GSA awards $4.56M contract for CISA Vulnerability Disclosure Platform to Endyna, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,559,702 ($4.6M)

Contractor: Endyna, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2021-02-03

End Date: 2026-05-02

Contract Duration: 1,914 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: CISA VULNERABILITY DISCLOSURE PLATFORM VDP

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22203

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $4.6 million to ENDYNA, INC. for work described as: CISA VULNERABILITY DISCLOSURE PLATFORM VDP Key points: 1. Contract value appears moderate for IT services, requiring benchmarking against similar platforms. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market, potentially leading to competitive pricing. 3. Contract duration of nearly 5 years indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. The award to Endyna, Inc. warrants examination of their past performance and pricing. 5. Services fall under 'Other Computer Related Services,' a broad category needing specific performance metrics. 6. The contract's fixed-price nature aims to control costs, but scope creep could be a risk.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $4.56 million over approximately 5 years for a vulnerability disclosure platform is within a reasonable range for specialized IT services. Benchmarking against similar government or private sector platforms would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The fixed-price contract type suggests an effort to control costs, but the final cost will depend on the scope of services delivered and any potential modifications. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, a definitive assessment of cost-effectiveness is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The presence of 5 bids suggests a competitive environment, which generally benefits the government by driving down prices and encouraging innovation. The specific reasons for excluding other sources, if any, are not detailed but the overall approach points to a deliberate effort to solicit broad market interest.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this procurement is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more favorable price than a sole-source or limited competition award. It also signals that the government is leveraging the market effectively to meet its needs.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), which will utilize the platform for vulnerability disclosures. The services delivered will enhance CISA's ability to receive, manage, and respond to vulnerability reports from the public and security researchers. The geographic impact is national, supporting CISA's mission to secure critical infrastructure across the United States. Workforce implications include potential support roles for Endyna, Inc. staff and increased efficiency for CISA personnel managing vulnerability data.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep in IT service contracts, leading to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
Reliance on a single contractor for a critical platform could pose continuity risks if performance falters.
The 'Other Computer Related Services' NAICS code is broad; specific performance metrics are crucial for assessing quality.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition indicates a robust market and potential for competitive pricing.
Fixed-price contract type helps to establish cost certainty for the government.
The contract is awarded to Endyna, Inc., whose track record will be a key indicator of successful performance.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically focusing on IT services related to cybersecurity and data management. The market for such platforms is driven by increasing cyber threats and the need for agencies to have structured processes for handling security information. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other government contracts for similar vulnerability management or disclosure platforms, as well as private sector investments in cybersecurity operations centers and reporting tools.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside requirement. However, the prime contractor, Endyna, Inc., may choose to subcontract portions of the work to small businesses as part of their overall project execution strategy, which could provide opportunities within the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Acquisition Service, which awarded the contract. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract terms, including performance standards, delivery schedules, and payment milestones. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would fall under the GSA OIG, which investigates fraud, waste, and abuse in GSA programs and contracts.

Related Government Programs

CISA Vulnerability Disclosure Program
Federal Cybersecurity Services
IT Services Contracts
Cybersecurity Platforms
Information Security Management

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues
Risk of scope creep
Dependence on contractor's technical expertise

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $4.6 million to ENDYNA, INC.. CISA VULNERABILITY DISCLOSURE PLATFORM VDP

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENDYNA, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-02-03. End: 2026-05-02.

What is Endyna, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly in IT services and cybersecurity?

Endyna, Inc. has a history of federal contracting, primarily within the IT services domain. Examining their past performance on similar contracts, especially those involving sensitive data management or platform development, is crucial. Key indicators include on-time delivery, adherence to budget, quality of deliverables, and customer satisfaction ratings from previous government agencies. A review of their contract history would reveal if they have successfully managed projects of comparable size and complexity, and if they have any past performance issues or commendations that would inform their suitability for this CISA contract. Understanding their experience with cybersecurity-related platforms specifically would further assess their qualifications.

How does the $4.56 million contract value compare to similar government contracts for vulnerability disclosure platforms?

The $4.56 million contract value over approximately five years for CISA's Vulnerability Disclosure Platform needs to be benchmarked against similar procurements. Government databases like FPDS or specialized contract intelligence platforms can provide data on contracts for 'Other Computer Related Services' (NAICS 541519) or specific cybersecurity platforms. Factors such as the scope of services (e.g., platform development, maintenance, support, reporting features), the number of users, the volume of disclosures handled, and the level of customization will influence pricing. A comparison would reveal if this contract represents a fair market price, potentially indicating good value for money or areas where costs might be higher or lower than average for comparable services.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Primary risks include potential scope creep, where the requirements of the Vulnerability Disclosure Platform may expand beyond the initial agreement, leading to cost overruns and schedule delays. Another risk is contractor performance failure, where Endyna, Inc. may not deliver the services to the required standard, impacting CISA's ability to manage vulnerability disclosures effectively. Technical risks, such as platform security vulnerabilities or integration issues with existing CISA systems, also exist. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract management by GSA, clear performance metrics (Service Level Agreements - SLAs), regular progress reviews, and defined change control processes. The fixed-price nature of the contract also incentivizes the contractor to manage costs.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' approach in ensuring competitive pricing for this type of IT service?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' approach is generally designed to maximize competition while allowing for specific exclusions if justified. In this case, receiving 5 bids suggests that the approach successfully attracted multiple interested parties. This level of competition is a strong indicator that pricing is likely to be competitive, as bidders vie for the contract. The 'exclusion of sources' aspect implies that certain potential bidders were not considered, which could slightly temper the overall competition compared to a purely unrestricted full and open process. However, if the exclusions were based on specific technical requirements or past performance criteria that Endyna, Inc. met and others did not, it could still lead to a well-justified and competitive outcome.

What are the historical spending patterns for CISA's vulnerability management or disclosure initiatives?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for CISA's vulnerability management and disclosure initiatives provides context for the current $4.56 million award. This involves examining previous contracts awarded by CISA or related agencies for similar functions, including platform development, maintenance, and operational support. Understanding the trend in spending over time—whether it has increased, decreased, or remained stable—can indicate evolving needs, technological advancements, or shifts in program priorities. Comparing the current contract's value and duration to past expenditures helps assess if the current investment is consistent with historical levels or represents a significant expansion or change in the program's scale and scope.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: ID08200031

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7926 JONES BRANCH DR STE 620, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,142,388

Exercised Options: $14,142,388

Current Obligation: $4,559,702

Actual Outlays: $3,288,599

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline