GSA awards $18.5M IT services contract to Peraton Inc. for Air Force program management system
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $18,536,032 ($18.5M)
Contractor: Peraton Inc.
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2022-04-23
End Date: 2026-12-22
Contract Duration: 1,704 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: THIS REQUIREMENT IS FOR AFCEC AIR PROGRAM INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (APIMS) TASK ORDER AT SAN ANTONIO TEXAS.
Place of Performance
Location: JBSA LACKLAND, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78236
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $18.5 million to PERATON INC. for work described as: THIS REQUIREMENT IS FOR AFCEC AIR PROGRAM INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (APIMS) TASK ORDER AT SAN ANTONIO TEXAS. Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is for Computer Systems Design Services, a common IT support category. 3. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 4. The duration of the contract extends over four years, indicating a long-term need. 5. The award is a Delivery Order under a larger contract vehicle. 6. The contract is for services supporting the Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC).
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $18.5 million over approximately four years appears reasonable for a complex IT program management system supporting a major Air Force function. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT system development and support contracts within the federal government would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure is generally favorable for cost control, assuming the scope is well-defined.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. This typically leads to a more robust selection of qualified contractors and potentially better pricing due to market forces. The presence of one awardee suggests Peraton Inc. was the most advantageous offer.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and improve service quality.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is the Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC), which will receive enhanced IT support for its Air Program Information Management System (APIMS). The contract delivers essential computer systems design and support services. The geographic impact is centered in San Antonio, Texas, where the task order is located. This contract supports the operational efficiency and information management capabilities of the Air Force's civil engineering programs.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if requirements are not tightly managed throughout the contract lifecycle.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical IT systems could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
- Ensuring continued innovation and adaptation to evolving Air Force IT needs over the contract term.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive selection process.
- Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- Long-term contract duration allows for stable support and development of the APIMS.
- Contractor Peraton Inc. has experience in government IT services.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically focusing on computer systems design and integration services. The federal IT services market is substantial, with agencies consistently investing in modernizing and maintaining their information systems. This contract supports a critical function within the Department of Defense, aligning with broader government efforts to enhance operational efficiency through technology.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside. However, the prime contractor, Peraton Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors, which would depend on their own subcontracting plans and the nature of the services required.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) as the issuing agency, with the Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) as the end-user and requiring activity. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of cost control. Transparency is facilitated through federal contract databases. Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Air Force IT Modernization Programs
- Department of Defense Information Systems
- Federal Civilian IT Services
- GSA IT Schedule Contracts
- Defense Information Technology Contracting
Risk Flags
- Potential for cybersecurity risks
- Contractor performance dependency
- Scope creep potential
Tags
it-services, computer-systems-design, air-force, gsa, delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, san-antonio, texas, peraton-inc, afcec, dod
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $18.5 million to PERATON INC.. THIS REQUIREMENT IS FOR AFCEC AIR PROGRAM INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (APIMS) TASK ORDER AT SAN ANTONIO TEXAS.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PERATON INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $18.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-04-23. End: 2026-12-22.
What is Peraton Inc.'s track record with similar large-scale IT system development and management contracts for the Department of Defense?
Peraton Inc. has a significant history of performing IT services for various U.S. government agencies, including the Department of Defense. They have been involved in complex projects related to command and control systems, intelligence analysis, and enterprise IT infrastructure. Their experience often includes cybersecurity, cloud migration, and data management solutions. For instance, Peraton has held contracts for large-scale IT modernization efforts and sustainment services. A detailed review of their past performance on contracts of similar size, scope, and complexity, particularly those involving mission-critical systems for the Air Force or other DoD branches, would be necessary to fully assess their capability and reliability for the APIMS task order. This includes examining past performance evaluations and any documented issues or successes.
How does the awarded value of $18.5 million compare to the estimated cost or budget for the APIMS system?
The provided data indicates an award value of $18,536,032.32. Without access to the government's independent government cost estimate (IGCE) or the contractor's proposed price breakdown, a direct comparison to assess value for money is limited. However, the award amount represents the total obligated funds for this specific task order. To benchmark this value, one would typically compare it against the total contract value if this were a sole-source award or against the range of bids received during the full and open competition. If this is a delivery order under an existing indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract, the value should also be considered in the context of the overall IDIQ ceiling and the pricing structure established within that vehicle. A detailed analysis would require comparing this award to similar IT system development and sustainment contracts awarded by the Air Force or GSA.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are likely in place?
Key risks for this contract include potential technical challenges in integrating or upgrading the APIMS, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, contractor performance issues, and the risk of cost overruns if the firm-fixed-price contract is not managed tightly. Given the critical nature of information management for the Air Force, any system downtime or data breach would have significant operational consequences. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust cybersecurity protocols, regular performance reviews by GSA and AFCEC, clear contract performance metrics, and contingency planning for technical issues. The firm-fixed-price structure itself is a risk mitigation tool for the government, shifting some cost overrun risk to the contractor, provided the scope is well-defined and change management is rigorous.
How effective is the APIMS system expected to be in supporting the Air Force Civil Engineer Center's mission?
The effectiveness of the APIMS system hinges on its ability to streamline and manage critical data related to the Air Force's civil engineering programs. This includes aspects like infrastructure management, environmental compliance, and readiness reporting. The contract's focus on computer systems design services suggests an intent to enhance or maintain the system's functionality, user interface, and data integrity. Its success will be measured by its contribution to improved decision-making, operational efficiency, and compliance within AFCEC. The long-term duration of the contract implies a sustained need for these capabilities, suggesting that the APIMS is considered a vital component of AFCEC's operational infrastructure.
What are the historical spending patterns for the Air Program Information Management System (APIMS) or similar systems within the Air Force?
Historical spending on APIMS or comparable systems within the Air Force typically reflects ongoing investments in IT infrastructure, software development, maintenance, and support. Agencies like AFCEC often require substantial and sustained funding for such systems due to their complexity and the critical nature of the data they manage. Spending patterns can fluctuate based on modernization cycles, upgrades, and changes in operational requirements. Without specific historical data for APIMS, one can infer that similar large-scale IT systems supporting military operations often involve multi-year contracts with values ranging from millions to tens of millions of dollars annually. This $18.5 million award for a four-year period aligns with the typical investment profile for maintaining and enhancing critical defense IT systems.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - IT MANAGEMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: 47QFWA22R0006
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 12975 WORLDGATE DR STE 7322, HERNDON, VA, 20170
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $18,539,773
Exercised Options: $18,539,773
Current Obligation: $18,536,032
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 12
Total Subaward Amount: $4,452,948
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47QTCK18D0011
IDV Type: GWAC
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-04-23
Current End Date: 2026-12-22
Potential End Date: 2026-12-22 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-19
More Contracts from Peraton Inc.
- 200107!000034!5700!GZ80 !smc/Pks !F0470101C0001 !A!N!*!Y! !20001103!20061031!052819732!052819732!001216845!n!itt Industries, Inc , Systems !4410 E Fountain Blvd !colorado Sprin !co!80916!16000!041!08!colorado Springs !EL Paso !colorado !+000016429445!n!n!000000000000!ac26!rdte/Missile and Space Systems-Mgmt Support !A2 !missile and Space Systems !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !541710!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!B! !A !Y!R!2!003!B! !A!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!c!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! — $1.7B (Department of Defense)
- THE Exploration and Space Communications Projects Division (ESC) IS a National Resource Located AT Goddard Space Flight Center (gsfc) Which Enables Scientific Discovery and Space Exploration by Providing Innovative and Mission-Effective Space Communications and Navigation Solutions to a Large Community of Diverse Customers. ESC Manages Operational Geostationary Communications Relay Satellites and Ground Systems for the Space Communications and Navigation (scan) Program AT Nasa Headquarters. Today, Scan Network Systems Consist of the Space Network (SN), the Near Earth Network (NEN), and the Deep Space Network (DSN). the Day-To-Day Management of These Three Networks IS Currently NOT Fully Consistent. IT IS the Intention of the Government to Unify the SN and NEN Where Practicable Under This Contract Using Integrated, Common Management Practices and Network Solutions — $1.5B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Nasa Goddard Space Flight Center's (gsfc) Goal for the Space Communications Networks Services Contract (scns) IS to Enable Mission Success for Every Customer Using Scns Services. KEY Objectives of the Scns Contract ARE to Decrease Cost and Maintain or Improve Operational Efficiency and Reliability, While Maintaining an Acceptable Level of Risk and Providing for Safe Operation of the Missions. the Contractor Shall Implement a Safety, Health, and Mission Assurance Program That Provides a Safe and Healthy Work Environment, Minimizes Program Risk, and Maximizes Nasa Mission Success. the Contractor Shall BE Responsible and Accountable for Achieving the Required Results. Core Requirement Functions, Such AS Configuration Management, Quality Assurance, ETC. ARE Required to Support Idiq Task Orders. the Space Network (SN) IS Comprised of a Fleet of On-Orbit Tracking and Data Relay Satellites (tdrs) and Associated Ground Systems That Provide Telecommunications Services. the Nature of the SN Architecture, I.E., Extremely Large Capital Investment, Contractor Operated Facilities, Continuous 24X7 Requirements, ETC., Lends Itself to a Core Requirements Approach. the Ground Network (GN) Consists of an Orbital Tracking Network and the Satellite Laser Ranging Network. the Nature of the Ground Network Architecture, I.E., Diverse MIX of Commercial and Government Assets, Evolving Geographic and Technical Customer Requirements, and Legacy Systems, ETC. Lends Itself to an Idiq Approach. Other Activities, I.E., Very Long Baseline Interferometry Network Operations and Maintenance (O&M), Electronic System Test Laboratory, Requirements Development, Hardware and Software Development, ETC. ARE Best Suited to an Idiq Approach in the Resource-Constrained Environment That Nasa Operates in — $1.2B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Operational Planning Implementation and Assessment Services (opias) Base Award — $800.8M (General Services Administration)
- Sitec 3 EOM Provides Ussocom With O&M Services to Maintain Netops, Maintain Systems & Network Infrastructure, Provide END User & Common Device Support, Provide Configuration, Change, License, & Asset Mgmt. Conduct Training and Perform Imacs Services — $651.0M (General Services Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)