HII Mission Technologies Corp awarded $68.3M for Advisory and Assistance Services by GSA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $68,330,710 ($68.3M)

Contractor: HII Mission Technologies Corp

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2023-08-07

End Date: 2026-08-06

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $62.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: AFLCMCWB AAS ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES AWARD

Place of Performance

Location: DAYTON, MONTGOMERY County, OHIO, 45433

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $68.3 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: AFLCMCWB AAS ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES AWARD Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is for Engineering Services, a critical sector for government operations. 3. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide predictable spending. 4. The contract duration of 1095 days (3 years) indicates a medium-term need for these services. 5. Awarded by the General Services Administration (GSA), a key procurement agency. 6. The contract is a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery vehicle.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $68.3 million over three years for advisory and assistance services appears reasonable given the scope of engineering services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering support contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure is generally favorable for cost control. Without specific performance metrics or detailed service breakdowns, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the competitive award process suggests a degree of price discovery.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The GSA's involvement suggests adherence to established procurement regulations designed to ensure fairness and efficiency.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the pool of potential offerors, driving down prices through market forces and increasing the likelihood of securing the best value for public funds.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely government agencies requiring specialized engineering expertise and advisory support. Services delivered will focus on engineering, advisory, and assistance functions, potentially supporting complex government projects. The contract is based in Ohio (OH), suggesting a geographic focus for service delivery or contractor presence. The contract may impact the engineering services workforce, potentially creating or sustaining jobs within HII Mission Technologies Corp and its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if advisory services are not clearly defined.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical advisory functions could pose a risk if performance falters.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive market.
Firm fixed-price contract type helps manage cost overruns.
Contract awarded by GSA, a reputable procurement agency.

Sector Analysis

The Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330) is a significant component of government contracting, providing essential technical expertise for infrastructure, defense, and technology projects. The market is characterized by a mix of large, established firms and specialized smaller businesses. This contract fits within the broader category of professional services supporting federal agencies, with spending often benchmarked against similar large-scale engineering support contracts awarded by agencies like the Department of Defense or NASA.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it indicate specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. Therefore, its direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely limited unless HII Mission Technologies Corp voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities. Further analysis of subcontracting plans would be needed to assess the full impact.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the General Services Administration (GSA) and the specific program office that benefits from the advisory and assistance services. Accountability measures are usually embedded in the contract's performance work statement and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

AFLCMCWB AAS ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES AWARD
Engineering Services Contracts
General Services Administration Contracts
Advisory and Assistance Services

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues
Risk of scope creep
Dependence on contractor expertise

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $68.3 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AFLCMCWB AAS ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES AWARD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $68.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-08-07. End: 2026-08-06.

What is the track record of HII Mission Technologies Corp in delivering similar advisory and assistance services to the federal government?

HII Mission Technologies Corp, a subsidiary of Huntington Ingalls Industries, has a substantial track record in providing a wide range of technical, engineering, and professional services to the U.S. government, including defense and intelligence agencies. Their experience often encompasses complex program management, systems engineering, cybersecurity, and operational support. While specific performance data for this particular contract is not yet available due to its recent award, the company's overall profile suggests a capacity to handle significant government contracts. Past performance reviews and contract awards databases would offer more granular insights into their historical success rates and client satisfaction across various service domains.

How does the awarded value compare to similar advisory and assistance contracts for engineering services?

The awarded value of approximately $68.3 million over three years for engineering advisory and assistance services is substantial, placing it in the mid-to-large tier for such contracts. To benchmark effectively, one would compare this to contracts of similar scope, duration, and service type awarded by agencies like the Department of Defense, NASA, or other large federal entities. For instance, contracts providing systems engineering, technical assistance (SETA), or program management support often fall within this range. The firm fixed-price nature of this contract also influences its comparability; cost-plus contracts might have higher nominal values but carry different risk profiles. A detailed comparison would require analyzing the specific deliverables and the competitive landscape for comparable services.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks for this contract include potential scope creep, where the definition of advisory and assistance services might expand beyond initial expectations, leading to cost overruns or schedule delays, although the firm fixed-price structure aims to mitigate this. Another risk is contractor performance; if HII Mission Technologies Corp fails to deliver the expected quality or timeliness of services, it could impact the government programs they support. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract management, clearly defined performance metrics in the Statement of Work (SOW), regular progress reviews, and established procedures for change management. The competitive award process itself serves as an initial risk mitigation by selecting a contractor presumed to have the capability and offer competitive pricing.

What is the expected effectiveness of these advisory and assistance services in supporting the AFLCMCWB mission?

The effectiveness of these advisory and assistance services hinges on the clarity of the Statement of Work (SOW) and the expertise HII Mission Technologies Corp brings to the AFLCMCWB (Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Warner Robins Air Logistics Complex) mission. These services are intended to provide specialized knowledge, independent analysis, and support that government personnel may lack internally, thereby enhancing decision-making, program execution, and technical problem-solving. If the contractor provides insightful recommendations, accurate assessments, and timely support aligned with the AFLCMCWB's objectives, the services can significantly improve program efficiency and outcomes. Conversely, ineffective support could lead to suboptimal decisions or delays.

How has federal spending on engineering services and advisory support evolved over the past five years?

Federal spending on engineering services and advisory support has generally seen a consistent demand, often increasing during periods of heightened national security concerns, infrastructure investment initiatives, or complex technological modernization efforts. Agencies like the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, and the General Services Administration are major consumers of these services. While specific figures fluctuate annually based on budget appropriations and agency priorities, the overall trend indicates sustained or growing investment in specialized technical and advisory expertise to support government operations and acquisition programs. Factors such as technological advancements and the increasing complexity of government projects contribute to this ongoing need.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFNA23R0005

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc

Address: 8350 BROAD ST STE 1400, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $147,845,652

Exercised Options: $82,433,495

Current Obligation: $68,330,710

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00Q14OADU106

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline