Booz Allen Hamilton awarded $16.15M for IT support services by GSA, with performance in Virginia

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,149,395 ($16.1M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2021-04-23

End Date: 2026-04-22

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: T6 B1 AND C130 LCMP SUPPORT IDIQ TASK ORDER. PERFORMANCE PRIMARILY AT CONTRACT LOCATION IN VA. BASE AND 4 OPTIONS

Place of Performance

Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73150

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $16.1 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: T6 B1 AND C130 LCMP SUPPORT IDIQ TASK ORDER. PERFORMANCE PRIMARILY AT CONTRACT LOCATION IN VA. BASE AND 4 OPTIONS Key points: 1. Contract provides IT support services, aligning with GSA's mission to facilitate government operations. 2. The contract is structured as a Time and Materials (T&M) award, which can pose cost control challenges. 3. Performance is primarily located in Virginia, suggesting a focus on regional IT infrastructure support. 4. The contract has a base period and four option periods, indicating potential for long-term engagement. 5. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a broad market solicitation. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541512 points to computer systems design services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $16.15 million over its potential duration appears moderate for IT support services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for computer systems design services would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure, while flexible, can sometimes lead to higher costs if not managed diligently, compared to fixed-price contracts. The contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton, is a large, established firm with significant federal contracting experience, which may influence pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that the solicitation was made available to all responsible sources. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this approach generally fosters a competitive environment. Full and open competition is intended to ensure the government receives the best value by allowing a wide range of contractors to propose solutions and pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is favorable for taxpayers as it typically drives down prices through market forces and encourages a wider pool of qualified vendors to bid, potentially leading to more cost-effective solutions.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring computer systems design and IT support services are the primary beneficiaries. The contract supports the delivery of IT infrastructure and operational support, crucial for government functions. Performance is concentrated in Virginia, potentially impacting the local IT workforce and economy. The services provided are essential for maintaining the operational efficiency of government IT systems.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically computer systems design services. The federal IT services market is substantial, with agencies consistently investing in technology to modernize operations and enhance cybersecurity. Contracts like this are common as agencies outsource specialized IT functions. Benchmarks for similar IT support contracts vary widely based on scope, duration, and complexity, but this award appears to be within a typical range for a task order of this nature.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a small business set-aside. The award to a large contractor like Booz Allen Hamilton means that opportunities for small businesses would likely arise through subcontracting if Booz Allen chooses to engage them, rather than through direct set-aside provisions.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. The contract's performance and financial aspects would be subject to GSA's internal review processes, contract officer oversight, and potentially audits by the GSA Office of Inspector General. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, but detailed performance reporting is typically internal to the agency and contractor.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it-services, computer-systems-design, general-services-administration, booz-allen-hamilton, time-and-materials, full-and-open-competition, virginia, task-order, professional-services, federal-acquisition-service

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $16.1 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. T6 B1 AND C130 LCMP SUPPORT IDIQ TASK ORDER. PERFORMANCE PRIMARILY AT CONTRACT LOCATION IN VA. BASE AND 4 OPTIONS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-04-23. End: 2026-04-22.

What is the track record of Booz Allen Hamilton in delivering similar IT support services to the federal government?

Booz Allen Hamilton is a major federal contractor with a long history of providing a wide array of IT and professional services to various government agencies. They have extensive experience in areas such as systems engineering, cybersecurity, data analytics, and IT modernization. Their track record generally includes large-scale, complex projects. However, like many large contractors, they have also faced scrutiny and past performance issues on specific contracts. A detailed review of their past performance ratings, any contract disputes, or performance-related corrective actions would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment specific to this type of IT support.

How does the $16.15 million value compare to similar IT support contracts awarded by GSA or other agencies?

The $16.15 million value for this task order, spanning potentially up to five years (base plus four options), is a moderate figure for IT support services. GSA awards numerous IT contracts, and values can range from tens of thousands to billions of dollars depending on the scope and duration. For computer systems design services (NAICS 541512), this value is not exceptionally high or low. To provide a precise comparison, one would need to analyze contracts with similar service descriptions, performance locations, and contract types (Time and Materials) awarded within the last 1-3 years. However, it suggests a focused scope of work rather than a comprehensive agency-wide IT overhaul.

What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for IT support services?

The primary risk with Time and Materials (T&M) contracts, like this one, is the potential for cost overruns. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts reimburse the contractor for direct labor hours at specified rates and for the cost of materials. If work is not managed efficiently, or if the scope is not clearly defined and controlled, labor hours can escalate, leading to costs exceeding initial estimates. This necessitates robust government oversight, including detailed monitoring of labor hours, efficient task management, and clear definition of work requirements to ensure value for taxpayer money. Without strong controls, T&M contracts can be less cost-predictable than other contract types.

How effective is full and open competition in ensuring value for money for IT support services?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value for money in government contracting, including for IT support services. By allowing all responsible sources to compete, the government can leverage market forces to obtain the best combination of price, technical approach, and performance. This broad competition encourages innovation and efficiency among bidders. However, the effectiveness is contingent on the clarity of the solicitation requirements and the government's ability to evaluate proposals objectively. For complex IT services, ensuring that bidders fully understand the requirements and that the evaluation criteria accurately reflect desired outcomes is crucial for realizing the full benefits of competition.

What is the historical spending pattern for computer systems design services by the General Services Administration?

The General Services Administration (GSA) is a significant procurer of IT services, including computer systems design services (NAICS 541512). Historical spending patterns show a consistent and substantial investment in this category as GSA supports various federal agencies' IT needs. GSA utilizes multiple contract vehicles, such as IT Schedule 70 (now IT Professional Services), to facilitate these procurements. Spending in this area has generally trended upwards over the years, reflecting the increasing reliance of government operations on technology. Specific annual spending figures for NAICS 541512 through GSA would require detailed analysis of federal procurement data, but it represents a core area of GSA's service offerings.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,418,904

Exercised Options: $20,858,906

Current Obligation: $16,149,395

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QTCK18D0004

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline

Start Date: 2021-04-23

Current End Date: 2026-04-22

Potential End Date: 2026-04-22 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-01

More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

View all Booz Allen Hamilton Inc federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending