GSA awards $76M contract to KBR Wyle Services for aviation training, raising questions about competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $76,070,443 ($76.1M)
Contractor: KBR Wyle Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2024-01-13
End Date: 2027-01-12
Contract Duration: 1,095 days
Daily Burn Rate: $69.5K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 166TH AVIATION BRIGADE TRAINING SUPPORT FOREIGN MILITARY SALES TRAINING SUPPORT SERVICES MAINTENANCE/LOGISTICS
Place of Performance
Location: FORT HOOD, BELL County, TEXAS, 76544
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $76.1 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC for work described as: 166TH AVIATION BRIGADE TRAINING SUPPORT FOREIGN MILITARY SALES TRAINING SUPPORT SERVICES MAINTENANCE/LOGISTICS Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a non-competitive basis, limiting price discovery and potentially increasing costs. 2. Significant duration of nearly three years suggests a long-term need for these specialized services. 3. The contract's value places it among larger service contracts, requiring careful oversight. 4. Focus on foreign military sales training indicates a strategic role in international defense cooperation. 5. The use of Time and Materials pricing can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. 6. The specific NAICS code (611512) points to a niche but critical area of aviation instruction.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's value of $76 million over three years for aviation training services is substantial. Without a competitive bidding process, it is difficult to benchmark the pricing against market rates or similar contracts. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure, while flexible, carries inherent risks of cost escalation if not rigorously monitored. The absence of competition makes a direct value-for-money assessment challenging, suggesting potential for overpayment compared to a fully competed scenario.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' basis, indicating a sole-source procurement. This means that only one vendor, KBR Wyle Services, LLC, was solicited. The lack of competition prevents other qualified vendors from offering their services and potentially lower prices. This approach is typically justified when only one source possesses the required capabilities or when urgency dictates.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive pressure. Without multiple bids, the government has less leverage to negotiate the best possible price, potentially leading to less efficient use of public funds.
Public Impact
Foreign military personnel will receive specialized aviation training, enhancing their operational capabilities. The services include training support, maintenance, and logistics for aviation assets. The contract's primary geographic impact is likely within Texas, where the contractor is based, but the training may extend globally to partner nations. This contract supports a specialized segment of the defense industrial base, requiring skilled instructors and support staff.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Non-competitive award limits transparency and potential cost savings.
- Time and Materials pricing structure poses a risk of budget overruns.
- Lack of defined performance metrics in the provided data makes outcome assessment difficult.
Positive Signals
- Contract addresses a critical need for foreign military aviation training.
- KBR Wyle Services, LLC is an established contractor with experience in defense support.
- The contract duration suggests a stable, long-term requirement being met.
Sector Analysis
The aviation training sector is a specialized segment within the broader aerospace and defense industry. This contract falls under flight training services, often involving complex simulators, aircraft, and highly skilled instructors. The market for such services is influenced by defense budgets, international relations, and technological advancements in aviation. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without knowing the specific training modules and aircraft involved, but large-scale training contracts can run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars.
Small Business Impact
The contract data indicates that small business participation is not a primary focus, as the award is not set aside for small businesses and the prime contractor is a large entity. There is no explicit mention of subcontracting plans for small businesses within the provided details. This suggests that the primary benefits of this contract will likely flow to the large prime contractor and its direct employees or major subcontractors, rather than significantly impacting the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) through its Federal Acquisition Service. Given the sole-source nature and T&M pricing, rigorous oversight will be crucial to ensure performance standards are met and costs are controlled. Accountability measures would typically involve contract performance reviews, milestone tracking, and financial audits. Transparency may be limited due to the non-competitive award, but contract modifications and performance reports should be publicly accessible.
Related Government Programs
- Foreign Military Sales Program
- Aviation Training Services
- Defense Contractor Support Services
- Logistics and Maintenance Support
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award raises concerns about price fairness and competition.
- Time and Materials pricing structure increases risk of cost overruns.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics in summary data hinders oversight.
- Potential for contractor lock-in due to non-competitive nature.
Tags
defense, gsa, general-services-administration, kbr-wyle-services-llc, aviation-training, flight-training, foreign-military-sales, sole-source, time-and-materials, definitive-contract, texas, 611512
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $76.1 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC. 166TH AVIATION BRIGADE TRAINING SUPPORT FOREIGN MILITARY SALES TRAINING SUPPORT SERVICES MAINTENANCE/LOGISTICS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $76.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-01-13. End: 2027-01-12.
What is the specific nature of the aviation training provided under this contract, and what aircraft or systems are involved?
The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Flight Training' under NAICS code 611512, and includes 'TRAINING SUPPORT SERVICES MAINTENANCE/LOGISTICS'. However, the specific aircraft, simulators, or aviation systems involved are not detailed. This level of specificity is crucial for understanding the scope and complexity of the training. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the appropriateness of the pricing or the contractor's unique qualifications. Further details would likely be found in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW), which is not publicly available in this data extract. The training likely supports pilots, maintenance crews, or other aviation personnel for foreign military partners.
How does the $76 million contract value compare to similar aviation training contracts awarded by the U.S. government?
Benchmarking this $76 million contract against similar aviation training contracts is challenging without more specific details on the training scope, duration, and type of aircraft or systems involved. However, large-scale aviation training and support contracts can range significantly. Contracts for basic flight training might be smaller, while those involving advanced simulator development, complex aircraft maintenance, or training for multiple foreign military platforms could easily reach or exceed this value. The non-competitive nature of this award makes direct comparison difficult, as fully competed contracts often yield lower prices. A comprehensive review would require access to the contract's SOW and historical data on similarly scoped, competed procurements.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and deliverables expected from KBR Wyle Services, LLC under this contract?
The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or detailed deliverables for this contract. Typically, aviation training contracts would include metrics related to student graduation rates, proficiency levels achieved, instructor qualifications, aircraft/simulator availability, and timely completion of maintenance and logistics tasks. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure suggests that performance will be monitored against defined tasks and labor hours, rather than fixed outcomes. Robust oversight by the GSA would involve tracking these metrics to ensure the contractor meets its obligations and provides value for the funds expended. The absence of explicit KPIs in the summary data is a limitation for assessing performance risk.
What is the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and were alternative sources considered?
The data explicitly states the contract was awarded 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' indicating a sole-source justification. Common reasons for sole-source awards include unique capabilities possessed by only one contractor, urgent and compelling needs where competition is impractical, or specific requirements tied to existing systems where only the original equipment manufacturer or its designated partner can provide the service. Without access to the official justification document (e.g., a Justification and Approval - J&A), the precise rationale remains unknown. However, the government is required to document and approve such justifications, often involving market research to confirm the lack of viable alternatives. The lack of competition here warrants scrutiny regarding whether alternatives were truly unavailable or if the justification was adequately supported.
What is the historical spending pattern for aviation training support services by the General Services Administration or the Department of Defense?
Historical spending on aviation training support services by the GSA and DoD is substantial and varies year to year based on global security needs and military readiness requirements. The GSA, through its Federal Acquisition Service, often facilitates contracts for various government agencies, including defense-related services, leveraging its procurement expertise. The DoD is the largest single purchaser of aviation training globally. While specific aggregate figures for 'aviation training support services' are not readily available without deep dives into budget reports and contract databases, the overall defense budget allocates significant portions to training and readiness. Contracts like this one, especially those supporting Foreign Military Sales, are part of a broader strategy to equip and train allied forces, reflecting consistent, albeit fluctuating, levels of investment in this area.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Educational Services › Technical and Trade Schools › Flight Training
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: 47QFWA24R0001
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: KBR, Inc.
Address: 22309 EXPLORATION DRIVE, LEXINGTON PARK, MD, 20653
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $93,313,854
Exercised Options: $93,313,854
Current Obligation: $76,070,443
Actual Outlays: $42,313,206
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-01-13
Current End Date: 2027-01-12
Potential End Date: 2027-01-12 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-26
More Contracts from KBR Wyle Services, LLC
- Bioastronautics Contract-Activities for the Health &productivity of Crews Working and Living in Space — $1.5B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Fpds-Ng Mission Systems Operations Contract (msoc) — $1.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Acquire Engineering Services and Related Services to MSD and Related Organizations Throughout Gsfc, AS Required, for the Formulation, Design, Development, Fabrication, Integration, Testing, Verification, and Operations of Space Flight and Ground System Hardware and Software, Including Development and Validation of NEW Technologies to Enable Future Space and Science Missions. the Engineering Areas of Emphasis ARE Multidisciplinary With Concentration in the Mechanical Engineering Areas of Materials, Structural Analysis and Loads, Mechanical Design, Electromechanical Design, Thermal, Contamination and Coatings, Manufacturing and Integration and Test — $728.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- 200106!000121!1700!F7004 !marine Corps Logistics Base !M6700499C0002 !a!n!*!n!p00015 !20010228!20080930!041014242!041014242!139691877!n!honeywell Technology Solutions!7000 Columbia Gateway Driv!columbia !md!21046!35000!031!12!jacksonville !duval !florida !+000004292865!n!n!000000000000!j049!maint & Repair of Eq/Maintenance & Repair Shop EQ !a4a!combat Vehicles !2000!NOT Discernable or Classified !811310!*!*!3! ! !C!*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !N!J!2!006!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $670.1M (Department of Defense)
- Mission Operations Management Services (moms) — $623.8M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)