GSA awards $3.1M contract for paper and copying services to ASCI Federal Services LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $3,131 ($3.1K)
Contractor: Asci Federal Services LLC
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2026-04-03
End Date: 2026-04-06
Contract Duration: 3 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: PAPER, COPYING, XEROGRAPHIC PROCESS: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.
Place of Performance
Location: ANCHORAGE, ANCHORAGE County, ALASKA, 99501
State: Alaska Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $3,131.36 to ASCI FEDERAL SERVICES LLC for work described as: PAPER, COPYING, XEROGRAPHIC PROCESS: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL. Key points: 1. Contract value of $3.1M over 3 years suggests a moderate scale for office supply procurement. 2. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 3. Competition was 'Full and Open After Exclusion of Sources', indicating a potentially limited but not sole-source award. 4. The award to ASCI Federal Services LLC warrants a review of their past performance and capacity. 5. Geographic scope is limited to Alaska, suggesting a regional focus for these services. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 493190 points to warehousing and storage, which may encompass more than just paper supply.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $3.1M over three years averages to approximately $1.04M annually. Without specific details on the quantity and type of paper and copying services, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, for general office supplies and related services, this annual spend is within a typical range for federal agencies. Benchmarking against similar contracts for office supplies would be necessary for a more precise evaluation of pricing and value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The competition type 'Full and Open After Exclusion of Sources' indicates that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources were excluded. This suggests that the pool of potential bidders may have been restricted, potentially impacting the breadth of competition. The presence of 4 bids indicates some level of interest, but the exclusion of sources warrants further investigation into the rationale and its effect on price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition may have resulted in a higher price than if the contract had been fully open to all potential sources. Taxpayers could be paying a premium due to the restricted bidding process.
Public Impact
Federal agencies operating in Alaska will benefit from the provision of essential paper and copying services. The contract ensures the continuity of administrative and operational functions requiring these supplies. The geographic impact is concentrated within Alaska, supporting federal operations in that state. Workforce implications are likely minimal, primarily related to the delivery and management of supplies.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' raises concerns about the extent of true competition and potential price inflation.
- Lack of detailed service descriptions makes it difficult to assess if the scope aligns with actual needs and market capabilities.
- The NAICS code 493190 (Other Warehousing and Storage) might indicate a broader scope than just paper and copying, requiring clarification on service specifics.
Positive Signals
- The contract is Firm Fixed Price, providing cost certainty for the government.
- The award was made after some level of competition, with 4 bids received.
- The contract duration of 3 years allows for stable service provision.
Sector Analysis
The market for office supplies and related services, including paper and copying, is a mature and competitive sector. Federal agencies are significant consumers, with spending often managed through large, consolidated contracts or smaller, agency-specific awards. This contract, falling under warehousing and storage, suggests a potential focus on logistics and distribution in addition to the products themselves. Benchmarks for similar contracts would typically consider volume discounts, delivery efficiency, and the range of products offered.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside (sb: false). There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans or their impact on the small business ecosystem. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses are involved in the supply chain or if there are opportunities for them to participate.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability measures are inherent in the Firm Fixed Price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified goods and services at an agreed-upon price. Transparency would be enhanced by publicizing the detailed contract terms and performance metrics, though such details are not provided here. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Office Supplies Procurement
- General Services Administration Contracts
- Warehousing and Storage Services
- Federal Agency Operational Support
Risk Flags
- Limited competition due to source exclusion.
- Potential for unutilized warehousing services if scope is broader than needed.
- Geographic concentration in Alaska may limit contractor options and increase costs.
Tags
gsa, federal-acquisition-service, ascialaska, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, limited-competition, office-supplies, copying-services, warehousing-storage, alaska, moderate-value
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $3,131.36 to ASCI FEDERAL SERVICES LLC. PAPER, COPYING, XEROGRAPHIC PROCESS: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ASCI FEDERAL SERVICES LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $3,131.36.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-03. End: 2026-04-06.
What is the specific nature of the 'paper, copying, xerographic process' services being procured, and how does the NAICS code 493190 (Other Warehousing and Storage) relate to this?
The provided data indicates the contract is for 'PAPER, COPYING, XEROGRAPHIC PROCESS: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.' The NAICS code 493190, 'Other Warehousing and Storage,' suggests that the contract likely encompasses more than just the direct supply of paper and copying services. It may include the storage, management, and distribution of these supplies, potentially involving logistics, inventory control, and delivery services within Alaska. The 'attached document' would contain the specific details of the services, including the types of paper, copying capabilities (e.g., printing, scanning, copying volumes), and the warehousing aspects. Without this document, the precise scope remains broad, but the NAICS code implies a logistical component beyond simple procurement.
What does 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' mean in practice for this contract?
This procurement method signifies a complex approach to competition. 'Full and Open Competition' is the standard for federal contracting, aiming to maximize opportunities for all responsible sources. However, the addition of 'After Exclusion of Sources' means that while the competition was intended to be broad, specific potential bidders or categories of bidders were intentionally excluded. The reasons for exclusion must be justified and documented, often related to specific technical requirements, past performance issues, or national security concerns. In practice, this limits the number of eligible bidders, potentially reducing the competitive pressure on pricing and innovation compared to a truly unrestricted full and open competition. The fact that 4 bids were received suggests some level of interest, but the exclusion raises questions about whether the government secured the best possible value.
How does the Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type benefit the government in this scenario?
The Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type is generally advantageous for the government when the scope of work is well-defined and the risks of cost overruns are manageable. For a contract involving paper, copying, and warehousing services, an FFP structure provides cost certainty. The contractor, ASCI Federal Services LLC, assumes the primary risk for any cost increases related to labor, materials, or overhead. This means the government knows the exact price it will pay for the specified goods and services, simplifying budgeting and financial planning. The benefit to taxpayers is protection against unexpected price escalations, provided the initial price was set competitively and reflects a reasonable estimate of costs and profit.
What is the significance of the contract being awarded for Alaska (st: AK, sn: ALASKA)?
The geographic limitation to Alaska indicates that this contract is specifically intended to serve federal entities or operations within that state. This could be due to logistical considerations, the specific needs of agencies operating in remote areas, or a strategy to support regional contractors. For federal agencies in Alaska, this contract ensures a dedicated supply chain for essential office materials and services. It may also reflect the higher costs associated with doing business in remote or geographically challenging locations, which could influence pricing. The focus on a specific region suggests that the procurement process considered the unique operational environment and distribution challenges within Alaska.
What are the potential risks associated with the limited competition and the NAICS code for warehousing?
The primary risk associated with 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' is the potential for reduced competition, which could lead to higher prices and less innovation than a truly open process. If the exclusion criteria were not well-justified or overly restrictive, the government might not have received the most advantageous offers. Furthermore, the NAICS code 493190 suggests a warehousing and storage component. If the government's primary need is simply paper and copying, but the contract includes extensive warehousing services, there's a risk of paying for services not fully utilized or needed. Conversely, if warehousing is critical, the exclusion of sources might limit the availability of specialized logistics providers, potentially impacting service reliability or efficiency in Alaska.
What is ASCI Federal Services LLC's track record with similar contracts?
Information regarding ASCI Federal Services LLC's track record with similar contracts is not provided in the data. A thorough analysis would require examining their past performance evaluations on federal contracts, particularly those involving office supplies, copying services, or warehousing and logistics. Key areas to investigate would include on-time delivery, quality of goods and services, responsiveness to issues, and overall customer satisfaction. A history of successful performance on comparable contracts would increase confidence in their ability to meet the requirements of this new award. Conversely, a record of deficiencies or disputes could indicate a higher risk for this contract.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Warehousing and Storage › Other Warehousing and Storage
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 721 DEPOT DR, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99501
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $3,131
Exercised Options: $3,131
Current Obligation: $3,131
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47QSCC23D0001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-03
Current End Date: 2026-04-06
Potential End Date: 2026-04-06 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-05
More Contracts from Asci Federal Services LLC
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)