GSA awards $2.7M contract for DEERS/VHA support services to Peraton Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,711,190 ($2.7M)

Contractor: Peraton Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-02-15

End Date: 2027-02-14

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: DEHRADS CALL 1 DEERS VETERANS AFFAIRS SUPPORT SERVICES DVASP

Place of Performance

Location: SEASIDE, MONTEREY County, CALIFORNIA, 93955

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2.7 million to PERATON INC. for work described as: DEHRADS CALL 1 DEERS VETERANS AFFAIRS SUPPORT SERVICES DVASP Key points: 1. Contract awarded via a GSA BPA Call, indicating a pre-competed framework. 2. The contract is for custom computer programming services, a common IT requirement. 3. A firm-fixed-price contract type suggests predictable costs for the government. 4. The duration of 364 days implies a focused, short-term need. 5. The award is not set aside for small businesses, suggesting larger prime contractors are expected. 6. The contract is managed by the Federal Acquisition Service, a central procurement entity.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $2.7 million over one year for custom computer programming services appears within a reasonable range for specialized IT support. Benchmarking against similar contracts for DEERS or VHA support is difficult without more specific service details. However, the use of a GSA BPA Call suggests that pricing was likely pre-negotiated and competitive at the BPA level, which can offer some assurance of value. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control cost overruns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition via a GSA BPA Call. This means that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers at the BPA level. The fact that it was a BPA Call suggests that multiple vendors likely competed for the underlying BPA, and then potentially competed for this specific call. The number of bidders for this specific call is not provided, but the initial BPA competition should have driven price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition, especially at the BPA level, generally leads to better pricing for taxpayers by ensuring a wide range of potential providers can offer their services, fostering a competitive environment.

Public Impact

Veterans will benefit from continued support and maintenance of the DEERS and VHA systems. Essential IT services for managing veteran identification and healthcare information will be maintained. The contract supports the operational needs of the Department of Veterans Affairs. The geographic impact is primarily within California, where the contractor is located, but the services likely support a national veteran population. The contract supports the IT workforce, potentially involving programmers and system administrators.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically custom computer programming. The federal government is a significant consumer of such services to maintain and upgrade its vast IT infrastructure. The market for IT support services for government agencies is large and competitive, with many established players. This contract represents a small portion of overall federal IT spending, but is critical for the specific functions it supports within the VA.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, as indicated by `ss: false` and `sb: false`. This suggests that the requirement was either too large or specialized for small business set-asides, or that the competition was open to all responsible sources, including large businesses. There is no information provided on subcontracting plans, so the impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear, but it is unlikely to involve significant small business subcontracting if not explicitly mandated.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be provided by the contracting officer and the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the General Services Administration (GSA) and potentially the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) program office. The Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) of GSA is responsible for managing the BPA. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it-services, custom-computer-programming, department-of-veterans-affairs, general-services-administration, bpa-call, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, california, medium-value, it-support

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2.7 million to PERATON INC.. DEHRADS CALL 1 DEERS VETERANS AFFAIRS SUPPORT SERVICES DVASP

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PERATON INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-02-15. End: 2027-02-14.

What is Peraton Inc.'s track record with similar IT support contracts for the Department of Veterans Affairs or other large federal health agencies?

Peraton Inc. has a significant history of performing IT and technical services for various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense and intelligence community. While specific details on their DEERS or VHA support contracts are not immediately available in this dataset, their broader portfolio suggests experience with complex government IT systems. A deeper dive into contract databases like FPDS or SAM.gov would reveal specific past performance details, including contract values, durations, and agencies served. This would allow for a more robust assessment of their suitability and past success in delivering comparable services to the VA.

How does the $2.7 million contract value compare to similar custom computer programming services for federal health IT systems?

The $2.7 million contract value for 364 days of custom computer programming services for DEERS/VHA support appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized IT services supporting a critical federal system. Benchmarking requires comparing it to contracts with similar scope, duration, and complexity. For instance, contracts for developing or maintaining large-scale databases, integrating complex systems, or providing cybersecurity programming for health information systems can range from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars annually. Given the sensitive nature of DEERS and VHA data, the pricing likely reflects the need for skilled personnel and adherence to strict security protocols. Without more granular data on the specific services rendered, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the firm-fixed-price structure provides cost predictability.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include potential performance issues if the contractor lacks the specialized expertise required for DEERS/VHA systems, security breaches due to the sensitive nature of veteran data, and potential cost overruns if the fixed-price contract doesn't adequately account for unforeseen technical challenges. Mitigation strategies likely involve rigorous contractor vetting during the BPA and call competition phases, strict adherence to security protocols (e.g., HIPAA, FISMA), regular performance monitoring by a COR, and clear contract terms defining deliverables and acceptance criteria. The firm-fixed-price nature also shifts some cost risk to the contractor. However, the short duration might also pose a risk of knowledge loss or transition difficulties if not managed proactively.

How effective is the GSA BPA Call mechanism in ensuring competitive pricing for IT services like this?

The GSA BPA Call mechanism is generally effective in ensuring competitive pricing, particularly when the underlying BPA was awarded competitively. The BPA establishes pre-negotiated terms and conditions, including pricing structures, with multiple vendors. When a specific requirement arises, agencies issue a 'call' against the BPA, often requiring further competition among the BPA holders. This process leverages the initial competition for the BPA and then introduces a second layer of competition for the specific task order. This dual-competition approach helps drive down prices compared to sole-source procurements. However, the effectiveness can vary depending on the number of vendors on the BPA and the specific competition rules applied to the call.

What is the historical spending trend for DEERS and VHA support services, and how does this contract fit within that trend?

Historical spending on DEERS and VHA support services has likely been substantial and potentially increasing, given the growing veteran population and the increasing reliance on digital health records and IT infrastructure. The Department of Veterans Affairs consistently ranks among the largest federal agencies for IT spending. This $2.7 million contract represents a specific, relatively small component of that overall spending. Analyzing past spending on similar IT support contracts within the VA would provide context. If spending in this category has been steadily increasing, this award aligns with that trend. Conversely, a significant deviation could warrant further investigation into the specific needs driving this particular contract.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesCustom Computer Programming Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSIT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFMA25Q0005

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12975 WORLDGATE DR, HERNDON, VA, 20170

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $58,919,995

Exercised Options: $2,711,190

Current Obligation: $2,711,190

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QFMA24A0012

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-02-15

Current End Date: 2027-02-14

Potential End Date: 2031-02-14 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-03

More Contracts from Peraton Inc.

View all Peraton Inc. federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending