GSA's $15.5M R&D Contract with APTIMA INC Faces Limited Competition, Raising Oversight Concerns
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $15,557,800 ($15.6M)
Contractor: Aptima Inc
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2022-05-13
End Date: 2026-05-12
Contract Duration: 1,460 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.7K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: TO 07 SCARS
Place of Performance
Location: DAYTON, GREENE County, OHIO, 45433
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $15.6 million to APTIMA INC for work described as: TO 07 SCARS Key points: 1. The contract value is $15.5 million, awarded for R&D services. 2. Competition is limited, with the contract type noted as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'. 3. Potential risks include lack of competitive pricing and reduced value for taxpayer dollars. 4. The sector is Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract is a Cost Plus Fixed Fee type, which can lead to higher costs if not managed closely. Without competitive benchmarks, assessing the fairness of the fixed fee is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was not available for competition, suggesting a sole-source or limited source justification. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Limited competition may result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for the R&D services provided.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may not be receiving the best value due to the lack of competitive bidding. The government's ability to innovate could be impacted if limited competition becomes a trend. Transparency in R&D spending is crucial, especially when competition is restricted.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
- Lack of transparency in award justification
Positive Signals
- Supports critical R&D efforts
- Long-term contract duration allows for sustained research
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under R&D in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences. Spending in this sector is vital for technological advancement but requires careful oversight to ensure efficiency and innovation.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis is needed to determine if small business participation was considered.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status warrants close oversight to ensure the justification is sound and that the government is still achieving value for money. Regular performance reviews are essential.
Related Government Programs
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
- General Services Administration Contracting
- Federal Acquisition Service Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
- Lack of justification for limited competition
- Potential for inflated costs
- No indication of small business participation
Tags
research-and-development-in-the-physical, general-services-administration, oh, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $15.6 million to APTIMA INC. TO 07 SCARS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is APTIMA INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $15.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-05-13. End: 2026-05-12.
What was the specific justification for not making this R&D contract available for competition?
The justification for limiting competition is not provided in the data. Typically, such decisions are based on factors like unique capabilities of a specific contractor, urgent needs, or specific research requirements that only one entity can fulfill. Without this information, it's difficult to assess if the limited competition was warranted or if it represents a missed opportunity for better pricing.
How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure impact the risk of cost overruns in this R&D contract?
Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contracts can pose a risk of cost overruns if the fixed fee is not adequately determined or if the contractor's costs escalate beyond initial projections. While the fee is fixed, the government bears the cost of performance. Robust oversight and clear performance metrics are crucial to mitigate the risk of inflated costs and ensure the contractor remains incentivized to control expenses.
What is the potential impact of this limited competition award on future R&D procurement strategies within the Federal Acquisition Service?
If this limited competition award is not well-justified or does not demonstrate exceptional value, it could set a precedent for similar R&D procurements, potentially discouraging broader competition. Conversely, if the R&D outcomes are highly successful and innovative, it might reinforce the value of specialized, non-competitive awards in specific niche areas. Transparency in the justification process is key to maintaining confidence.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: 47QFLA22Q0108
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Aptima, Inc.
Address: 8 CABOT RD, WOBURN, MA, 01801
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $15,770,578
Exercised Options: $15,770,578
Current Obligation: $15,557,800
Actual Outlays: $-1,093
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 125
Total Subaward Amount: $116,677,634
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47QFLA19D0012
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-05-13
Current End Date: 2026-05-12
Potential End Date: 2027-05-12 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-30
More Contracts from Aptima Inc
- THE Role of Climate in the Prevention of Harmful Behaviors — $11.3M (General Services Administration)
- Sbir Phase III Task Order Chief Modeling Simulation Office Cmso — $6.2M (General Services Administration)
- Aegis Ashore Training Support Services to 01 — $5.3M (General Services Administration)
- Sbir Phase III Proficiency Based Training (PBT) — $4.6M (General Services Administration)
- TO 09 Darpa Semafor — $3.2M (General Services Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)