely achieved, leading to a fair market price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the best value for services, preventing potential overpricing that could occur with less competitive solicitations.

Public Impact

The Federal Transit Administration's Office of Safety Oversight and Compliance Program benefits from enhanced support services. Improved oversight and compliance support contribute to the safety of public transportation systems nationwide. The contract supports the delivery of essential safety assurance functions within the FTA. Workforce implications include the potential for skilled IT and program support personnel to be engaged in critical safety initiatives.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined and managed.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical safety support could pose a risk if performance falters.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing structure.
Contract duration allows for continuity of essential safety oversight functions.
KBR Wyle Services, LLC has a track record with government contracts, implying familiarity with federal requirements.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting IT and program management functions for safety oversight. The federal IT services market is substantial, with agencies consistently investing in technology to support mission-critical operations. This contract represents a small but vital component of the Department of Transportation's overall IT and safety spending, contributing to the effective functioning of the FTA's safety programs.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate any specific small business set-aside. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through this specific award is likely minimal unless KBR Wyle Services, LLC engages them as subcontractors. Further analysis of subcontracting plans would be needed to assess the broader impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the FTA's Office of Safety Oversight and Compliance. The Department of Transportation has established procurement regulations and oversight mechanisms to ensure contract compliance and performance. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Federal Transit Administration Safety Programs
Department of Transportation IT Support Services
Mission Information Technology Support Contracts
Program Support Services

Risk Flags

Performance Risk
Technical Risk
Scope Management Risk

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $157,509.14 to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC. MISSION INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT (MITS) SUPPORT SERVICES / FTA OFFICE OF SAFETY OVERSIGHT AND COMPLIANCE PROGRAM SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Immediate Office of the Secretary of Transportation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $157,509.14.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-23. End: 2026-09-10.

What is KBR Wyle Services, LLC's past performance record with the Department of Transportation and similar agencies?

KBR Wyle Services, LLC has a significant history of performing contracts for various U.S. government agencies, including the Department of Defense and NASA, often in areas related to engineering, IT, and technical support. Their performance with the Department of Transportation, while not detailed here, would typically be assessed during the procurement process. Agencies evaluate past performance based on factors like quality of work, timeliness of delivery, cost control, and customer satisfaction. A review of their contract history and performance evaluations within federal procurement databases would provide a more granular understanding of their track record, particularly concerning mission IT support and program compliance services.

How does the awarded amount compare to historical spending on similar FTA safety oversight support services?

The awarded amount of $1.58 million for approximately 1.3 years of support needs to be contextualized against historical spending patterns for similar FTA safety oversight and compliance program support. Without specific historical data for this exact service category, a direct comparison is challenging. However, federal IT and program support contracts can range widely in cost depending on scope, duration, and complexity. If previous contracts for similar functions were significantly higher or lower, it could indicate changes in market rates, scope adjustments, or differences in competition levels. Analyzing trends in FTA's IT and safety program budgets over the past several years would provide a better benchmark for assessing whether this award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will they be measured?

Key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, focused on Mission Information Technology Support (MITS) and FTA Office of Safety Oversight and Compliance Program Support, would typically revolve around the reliability and availability of IT systems, responsiveness to user requests, successful implementation of software updates or new functionalities, and the effectiveness of support provided to the safety compliance program. Measurement methods often include help desk ticket resolution times, system uptime percentages, user satisfaction surveys, and successful completion of program-specific milestones. The contracting officer's representative (COR) is responsible for monitoring these KPIs against the contract's performance standards, which are detailed in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS).

What specific IT systems or platforms will KBR Wyle Services, LLC be supporting under this contract?

The contract description 'MISSION INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT (MITS) SUPPORT SERVICES / FTA OFFICE OF SAFETY OVERSIGHT AND COMPLIANCE PROGRAM SUPPORT' suggests that KBR Wyle Services, LLC will be providing technical support for the IT infrastructure and applications used by the FTA's Office of Safety Oversight and Compliance. This could encompass a range of systems, including databases for tracking safety incidents, software for analyzing compliance data, communication platforms, network infrastructure, and potentially custom-developed applications designed to manage and monitor transit safety regulations. The specific systems would be detailed in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) of the contract, outlining the scope of support required, such as system maintenance, troubleshooting, user support, and potentially system upgrades or enhancements.

Are there any identified risks associated with KBR Wyle Services, LLC's performance or the nature of the services provided?

Potential risks associated with this contract include the standard risks inherent in IT support and program management services. These could involve the potential for service disruptions if IT systems fail, delays in critical safety compliance reporting or analysis due to technical issues, or challenges in adapting to evolving safety regulations and technology requirements. Furthermore, reliance on a single contractor for essential support functions introduces a performance risk; any degradation in service quality from KBR Wyle Services, LLC could directly impact the FTA's ability to effectively oversee safety. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust performance monitoring, clear service level agreements (SLAs), and contingency planning.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: KBR, Inc.

Address: 8120 MAPLE LAWN BLVD, FULTON, MD, 20759

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $229,921

Exercised Options: $223,835

Current Obligation: $157,509

Actual Outlays: $44,481

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 6913G621D300001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline