GSA awards $2.2M R&D contract for technical and management expertise to Modern Technology Solutions, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,204,604 ($2.2M)

Contractor: Modern Technology Solutions, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-09-16

End Date: 2026-03-14

Contract Duration: 179 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: TO3 BRIDGE TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT EXPERTISE AFLCMCWAG

Place of Performance

Location: DAYTON, GREENE County, OHIO, 45433

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2.2 million to MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC. for work described as: TO3 BRIDGE TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT EXPERTISE AFLCMCWAG Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, indicating clear cost expectations. 2. Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process. 3. Contract duration of 179 days indicates a short-term, focused engagement. 4. The contract falls under R&D in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences. 5. Awarded by GSA's Federal Acquisition Service, a common channel for federal procurement. 6. The contract is a delivery order, likely part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2.2 million for a 179-day period appears reasonable for specialized R&D technical and management expertise. Without specific deliverables or comparable project scopes, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which is a positive indicator for the government. Benchmarking against similar R&D support contracts would provide further insight into pricing competitiveness.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, leading to potentially better pricing and innovative solutions. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open competition suggests multiple entities vied for this award, which is a positive sign for price discovery and market responsiveness.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition maximizes the potential for the government to secure the best value for taxpayer dollars by encouraging a wide range of qualified contractors to participate and offer competitive pricing.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely federal agencies requiring specialized R&D technical and management support, potentially within the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC) as suggested by the contract description. The services delivered will focus on advancing physical, engineering, and life sciences research and development. The geographic impact is centered in Ohio, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications include the employment of skilled researchers, engineers, and project managers by the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to gauge the success of the R&D efforts.
The short duration of the contract may limit the depth of impact or long-term development.
Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly, given the nature of R&D projects.

Positive Signals

Award to a single contractor suggests they met all technical and cost requirements.
Firm-fixed-price contract aligns incentives for cost control.
Competition indicates a vetted and capable provider was selected.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on physical, engineering, and life sciences. This is a critical area for innovation and technological advancement within the federal government. The market for R&D services is highly specialized, with numerous firms competing for government contracts. Spending in this sector is often driven by national security, scientific discovery, and technological modernization needs. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend on the specific sub-discipline of R&D.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests the contract was not specifically targeted towards small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor engages in subcontracting with small businesses, which is not detailed in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the awarding agency (General Services Administration, Federal Acquisition Service). Performance monitoring and adherence to contract terms are key oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Research and Development Services
Technical Support Services
Management Consulting Services
Engineering Services
Life Sciences Research
Physical Sciences Research

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics
Short contract duration may limit long-term impact
Potential for undefined scope in R&D projects

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2.2 million to MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.. TO3 BRIDGE TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT EXPERTISE AFLCMCWAG

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-16. End: 2026-03-14.

What is the specific nature of the 'technical and management expertise' being procured for AFLCMC?

The contract description 'TO3 BRIDGE TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT EXPERTISE AFLCMC WAG' suggests the procurement is for specialized support services related to technical challenges and program management within the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC). This could encompass a wide range of activities, such as systems engineering, program planning, risk management, acquisition support, or technical analysis for specific weapon systems or programs. The 'WAG' might refer to a specific program or directorate. Without further details on the specific tasks or deliverables, the exact nature of the expertise remains broad but is clearly aimed at enhancing the AFLCMC's operational and developmental capabilities.

How does the $2.2 million value compare to similar R&D support contracts awarded by GSA or other agencies?

Benchmarking the $2.2 million value requires comparing it to contracts with similar scopes, durations, and service types within the R&D sector. Contracts for specialized technical and management expertise can vary significantly in price based on the complexity of the research, the required skill sets, and the duration. For a 179-day contract, $2.2 million implies a substantial daily rate, suggesting highly specialized or senior-level expertise is required. A comprehensive comparison would involve analyzing data from similar GSA Federal Acquisition Service contracts or other agency procurements for R&D support, looking at average contract values, hourly rates, and total contract ceilings for comparable services.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or detailed deliverables for this contract. Typically, R&D support contracts would outline specific milestones, reports, analyses, or prototypes to be delivered. The absence of this information in the summary data makes it difficult to assess the expected outcomes and measure the contractor's performance effectively. Further review of the contract's statement of work (SOW) would be necessary to identify these crucial performance metrics and ensure alignment with government objectives.

What is the track record of Modern Technology Solutions, Inc. (MTSI) in performing similar government R&D contracts?

Modern Technology Solutions, Inc. (MTSI) has a significant track record of performing various government contracts, including those in research and development, engineering, and technical support. They often work on complex defense and aerospace programs. Information available through federal procurement databases (like FPDS) would detail their past performance, including contract values, agencies served, and types of services rendered. A review of their past performance ratings and any reported issues on previous contracts would provide insight into their reliability and capability in delivering on similar R&D requirements.

What is the historical spending trend for similar R&D technical and management expertise procurements by the GSA or AFLCMC?

Analyzing historical spending trends for similar R&D technical and management expertise procurements by GSA or AFLCMC would involve examining contract award data over several fiscal years. This would reveal whether spending in this specific niche has been increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable. It would also highlight the primary agencies utilizing such services and the typical contract values and durations. Understanding these trends can help contextualize the current $2.2 million award and anticipate future procurement needs and budget allocations within this service category.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFLA25Q0070

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5285 SHAWNEE RD, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22312

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,642,259

Exercised Options: $2,204,605

Current Obligation: $2,204,604

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1

Total Subaward Amount: $213,946

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QRAA20D0036

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline