Parsons Government Services Inc. awarded $4.39M for utility and asset management support by GSA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,390,584 ($4.4M)

Contractor: Parsons Government Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2021-04-01

End Date: 2025-03-31

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: UTILITY AND ASSET MANAGEMENT SUSTAINMENT AND DATA COLLECTION SUPPRORT

Place of Performance

Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73145

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $4.4 million to PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC. for work described as: UTILITY AND ASSET MANAGEMENT SUSTAINMENT AND DATA COLLECTION SUPPRORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded via BPA Call, indicating a streamlined procurement process. 2. Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests predictable costs for the government. 3. Contract duration of 1460 days (4 years) provides long-term support. 4. The contract is for Engineering Services, aligning with Parsons' core competencies. 5. No small business set-aside, suggesting a focus on larger prime contractors. 6. The contract is located in Oklahoma, indicating a specific geographic focus.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $4.39 million over four years averages to approximately $1.1 million annually. This appears reasonable for specialized engineering and asset management services, especially considering the firm fixed-price nature which transfers some cost risk to the contractor. Benchmarking against similar large-scale utility and asset management contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment, but the scale and duration suggest a significant undertaking.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition via a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call. This indicates that multiple vendors were likely solicited, and the award was made to the most advantageous offer. The use of a BPA suggests that pre-negotiated terms and conditions were already in place, potentially streamlining the competition process for this specific call order.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers by allowing a wide range of qualified contractors to bid.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring utility and asset management support will benefit from this contract. Services delivered include data collection and support for utility and asset management. The geographic impact is focused on Oklahoma, where the services will be performed. The contract supports specialized engineering roles within the federal acquisition service.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if the BPA is not recompeted broadly.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical asset management data could pose risks.
Scope creep could increase costs beyond the initial fixed-price agreement if not managed tightly.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty.
Long contract duration (4 years) offers stability and continuity of services.
Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
BPA Call mechanism can expedite service delivery.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting utility and asset management functions. The market for such services is robust, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise in infrastructure management, data analytics, and operational support for government facilities. The General Services Administration (GSA) often utilizes BPA vehicles to procure these types of services efficiently across various agencies, reflecting a common approach to managing large-scale federal infrastructure needs.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (sb: false). This suggests that the competition was open to all qualified offerors, including large businesses. While there's no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses, it is common practice for larger prime contractors to engage small businesses for specific tasks or services, though the extent of this is not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), which has established oversight mechanisms for federal procurements. As a Firm Fixed Price contract awarded under full and open competition, it implies adherence to standard acquisition regulations. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases like FPDS. Specific oversight details, such as performance monitoring or dispute resolution processes, would be outlined in the contract's terms and conditions.

Related Government Programs

GSA Federal Acquisition Service Contracts
Utility Management Services
Asset Management Systems
Engineering Consulting Services
Government Facilities Support

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep
Contractor performance risk
Data integrity and security concerns

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $4.4 million to PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC.. UTILITY AND ASSET MANAGEMENT SUSTAINMENT AND DATA COLLECTION SUPPRORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-04-01. End: 2025-03-31.

What is the track record of Parsons Government Services Inc. in delivering similar utility and asset management services to the federal government?

Parsons Government Services Inc. has a significant history of performing complex engineering, construction, and technical services for government clients. Their portfolio often includes large-scale infrastructure projects, environmental services, and program management. While specific details on past utility and asset management contracts of this exact nature would require deeper analysis of their contract history, their established presence and broad capabilities suggest they are well-equipped to handle such requirements. Reviewing past performance evaluations and contract close-outs for Parsons on similar federal contracts would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and success in delivering these specialized services.

How does the $4.39 million contract value compare to similar utility and asset management support contracts awarded by GSA or other agencies?

The $4.39 million contract value over four years, averaging approximately $1.1 million annually, appears to be within a moderate range for specialized engineering and asset management support. GSA and other agencies frequently award contracts for facility management, utility infrastructure, and asset tracking that can range from hundreds of thousands to tens of millions of dollars, depending on scope, duration, and complexity. Without specific details on the exact services and deliverables for this contract, a direct comparison is challenging. However, for a firm fixed-price contract supporting data collection and management for utilities and assets, this value suggests a focused scope rather than an all-encompassing facilities management contract.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential scope creep, where the requirements might expand beyond the initial agreement, leading to cost overruns despite the firm fixed-price structure. Another risk is the contractor's performance; failure to deliver accurate data or effective management support could impact agency operations. Additionally, reliance on a single contractor for critical asset data could pose a risk if the contractor faces financial instability or operational disruptions. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contract management by GSA, including clear performance metrics, regular progress reviews, and defined change control processes. The firm fixed-price nature itself mitigates cost risk for the government, provided the scope is well-defined and managed.

How effective is the BPA Call mechanism in ensuring value for money for this type of service?

The Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call mechanism is designed to expedite the procurement of recurring or commonly needed services, often resulting in faster delivery and potentially lower administrative costs compared to traditional full and open competitions for each individual need. For utility and asset management support, where requirements might be ongoing or arise frequently, a BPA Call can be efficient. Value for money is typically ensured through the initial competition to establish the BPA itself, where multiple vendors compete on price and terms. Subsequent calls then leverage these pre-negotiated conditions. However, the effectiveness relies on the initial BPA competition being robust and the specific call order being well-defined to ensure it still captures competitive pricing for the task at hand.

What are the historical spending patterns for utility and asset management support services by the General Services Administration?

The General Services Administration (GSA) consistently spends significant amounts on facility management, asset management, and related engineering services to support its vast portfolio of federal buildings and assets. Historical spending data indicates a strong reliance on both competitively awarded contracts and BPA vehicles for these types of services. GSA often utilizes task orders against IDIQs (Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity) and BPAs to procure specialized support, reflecting a strategy to achieve economies of scale and streamline acquisition. Annual spending can fluctuate based on infrastructure modernization projects, new facility requirements, and the lifecycle management of existing assets, but it generally represents a substantial portion of GSA's operational budget.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Parsons Corporation

Address: 5875 TRINITY PKWY STE 230, CENTREVILLE, VA, 20120

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,521,480

Exercised Options: $4,517,480

Current Obligation: $4,390,584

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PA0320A0001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline