GSA awards $3.8M for utility tools, with Noble Supply & Logistics securing the contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,826 ($3.8K)

Contractor: Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-10

End Date: 2026-04-18

Contract Duration: 8 days

Daily Burn Rate: $478/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 22

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: UTILITY TOOL

Place of Performance

Location: ROCKLAND, PLYMOUTH County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02370

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3,825.6 to NOBLE SUPPLY & LOGISTICS, LLC for work described as: UTILITY TOOL Key points: 1. Contract value of $3.8M for utility tools suggests a significant demand for these essential items. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. A firm-fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 4. The short duration of the task order (8 days) implies an immediate need or a specific, time-bound requirement. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 332510 points to hardware manufacturing as the primary sector. 6. The award was made via a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, suggesting it's part of a larger, pre-negotiated agreement.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.8 million for utility tools appears reasonable given the scope and the fact that it was awarded through full and open competition. While specific per-unit pricing is not detailed here, the competitive nature of the award suggests that pricing was likely benchmarked against market rates. The firm-fixed-price structure further supports value for money by locking in costs. Comparing this to similar large-scale procurements for hardware and tools, this award falls within expected ranges for significant government needs.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 22 bids indicates a robust level of interest and a healthy competitive environment for this particular requirement. Such a high number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified vendors, ultimately benefiting the government by ensuring it receives the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: A high number of bidders in a full and open competition generally translates to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers, as vendors vie to win the contract.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring utility tools will benefit from this contract, ensuring operational readiness. The contract supports the supply chain for essential hardware manufacturing, contributing to the broader industrial base. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, as GSA contracts often serve multiple federal installations. Workforce implications may include support for manufacturing and logistics jobs within the hardware sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if this BPA call is part of a long-term strategy without regular re-competition.
Dependence on a single awardee for a significant volume of utility tools could pose supply chain risks.
Limited visibility into the specific types and quality of utility tools procured without further detail.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, ensuring a broad base of potential suppliers.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty and limits the government's exposure to cost overruns.
The use of a BPA call suggests an efficient procurement process leveraging existing agreements.
A high number of bids (22) indicates strong market interest and competitive pressure.

Sector Analysis

The hardware manufacturing sector, classified under NAICS code 332510, encompasses establishments that produce metal hardware. This contract for utility tools fits within this sector, serving a critical function for various government operations. The General Services Administration (GSA) frequently procures such items to support federal agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks for hardware and tools can vary widely, but a $3.8 million award indicates a substantial requirement, potentially for widespread distribution or specialized toolkits.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside, as indicated by 'ss': false and 'sb': false. The award to Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC, a company that is not explicitly identified as a small business in the provided data, suggests it may be a larger entity or that small business participation was not a primary set-aside criterion for this specific award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses within the performance of this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed under the General Services Administration (GSA), which has established oversight mechanisms for its procurement processes. The Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) likely oversees this specific award. Transparency is generally maintained through public contract databases like FPDS. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which holds the contractor responsible for delivering goods at the agreed-upon price. Inspector General oversight would apply if any issues of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedules Program
Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) Contracts
Hardware and Tools Procurement
Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Supply Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for quality issues if contractor prioritizes cost over quality to meet fixed price.
Supply chain disruption risk if Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC faces internal issues.
Limited visibility into specific tool types and quality standards without further documentation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3,825.6 to NOBLE SUPPLY & LOGISTICS, LLC. UTILITY TOOL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NOBLE SUPPLY & LOGISTICS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3,825.6.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-10. End: 2026-04-18.

What is the track record of Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC with federal contracts, particularly for utility tools?

Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC has a history of federal contracting, as evidenced by this award. To fully assess their track record, a deeper dive into their past performance data is necessary. This would involve examining previous contracts awarded to them, their performance ratings on those contracts, and any instances of contract disputes or terminations. Specifically for utility tools, understanding their experience in supplying similar items, their ability to meet delivery schedules, and the quality of products previously provided would be crucial. Without access to detailed contract performance databases, it's difficult to provide a comprehensive assessment of their reliability and expertise in this specific product category.

How does the $3.8 million award compare to historical GSA spending on utility tools?

The $3.8 million award for utility tools represents a significant procurement action. To benchmark this against historical spending, one would need to analyze GSA's (and potentially other agencies') expenditure data for similar items over several fiscal years. This analysis would involve identifying contracts with comparable Product Service Codes (PSCs) or NAICS codes related to hardware and tools. Understanding the average contract values, the number of awards, and the frequency of such large procurements would provide context. A $3.8 million award could indicate a surge in demand, a consolidation of requirements, or a shift towards larger, more comprehensive contracts compared to previous periods.

What are the primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price contract for utility tools?

While firm-fixed-price contracts offer cost certainty, risks can still exist. One primary risk is that the contractor might face challenges in sourcing materials or manufacturing at the fixed price, potentially leading to quality compromises if not adequately monitored. Another risk is that the fixed price might not accurately reflect current market fluctuations if the contract duration is extended or if unforeseen supply chain disruptions occur. Furthermore, if the scope of 'utility tools' is very broad, the government might not achieve the best value if the contractor focuses on lower-cost, less durable items to meet the price point. Robust quality assurance and acceptance testing are critical to mitigate these risks.

What does the high number of bidders (22) suggest about the market for utility tools procured by the government?

The fact that 22 vendors submitted bids for this utility tools contract strongly suggests a competitive and accessible market. This indicates that multiple companies are capable of supplying these items and are interested in securing government contracts. A high number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing, as vendors strive to offer the most attractive terms to win the award. It also implies that the barriers to entry for supplying utility tools to the federal government, at least through GSA's MAS program, are not prohibitively high for a significant number of firms. This competitive landscape is generally favorable for the government and taxpayers.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the availability and variety of utility tools for federal agencies?

This $3.8 million contract is likely to ensure a steady and substantial supply of utility tools for various federal agencies over its duration. By consolidating requirements through a single BPA call, agencies can expect consistent availability and potentially standardized specifications for the tools procured. This can simplify inventory management and maintenance. However, the focus might be on the specific types of tools included in the BPA's scope. If the BPA is narrowly defined, agencies might have less flexibility to procure highly specialized or niche tools outside of this contract, potentially limiting variety for very specific operational needs.

How does the award mechanism (BPA Call) influence the overall value and efficiency of this procurement?

Awarding this contract via a BPA Call signifies that it is an order placed against a pre-existing Blanket Purchase Agreement. BPAs are typically established to streamline the procurement of commonly purchased items or services from specific vendors. Using a BPA Call generally leads to increased efficiency and potentially better value because the foundational terms, conditions, and pricing have already been negotiated and vetted. This reduces the administrative burden and time associated with a new, full solicitation. For taxpayers, this means faster delivery of needed goods and potentially lower administrative costs compared to traditional contract awards.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Hardware Manufacturing › Hardware Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: HAND TOOLS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 22

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1 MARINA PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220, BOSTON, MA, 02210

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,826

Exercised Options: $3,826

Current Obligation: $3,826

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSHA21A0006

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline