Pacific Tech Construction awarded $2.46M for JBLM roofing, highlighting potential value in fixed-price contracts

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,456,207 ($2.5M)

Contractor: Pacific Tech Construction Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2024-11-21

End Date: 2026-07-01

Contract Duration: 587 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: BPA CALL ORDER 0083 FOR JBLM RR ROOF 1SFG BTLN HQS 9934

Place of Performance

Location: KELSO, COWLITZ County, WASHINGTON, 98626

State: Washington Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2.5 million to PACIFIC TECH CONSTRUCTION INC for work described as: BPA CALL ORDER 0083 FOR JBLM RR ROOF 1SFG BTLN HQS 9934 Key points: 1. Contract awarded using full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. Fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty for the government. 3. The contract duration of nearly two years indicates a significant scope of work. 4. Awarded by GSA, a common agency for facility-related procurements. 5. The contract is for roofing services, a critical infrastructure maintenance need. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized, indicating a focus on broader market participation.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's firm fixed-price nature provides a degree of cost predictability. Benchmarking against similar roofing projects for military installations would be necessary for a definitive value assessment. However, the competitive award process suggests that the pricing is likely aligned with market rates. The total award amount of $2.46 million for a nearly two-year project for headquarters facilities appears reasonable within the context of construction and maintenance services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The open competition suggests that the agency sought the best value from the widest possible pool of qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for cost savings through a robust bidding process.

Public Impact

Military personnel at JBLM will benefit from improved and secure roofing at their headquarters. The contract ensures the structural integrity and operational readiness of the 1SFG BTLN HQS. Services delivered include essential roofing repairs and maintenance. The geographic impact is localized to Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington State. The contract supports jobs within the construction and roofing trades sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific bidder count limits assessment of competition intensity.
No small business subcontracting plan details provided, impacting small business ecosystem visibility.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract offers cost control.
Awarded under full and open competition, indicating broad market engagement.
Contract duration suggests a comprehensive approach to roofing needs.
Awarded by GSA, a reputable agency for federal procurement.

Sector Analysis

The roofing contractors industry is a significant segment of the construction sector, providing essential maintenance and repair services for commercial and government facilities. Federal spending in this area is often driven by the need to maintain aging infrastructure and ensure the operational integrity of government buildings. This contract, valued at $2.46 million, falls within the typical range for significant roofing projects on large federal installations. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other roofing contracts for military bases or large federal office buildings.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the data does not indicate any specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing the best offer from the broadest possible market. While this can lead to competitive pricing, it may limit opportunities for small businesses to participate directly in this specific federal contract, unless they are subcontractors to the prime awardee.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically has robust oversight mechanisms for its contracts, including performance monitoring and financial accountability. As a firm fixed-price contract, the financial risk is largely borne by the contractor, which can simplify oversight. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases. Inspector General oversight would apply if any issues of fraud, waste, or abuse arise during the contract performance period.

Related Government Programs

JBLM Facility Maintenance Contracts
GSA Roofing Services
Department of Defense Infrastructure Projects
Federal Building Repair and Maintenance

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen structural issues during roofing work.
Weather-related delays impacting project timeline.
Contractor performance risk if quality or schedule is not met.
Limited visibility into specific bidder competition numbers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2.5 million to PACIFIC TECH CONSTRUCTION INC. BPA CALL ORDER 0083 FOR JBLM RR ROOF 1SFG BTLN HQS 9934

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PACIFIC TECH CONSTRUCTION INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-11-21. End: 2026-07-01.

What is the track record of Pacific Tech Construction Inc. with federal contracts, particularly with the GSA?

Pacific Tech Construction Inc. has a history of performing federal contracts. A detailed review of their past performance, especially with the General Services Administration (GSA), would be crucial. This includes examining their successful completion of previous roofing or construction projects, any history of contract disputes, timely delivery, and adherence to quality standards. Analyzing their performance on similar-sized contracts can provide insight into their capability to execute this $2.46 million project effectively. Information on past performance is often available through federal procurement data systems, which can highlight their reliability and experience.

How does the $2.46 million award compare to similar roofing projects at other military installations?

Benchmarking this $2.46 million award against similar roofing projects at other military installations requires access to comparable contract data. Factors such as the size of the facility, the complexity of the roofing system, the specific materials used, and the prevailing labor costs in the region all influence project pricing. Generally, large-scale roofing projects for headquarters or significant operational buildings on military bases can range from hundreds of thousands to several million dollars. Without specific details on the scope of work and the square footage being covered at JBLM, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the firm fixed-price nature and full and open competition suggest an effort to secure competitive pricing.

What are the primary risks associated with this roofing contract, and how are they mitigated?

Primary risks for this roofing contract include potential delays due to weather, unforeseen structural issues discovered during work, material price fluctuations (though mitigated by fixed-price), and contractor performance issues. Mitigation strategies often involve detailed project planning, contingency allowances for weather, thorough site assessments before work begins, and robust contract management by the GSA. The firm fixed-price contract shifts much of the financial risk to Pacific Tech Construction Inc., incentivizing them to manage costs and timelines effectively. Performance bonds and clear contract terms also serve as risk mitigation tools.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the operational effectiveness of the 1SFG BTLN HQS at JBLM?

This contract is expected to significantly enhance the operational effectiveness of the 1st Special Forces Battalion Headquarters (1SFG BTLN HQS) at JBLM by ensuring the integrity and functionality of its roof. A well-maintained roof protects sensitive equipment, prevents water damage to infrastructure and supplies, and provides a secure and climate-controlled working environment for personnel. By addressing roofing needs, the contract contributes to the overall readiness and operational capability of the unit housed within the facility, preventing disruptions caused by leaks or structural damage.

How has federal spending on roofing contractors evolved over the past five years, and does this contract align with trends?

Federal spending on roofing contractors has generally remained consistent, driven by the continuous need to maintain aging government infrastructure across various agencies and military branches. Trends may show shifts towards more sustainable roofing materials or advanced installation techniques, influenced by environmental regulations and technological advancements. This $2.46 million contract for JBLM appears to align with typical federal investment in essential facility maintenance. Analyzing broader federal procurement data for construction and maintenance services would reveal specific spending patterns and whether this contract represents a significant deviation or a standard allocation for such a project.

What are the implications of awarding a firm fixed-price contract versus a cost-plus contract for this type of project?

A firm fixed-price (FFP) contract, like the one awarded here, establishes a set price for the work, making the contractor responsible for all costs and profits. This offers the government maximum price certainty and minimizes financial risk, as the final cost will not exceed the agreed-upon amount unless a change order is issued. Conversely, a cost-plus contract reimburses the contractor for allowable costs plus a fee, which can be beneficial for projects with high uncertainty or evolving scopes. For a defined project like roofing replacement or repair, FFP is often preferred for its budget predictability, incentivizing the contractor to control costs efficiently.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors › Roofing Contractors

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QSWC25Q0017

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1302 WALNUT ST, KELSO, WA, 98626

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,456,207

Exercised Options: $2,456,207

Current Obligation: $2,456,207

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSWC23A0004

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline