SEC awards $680M contract for expert witness services to CRA International, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $680,460 ($680.5K)

Contractor: CRA International, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission

Start Date: 2026-02-27

End Date: 2031-02-25

Contract Duration: 1,824 days

Daily Burn Rate: $373/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: EXPERT WITNESS SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: BOSTON, SUFFOLK County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02116

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Securities and Exchange Commission obligated $680,460 to CRA INTERNATIONAL, INC. for work described as: EXPERT WITNESS SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, raising questions about potential cost savings through competition. 2. The contract duration of approximately five years suggests a long-term need for these specialized services. 3. Services are categorized under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting, indicating a broad scope. 4. The time and materials pricing structure may lead to cost overruns if not closely managed. 5. No small business set-aside was utilized, potentially limiting opportunities for smaller firms in this sector. 6. The contract's value is substantial, reflecting the critical nature of expert witness testimony in SEC proceedings.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging due to the specialized nature of expert witness services and the sole-source award. However, the significant duration and total value suggest a high demand for these services. Without competitive bidding, it is difficult to ascertain if the pricing reflects optimal market value or if taxpayers are receiving the best possible deal. The time and materials (T&M) pricing model, while flexible, carries inherent risks of cost escalation if not meticulously monitored and controlled by the agency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This approach is typically used when a specific contractor possesses unique qualifications or capabilities essential for the requirement, or in cases of urgency or limited availability. The absence of competition means that price discovery through market forces was bypassed, potentially leading to higher costs than if multiple bids had been solicited and evaluated.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can result in higher costs for taxpayers as there is no competitive pressure to drive down prices. This limits the government's ability to secure the most cost-effective solution.

Public Impact

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) benefits directly by securing essential expert witness services for its legal and enforcement activities. These services are crucial for providing specialized testimony and analysis in complex financial and securities litigation. The geographic impact is national, as SEC cases can originate from or affect markets across the United States. The contract supports a workforce of highly specialized consultants and experts within CRA International, Inc.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The market for expert witness services, particularly within the financial and securities sector, is highly specialized. It involves individuals and firms with deep knowledge in areas such as accounting, finance, economics, and industry-specific practices. These services are critical for regulatory bodies like the SEC to build strong cases and provide expert testimony in complex litigation. The total addressable market for such services is significant, driven by the volume and complexity of regulatory enforcement actions and private litigation.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in providing these specialized expert witness services are limited under this specific award. The absence of a small business focus could mean that the SEC is relying on the unique capabilities of a large, established firm, potentially overlooking innovative solutions or cost efficiencies that smaller, specialized firms might offer.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight of this contract will primarily fall under the Securities and Exchange Commission's contracting and legal departments. Given the sole-source nature and the time-and-materials pricing, robust monitoring of hours, rates, and the necessity of services rendered will be crucial. Transparency regarding the specific tasks performed and the justification for expert engagement will be key accountability measures. While no specific Inspector General jurisdiction is mentioned, the SEC's Office of Inspector General could potentially audit such significant expenditures.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

consulting-services, expert-witness, securities-and-exchange-commission, administrative-management, general-management, sole-source, time-and-materials, definitive-contract, federal-agency, legal-support, financial-services, massachusetts

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Securities and Exchange Commission awarded $680,460 to CRA INTERNATIONAL, INC.. EXPERT WITNESS SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CRA INTERNATIONAL, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Securities and Exchange Commission (Securities and Exchange Commission).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $680,460.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-02-27. End: 2031-02-25.

What is CRA International, Inc.'s track record with the SEC and other federal agencies for similar services?

CRA International, Inc. has a significant history of contracting with federal agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), for a range of consulting and expert services. Their work often involves providing economic, financial, and management consulting, including expert testimony in litigation and regulatory proceedings. Analyzing past performance data, including contract values, durations, and any reported issues or successes, would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and effectiveness. For instance, reviewing past SEC contracts with CRA could reveal patterns in service delivery, cost management, and overall satisfaction, helping to contextualize the current $680 million award.

How does the $680 million value compare to historical SEC spending on expert witness services?

The $680 million value for expert witness services represents a substantial investment by the SEC. To benchmark this figure, one would need to examine historical spending patterns for similar services over preceding years. This analysis should consider the number of contracts awarded, the average contract value, and the total annual expenditure on expert witnesses. If this $680 million award is significantly higher than previous years' spending, it could indicate an increase in litigation complexity, a rise in the cost of specialized expertise, or a shift in the SEC's strategy for utilizing external experts. Conversely, if it aligns with or is lower than historical trends adjusted for inflation, it might suggest a consistent reliance on these services.

What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source, time-and-materials contract for expert witness services?

The primary risks associated with a sole-source, time-and-materials (T&M) contract for expert witness services are twofold. Firstly, the sole-source nature eliminates competitive pressure, potentially leading to inflated pricing as the contractor faces no direct market comparison. This lack of competition can obscure whether the government is obtaining the best value. Secondly, the T&M pricing model, while offering flexibility, carries a significant risk of cost overruns. Without rigorous oversight and clear task definitions, the contractor could incur substantial hours, driving up the total cost beyond initial projections. This necessitates meticulous monitoring of labor hours, rates, and the necessity of each task performed to mitigate financial exposure for the government.

How effective are expert witnesses in supporting the SEC's enforcement and litigation outcomes?

Expert witnesses play a critical role in supporting the SEC's enforcement and litigation outcomes by providing specialized knowledge and analysis that may be beyond the expertise of agency staff. They can clarify complex financial transactions, economic principles, or industry practices for judges, juries, and opposing counsel. The effectiveness of expert witnesses is often measured by their ability to present clear, credible testimony that strengthens the SEC's case, influences legal decisions, and potentially leads to successful settlements or judgments. The SEC's substantial investment in these services suggests a high perceived value placed on their contribution to achieving favorable outcomes in complex securities cases.

What is the typical duration and value range for SEC contracts providing expert witness services?

The typical duration and value range for SEC contracts providing expert witness services can vary significantly based on the complexity and anticipated length of the legal cases they support. Contracts can range from short-term engagements for specific case needs to multi-year agreements covering a portfolio of litigation. Values can range from tens of thousands to millions of dollars, depending on the scope of work, the seniority and specialization of the experts required, and the anticipated number of billable hours. The current five-year contract valued at $680 million appears to be on the higher end of both duration and value, suggesting a broad and long-term requirement for these specialized services.

Are there alternative procurement methods that could have been used to secure these expert witness services?

While this contract was awarded sole-source, alternative procurement methods could potentially have been explored, depending on the specific circumstances and justifications for the sole-source award. If the SEC had identified a need that could be met by multiple qualified firms, a competitive process such as a Request for Proposal (RFP) under full and open competition or a streamlined process using pre-qualified vendor pools could have been considered. Even in specialized fields, agencies can sometimes utilize broad agency announcements or other mechanisms to solicit innovative approaches or identify multiple sources. The justification for sole-source procurement typically requires demonstrating that only one responsible source can satisfy the agency's needs, which would need to be rigorously documented.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 200 CLARENDON STREET, T-9, BOSTON, MA, 02116

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $680,460

Exercised Options: $680,460

Current Obligation: $680,460

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-02-27

Current End Date: 2031-02-25

Potential End Date: 2031-02-25 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-07

More Contracts from CRA International, Inc.

View all CRA International, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Securities and Exchange Commission Contracts

View all Securities and Exchange Commission contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending