DoD's $14.7M Computer Systems Design Contract with Indus Corporation Raises Questions on Value and Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,673,446 ($14.7M)

Contractor: Indus Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-12-01

End Date: 2011-11-14

Contract Duration: 1,078 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: FUNDING

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22204

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.7 million to INDUS CORPORATION for work described as: FUNDING Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Indus Corporation for computer systems design services totals $14.7 million. 2. Competition was listed as 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', suggesting potential limitations. 3. The contract type is 'Time and Materials', which can pose risks for cost control. 4. The sector is IT, specifically computer systems design services, a critical area for defense operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's Time and Materials pricing structure, combined with a lack of clear benchmarks, makes assessing value difficult. Without detailed cost breakdowns or comparisons to similar services, it's hard to determine if $14.7 million represents a fair price.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The competition method 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' is unusual and implies that certain sources were excluded, potentially limiting price discovery and competition. This raises concerns about whether the best possible price was achieved.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition and Time and Materials pricing structure may lead to higher costs for taxpayers than a more open and fixed-price contract.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying due to limited competition and a flexible pricing model. The effectiveness of the computer systems design services provided is not explicitly detailed, impacting public understanding of the investment. Lack of transparency in the procurement process could erode public trust in defense spending.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically computer systems design services. Spending in this area is crucial for modern defense capabilities, but also prone to cost overruns if not managed carefully.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. This represents a missed opportunity for small business participation in defense contracting.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'Exclusion of Sources' clause warrants further investigation to ensure proper justification and adherence to procurement regulations. Oversight should focus on the justification for excluding sources and the cost controls within the Time and Materials contract.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

computer-systems-design-services, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.7 million to INDUS CORPORATION. FUNDING

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INDUS CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-12-01. End: 2011-11-14.

What was the specific justification for excluding certain sources from this 'Full and Open Competition'?

The justification for excluding sources in a 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' scenario typically requires a detailed rationale, such as specific technical requirements that only certain vendors can meet, or national security concerns. Without this documented justification, the exclusion raises concerns about fairness and potential favoritism in the procurement process.

How was the 'Time and Materials' pricing structured to ensure cost efficiency for the government?

Time and Materials contracts are inherently less predictable in cost than fixed-price contracts. To ensure efficiency, the government should have implemented strict labor hour tracking, defined ceiling prices, and potentially incorporated incentives for cost savings. Regular audits and performance reviews would be crucial to monitor expenditures and prevent cost creep.

What metrics were used to evaluate the effectiveness and success of the computer systems design services provided?

Effectiveness metrics for computer systems design services could include system uptime, performance improvements, successful integration of new technologies, user satisfaction, and adherence to project timelines and budgets. The absence of readily available data on these metrics makes it difficult to assess the return on the $14.7 million investment and the overall success of the contract.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation ID: DCA10003R4019

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Contractor Details

Address: 1951 KIDWELL DR STE 800, VIENNA, VA, 22182

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,840,059

Exercised Options: $16,119,193

Current Obligation: $14,673,446

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DCA10003D4007

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-12-01

Current End Date: 2011-11-14

Potential End Date: 2011-11-14 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-04-07

More Contracts from Indus Corporation

View all Indus Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending