HII Mission Technologies Corp awarded $51.7M for F-16 MTT TSSC services by GSA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $51,725,246 ($51.7M)

Contractor: HII Mission Technologies Corp

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-03-01

End Date: 2026-11-30

Contract Duration: 639 days

Daily Burn Rate: $80.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Defense

Official Description: F-16 MTT TSSC

Place of Performance

Location: JB ANDREWS, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20762

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $51.7 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: F-16 MTT TSSC Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in specialized technical support for the F-16 program. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration extends into late 2026, indicating a medium-term need for these services. 4. The 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' NAICS code covers a broad range of activities. 5. The use of a Time and Materials contract type may pose cost control challenges if not closely managed. 6. The prime contractor, HII Mission Technologies Corp, has a substantial presence in the defense sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific service details and comparable contract data. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure, while common for evolving requirements, can lead to higher costs if not managed diligently. The awarded amount of $51.7 million over approximately two years suggests a significant but not exceptionally high per-year spend for specialized technical support in the defense sector. Further analysis would require comparing the labor rates and overhead applied to similar technical support contracts for major defense platforms.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of only one bid (no: 1) is unusual for a full and open competition and raises questions about the level of actual market interest or the specificity of the requirements. While full and open competition is generally preferred for maximizing price discovery, a single bid could suggest limited market availability for these specialized services or potential barriers to entry for other firms.

Taxpayer Impact: A single bid in a full and open competition may limit the government's ability to secure the lowest possible price, potentially leading to less favorable outcomes for taxpayers compared to a multi-bid scenario.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Air Force and potentially allied nations operating the F-16 fighter jet, receiving enhanced technical support. Services delivered likely include technical support, sustainment, training, and modernization assistance for the F-16 platform. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around F-16 operating bases and HII Mission Technologies Corp facilities, with potential global reach for F-16 support. Workforce implications include the creation or sustainment of specialized technical and engineering jobs within HII Mission Technologies Corp and its potential subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The Time and Materials contract type introduces inherent cost escalation risks if not rigorously monitored and controlled.
A single bid under 'full and open competition' warrants scrutiny regarding the breadth of market engagement and potential for price optimization.
The broad NAICS code 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' makes it difficult to assess the specific value and efficiency of the services provided without further detail.

Positive Signals

Award to HII Mission Technologies Corp, a known entity in defense contracting, suggests a level of established capability and experience.
The contract is awarded by the General Services Administration (GSA), which often implies adherence to established procurement processes and oversight.
The contract duration extending to late 2026 provides stability for critical F-16 program support.

Sector Analysis

The aerospace and defense sector is characterized by complex, high-value contracts for aircraft, systems, and support services. Spending in this sector is driven by national security requirements and technological advancements. The F-16 program represents a mature but continuously supported platform, requiring ongoing technical expertise for sustainment and upgrades. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other major platform sustainment contracts, which can range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars annually, depending on the scope and platform age.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions (ss: false, sb: false). The prime contractor, HII Mission Technologies Corp, is a large business. There is potential for small business participation through subcontracting opportunities, but this is not explicitly detailed in the provided data. The absence of set-asides means that large businesses were the primary focus of this procurement, and the direct impact on the small business ecosystem through this specific prime contract award is likely minimal unless significant subcontracting occurs.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Acquisition Service, which awarded the contract. As a Delivery Order under a larger contract vehicle, the oversight mechanisms would follow the established procedures of that vehicle. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Accountability measures would involve performance metrics and reporting requirements stipulated in the contract terms. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

F-16 Sustainment Programs
Air Force Logistics and Maintenance Contracts
Defense Technical Support Services
Aerospace Engineering Services
Government-wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs)

Risk Flags

Single bid in full and open competition
Time and Materials contract type risk
Broad NAICS code limits specificity

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $51.7 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. F-16 MTT TSSC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $51.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-03-01. End: 2026-11-30.

What is the specific nature of the 'F-16 MTT TSSC' services being procured?

The abbreviation 'F-16 MTT TSSC' likely stands for 'F-16 Mission Training System Technical Support Contract' or a similar designation. 'MTT' could refer to Mission Training or Mobile Training Team, and 'TSSC' to Technical Support Services Contract. These services typically involve providing specialized expertise to support the operation, maintenance, training, and potentially modernization of the F-16 fighter jet's systems, particularly those related to training simulators or mission planning software. Without more specific documentation, the exact scope remains broad, encompassing technical assistance, troubleshooting, system updates, and potentially training development or delivery for F-16 related technologies.

How does the awarded amount of $51.7 million compare to historical spending on similar F-16 support contracts?

Comparing this $51.7 million award to historical spending requires access to detailed historical contract data for F-16 support services, which is not provided. However, for a platform as widely operated and long-serving as the F-16, annual sustainment and technical support costs can easily run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars across various contracts and agencies. This specific award, covering a period of roughly two years (late 2024 to late 2026), suggests an annual spend of approximately $25-26 million. This figure appears reasonable for a specialized technical support component within the broader F-16 ecosystem, but its true value comparison depends on the specific services rendered and the number of F-16s or training systems supported.

What are the primary risks associated with the Time and Materials (T&M) contract type for this F-16 support service?

The primary risk with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract type, such as this one for F-16 support, is the potential for cost overruns. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M agreements reimburse the contractor for direct labor hours at specified rates and for the actual cost of materials used. This structure can incentivize longer task durations or less efficient work if not managed closely by the government. For the F-16 MTT TSSC, risks include the contractor potentially billing for excessive hours, using more expensive materials than necessary, or experiencing scope creep without adequate cost controls. Effective government oversight, including detailed review of timesheets and material invoices, is crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure value for taxpayer money.

What does the single bid under 'full and open competition' imply about the contractor's position and market dynamics?

A single bid submitted under a 'full and open competition' solicitation is an unusual outcome that warrants careful consideration. It could imply several things: 1) The requirements were highly specialized, and only HII Mission Technologies Corp possessed the unique qualifications, facilities, or security clearances necessary. 2) The solicitation may have had specific terms or conditions that deterred other potential bidders. 3) Market research might have been insufficient, or the government may not have effectively reached all capable sources. From a taxpayer perspective, a single bid reduces competitive pressure, potentially leading to a higher price than if multiple bidders had vied for the contract. It also limits the government's ability to compare technical approaches and pricing strategies.

What is HII Mission Technologies Corp's track record with similar government contracts, particularly in defense technical services?

Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII), the parent company of HII Mission Technologies Corp, is a major defense contractor with a long and extensive track record of serving the U.S. government, particularly the Department of Defense. HII Mission Technologies Corp specifically focuses on providing advanced capabilities in areas like cyber, intelligence, space, and enterprise IT. They have a history of supporting complex defense programs, including aviation platforms. While specific details on their performance for 'F-16 MTT TSSC' are not provided here, their overall profile suggests significant experience in managing large, technical service contracts. Past performance evaluations, available through government databases, would offer a more granular view of their reliability, quality of service, and adherence to schedule and budget on similar contracts.

How does the $809,470 benchmark value (br) relate to the total contract award?

The 'br' field, listed as 809470, likely represents a benchmark or reference value, possibly related to a specific component, service level, or a previous contract iteration. Its exact meaning is unclear without further context or a data dictionary. If it represents a benchmark for a specific task or unit of service, comparing the total contract value ($51.7 million) against this benchmark could reveal cost efficiencies or potential overruns depending on the scope it covers. For instance, if $809,470 was the cost for a similar service in a prior period or for a comparable contract, and this new contract implies a significantly higher cost for the same output, it would raise concerns. Conversely, if it represents a baseline and the current contract achieves more or better services for a proportionally similar cost, it could be viewed positively.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFWA24R0012

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc

Address: 8350 BROAD ST STE 1400, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $197,991,708

Exercised Options: $69,220,040

Current Obligation: $51,725,246

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2

Total Subaward Amount: $741,500

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QFCA22D0401

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline