Transportation contract for engineering services awarded to NWI&T ATKINS SB JV, LLC for over $2.4M
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,487,287 ($2.5M)
Contractor: Nwi&t Atkins SB JV, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation
Start Date: 2023-03-08
End Date: 2026-11-29
Contract Duration: 1,362 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: ID FS ERFO 2017(1)-29(1), STODDARD BRIDGE CI-II AND CPE SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: SALMON, LEMHI County, IDAHO, 83467
State: Idaho Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Transportation obligated $2.5 million to NWI&T ATKINS SB JV, LLC for work described as: ID FS ERFO 2017(1)-29(1), STODDARD BRIDGE CI-II AND CPE SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded for engineering services related to bridge construction and maintenance. 2. The contract duration is over three years, indicating a significant project scope. 3. Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 5. The contractor is a joint venture, potentially indicating a specialized or large-scale capability. 6. The contract falls under engineering services, a critical sector for infrastructure development.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $2.49 million for engineering services over a 3-year period appears reasonable given the scope of bridge construction and maintenance. Benchmarking against similar contracts for large-scale infrastructure projects would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure suggests that the government has negotiated a set price, which can be advantageous if the contractor manages costs effectively. However, without detailed cost breakdowns or comparisons to industry standards for specific engineering tasks, a definitive value assessment is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The fact that it was competed openly suggests a healthy level of market interest and potential for competitive pricing. The number of bidders is not specified, but open competition generally leads to better price discovery and a wider selection of qualified contractors.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from open competition through potentially lower prices and access to a broader range of innovative solutions. It ensures that the government is not limited to a single provider, fostering a more efficient use of public funds.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration, ensuring the upkeep and development of critical transportation infrastructure. Services delivered include engineering expertise for bridge construction and maintenance, vital for public safety and economic activity. The geographic impact is focused on Idaho, where the project is located, supporting regional infrastructure development. The contract supports specialized engineering jobs within the construction and engineering sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if the firm fixed-price contract does not adequately account for unforeseen complexities in bridge construction.
- Dependence on a single joint venture contractor for a critical infrastructure project.
- Risk of schedule delays impacting the timely completion of essential transportation upgrades.
Positive Signals
- The firm fixed-price contract structure incentivizes contractor efficiency and cost control.
- Award through full and open competition suggests a robust selection process and potential for high-quality service.
- The multi-year duration allows for sustained focus and expertise on the project.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a crucial component of the broader Construction and Infrastructure industry. The market for engineering services supporting federal transportation projects is substantial, driven by ongoing needs for maintenance, repair, and expansion of the nation's roadways and bridges. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the average cost of similar engineering contracts awarded by the Federal Highway Administration or state Departments of Transportation for projects of comparable scale and complexity.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded to NWI&T ATKINS SB JV, LLC, a joint venture. While the 'SB' in the name might suggest Small Business involvement, the data indicates the contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses within this joint venture, which could still provide some benefit to the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and payment schedules tied to deliverables. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Highway Administration Bridge Program
- Department of Transportation Infrastructure Grants
- National Highway System Projects
- Engineering and Architectural Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns under Firm Fixed Price
- Contractor performance history not detailed
- Limited information on number of bidders
Tags
transportation, engineering-services, federal-highway-administration, idaho, delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, construction, infrastructure, joint-venture
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Transportation awarded $2.5 million to NWI&T ATKINS SB JV, LLC. ID FS ERFO 2017(1)-29(1), STODDARD BRIDGE CI-II AND CPE SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NWI&T ATKINS SB JV, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Highway Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-03-08. End: 2026-11-29.
What is the track record of NWI&T ATKINS SB JV, LLC in performing similar federal contracts?
A detailed review of NWI&T ATKINS SB JV, LLC's past performance on federal contracts would be necessary to assess their track record. This would involve examining contract databases for previous awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any history of disputes or contract terminations. Understanding their experience with projects of similar size, scope, and complexity, particularly within the Department of Transportation or for bridge construction and maintenance, is crucial for evaluating their capability to successfully execute this current contract.
How does the awarded amount compare to the average cost of similar engineering services contracts for bridge projects?
To benchmark the value, we would compare the $2.49 million contract value against historical data for similar engineering services contracts awarded by the Federal Highway Administration or state Departments of Transportation for bridge construction and maintenance. Key comparison points include the contract duration (1362 days), the specific engineering disciplines required, and the geographic region. If data indicates that similar projects typically cost significantly more or less, it would suggest whether this contract represents excellent value, is priced competitively, or warrants further scrutiny regarding its cost-effectiveness.
What are the primary risks associated with this firm fixed-price contract for bridge engineering services?
The primary risks with a firm fixed-price (FFP) contract, especially for complex projects like bridge engineering, revolve around potential cost overruns for the contractor and subsequent impacts on project quality or schedule. If the contractor underestimates the scope, complexity, or unforeseen issues (e.g., subsurface conditions, material price fluctuations), they may cut corners to maintain profitability, potentially affecting the quality of engineering designs. Conversely, if the price is too high due to a lack of robust competition, the government may overpay. Schedule delays are also a risk if the contractor struggles with resource allocation or project management under the FFP constraint.
How effective is the 'full and open competition' process in ensuring competitive pricing for this type of engineering service?
The 'full and open competition' process is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring competitive pricing, as it allows any responsible source to submit an offer. This broad participation increases the likelihood of receiving multiple bids, which drives down prices as contractors compete against each other. For specialized engineering services like those required for bridge projects, the effectiveness depends on the number of qualified firms in the market and the clarity of the solicitation requirements. A well-defined solicitation can attract a sufficient number of bidders, leading to price discovery and potentially significant savings for the government compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.
What is the historical spending trend for engineering services contracts by the Federal Highway Administration in Idaho?
Analyzing historical spending trends for engineering services contracts by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) specifically within Idaho would provide context for this $2.49 million award. This involves examining FHWA's contract data over several fiscal years to identify patterns in contract values, types of services procured, and the number of contracts awarded. Understanding whether this award represents an increase, decrease, or is consistent with past spending levels can indicate shifts in program priorities, infrastructure investment strategies, or market conditions within the state. It also helps in assessing if the current procurement aligns with long-term federal and state infrastructure goals.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1425 HIGHAM ST, IDAHO FALLS, ID, 83402
Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,487,287
Exercised Options: $2,487,287
Current Obligation: $2,487,287
Actual Outlays: $1,461,709
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 69056721D000001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-03-08
Current End Date: 2026-11-29
Potential End Date: 2026-11-29 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-25
Other Department of Transportation Contracts
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $3.8B (Lockheed Martin Services, LLC)
- THE Purpose of This Delivery Order Award IS to ADD Funding for FTI Telecommunications Services — $1.9B (Harris Corporation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Leidos, Inc.)
- Center for Advanced Aviation Development (caasd) Ffrdc Mitre — $1.7B (THE Mitre Corporation)
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $1.5B (Harris Corporation)