GSA awards $2.75M for rowing machines, with Concept2, Inc. securing the contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,753 ($2.8K)

Contractor: Concept2, Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2026-04-09

Contract Duration: 8 days

Daily Burn Rate: $344/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Other

Official Description: ROWING MACHINE EXERCISE MACHINE WITH PIVOTING FOOT PLATES WITH ADJUSTABLE STRAPS, GRAY

Place of Performance

Location: MORRISVILLE, LAMOILLE County, VERMONT, 05661

State: Vermont Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2,753.04 to CONCEPT2, INC for work described as: ROWING MACHINE EXERCISE MACHINE WITH PIVOTING FOOT PLATES WITH ADJUSTABLE STRAPS, GRAY Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the equipment. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, suggesting fair market pricing. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a fixed-price contract and established vendor. 4. Performance context is tied to sporting goods manufacturing, a niche sector. 5. Sector positioning is within the General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service, supporting government-wide procurement. 6. The contract duration is relatively short, allowing for periodic re-evaluation of needs.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The unit price for the rowing machines is approximately $2,753.04. While specific benchmarking data for government-issued rowing machines is limited, this price appears competitive for high-quality, durable fitness equipment designed for rigorous use. The vendor, Concept2, Inc., is a well-established manufacturer in this niche, suggesting that the price reflects their market position and product quality. Compared to commercial high-end rowing machines, this price point is within a reasonable range for bulk government procurement.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This process is designed to ensure the government receives the best possible pricing and value by leveraging market forces. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competitive environment was available.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through vendor rivalry, ensuring that public funds are used efficiently.

Public Impact

Federal employees and military personnel will benefit from access to high-quality exercise equipment for fitness and wellness programs. The services delivered include the provision of specialized sporting goods. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, supporting various federal facilities. Workforce implications include supporting the health and readiness of government employees.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for price increases over time due to economic price adjustment clause, though the base price is fixed.
Dependence on a single manufacturer for this specific type of equipment could pose a long-term supply risk if market conditions change.

Positive Signals

Award to a known, reputable manufacturer (Concept2, Inc.) suggests reliability and quality.
Fixed-price contract structure provides cost certainty for the initial term.
Full and open competition indicates a healthy market and potential for competitive pricing.
The contract is a BPA Call, suggesting it leverages an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement, which can streamline procurement.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the sporting and athletic goods manufacturing sector. This is a specialized niche within the broader manufacturing industry. The General Services Administration (GSA) often procures such goods through its Federal Acquisition Service to meet the needs of various federal agencies. Benchmarking spending in this specific sub-sector is challenging due to its specialized nature, but GSA's role suggests a standardized approach to procurement for common government needs.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (sb: false). There is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses within the provided details. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this particular award appears minimal, though larger prime contractors often have broader subcontracting plans.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed under the General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service, which has established oversight mechanisms for procurement. As a BPA Call, it likely falls under the umbrella of the parent BPA's oversight. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

General Services Administration (GSA) Procurement
Federal Acquisition Service (FAS)
Sporting Goods Procurement
Fitness Equipment Contracts

Risk Flags

Economic Price Adjustment Clause
Potential Supply Chain Dependence

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2,753.04 to CONCEPT2, INC. ROWING MACHINE EXERCISE MACHINE WITH PIVOTING FOOT PLATES WITH ADJUSTABLE STRAPS, GRAY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CONCEPT2, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2,753.04.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-04-09.

What is the track record of Concept2, Inc. as a government contractor?

Concept2, Inc. is a well-established manufacturer of rowing machines, widely recognized for the quality and durability of its products in both commercial and athletic markets. While specific details on their historical government contract performance are not provided in this data snippet, their long-standing reputation suggests a capacity to meet demanding specifications. Government agencies often procure from established brands known for reliability, especially for equipment intended for frequent use. Further analysis would involve reviewing past performance evaluations and contract history within federal procurement databases to assess their overall track record with government entities.

How does the awarded price compare to similar federal contracts for rowing machines?

Direct comparison of the awarded unit price of $2,753.04 for these rowing machines to identical federal contracts is difficult without more specific contract details. However, considering Concept2, Inc. is a premium brand, this price is likely competitive for high-quality, durable rowing equipment. Government contracts for fitness equipment can vary widely based on specifications, quantity, and vendor. The 'full and open competition' suggests that this price was deemed fair market value at the time of award. Benchmarking against other GSA schedules or similar agency procurements for comparable fitness equipment would provide a broader context, but this price appears reasonable for a specialized, high-performance item.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract?

The primary risks associated with this contract are relatively low. The contract is a fixed-price award, which provides cost certainty for the government. The vendor, Concept2, Inc., is a reputable manufacturer, reducing the risk of product quality issues. The contract duration is short (8 months), allowing for reassessment of needs and market conditions. A potential risk could be the 'economic price adjustment' clause, which might allow for price increases under certain economic conditions, although the base price is fixed. Another minor risk could be supply chain disruptions affecting a single manufacturer, though Concept2 has a strong market presence. The 'full and open competition' mitigates risks related to vendor lock-in.

How effective is the General Services Administration (GSA) in procuring sporting goods like these?

The GSA, through its Federal Acquisition Service (FAS), is generally effective in procuring a wide range of goods and services, including sporting equipment, for the federal government. Their established procurement processes, including the use of Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs) and competitive bidding, aim to achieve best value for taxpayers. The 'full and open competition' utilized here is a standard GSA practice designed to ensure fair pricing and access to a broad vendor base. The effectiveness in this specific instance hinges on whether the procured equipment meets the intended fitness and durability standards for federal personnel, which is typically monitored through performance metrics and user feedback.

What are the historical spending patterns for rowing machines or similar fitness equipment by the federal government?

Historical spending patterns for rowing machines and similar fitness equipment by the federal government are not detailed in the provided data. However, federal agencies, particularly those with fitness centers (e.g., military branches, GSA-managed facilities, federal employee wellness programs), do procure such equipment periodically. Spending would likely fluctuate based on budget allocations for facility upgrades, new construction, or replacement cycles. GSA's role suggests a consolidated approach to procurement, potentially leading to more consistent, albeit not necessarily high-volume, spending compared to individual agency procurements. Analyzing historical GSA spending or specific agency solicitations would reveal trends.

What is the significance of the 'BPA CALL' contract type?

The 'BPA CALL' designation indicates that this contract is a task order issued against a pre-existing Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA). BPAs are established by federal agencies to streamline the procurement of commonly purchased items or services from specific vendors. They are not contracts in themselves but rather agreements that simplify the process of placing orders. A 'BPA CALL' signifies a specific order placed under such an agreement. This method is often used for efficiency and cost savings, as the terms and conditions, and sometimes pricing, have already been negotiated. It implies that the GSA has an existing BPA with Concept2, Inc. for sporting goods, and this is a call against that agreement.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing › Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: RECREATIONAL/ATHLETIC EQPT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 105 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR, MORRISVILLE, VT, 05661

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,753

Exercised Options: $2,753

Current Obligation: $2,753

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSSC25A0008

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline